Plaxes Pascoe, 1885
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5380.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC26C48-9EA8-447E-8B19-D37C630C1178 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10249195 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/29067A28-FFB0-996E-DDF7-FF5EFF41A539 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Plaxes Pascoe, 1885 |
status |
|
Plaxes Pascoe, 1885 View in CoL
The type species of Plaxes is P. impar , by monotypy. The collecting data of the type specimens given in the description are “ Sarawak, Doria ; Sungei Bulu (Sumatra), Beccari ”. Pascoe (1885) stated in the introduction that the specimens were sent to him by Giacomo Doria (1840–1913) and Raffaello Gestro (1845–1936) from the Museo Civico in Genoa. We located ten specimens of the original series in five museum collections (ANIC 1, MfNB 1, MSNG 5, NHMUK 2, SNSD 1). Pascoe seems to have retained one pair from Sumatra and one male from Sarawak (all in NHMUK) and replaced the original labels with blue lentiform discs stating the origin ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 6–8 ), but the female from Sumatra was later donated to Elwood C. Zimmerman (1912–2004) and, following his death, bequeathed to the ANIC. The MSNG has one male and two females from Sumatra and one pair from Sarawak, all with the pink printed locality label shown in Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6–8 . The MfNB has one female from Sarawak with the same printed locality label, and the SNSD has one female from Sumatra with Faust’s handwritten label “Sumatra / Doria ”. The latter two stood unidentified in the unsorted material. The MfNB specimen is not recorded in the CGMZB, but Sarawak material obtained from Doria had been recorded as early as 1873 (CGMZB #57011–57027).
All six specimens of P. impar from Sumatra, collected by Odoardo Beccari (1843–1920), are conspecific with L. abdominalis , but the four from Sarawak are a different species. The original description of P. impar pertains to both included species (corpus infra piceum vel testaceum). Pascoe labelled his retained Sarawak male as the type of P. impar ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 6–8 ), and so did Doria with the Sarawak male returned to him ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6–8 ; note Pascoe’s original label). These designations are unpublished and therefore invalid, and the species name thus lacks a single, name-bearing type. We consequently here designate a lectotype for Plaxes impar . Because the pair of syntypes in the MSNG has labels with more detailed information than the two in the NHMUK, we select as lectotype the male ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–5 ) with the following label data: “Borneo / Sarawak / 1865-66. / Coll. G. Doria ”, [handwritten by Pascoe] “ Plaxes / impar / ♂ ”, “174”, [handwrittEn by Doria ?] “ PlaxEs / impar Pasc. / typus!”, “ SYNTYPUS / PlaxEs / impar”, “MusEo Civico / di Genova”, “ LECTOTYPE / Plaxes impar / Prena et al. des. 2023” and “ Lyterius / impar / Prena det. 2023” ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 6–8 ). The other four returned specimens have the same syntype label but no original identification. We speculate that Doria and Beccari collected the four Sarawak specimens of the type series of P. impar during the first leg of their 1865–1868 expedition to Borneo, either in the surroundings of Kuching or en route to the Lupar estuary, before Doria fell ill and returned to Italy in March 1866 ( Viciani et al. 2021). The six Sumatran specimens of the type series of P. impar (ANIC 1, MSNG 3, NHMUK 1, SNSD 1), representing L. abdominalis , were collected by Beccari in September 1878 (MSNG, label data) at Sungei Bulu (“Bamboo River”), probably in the vicinity of Mount Singgalang in Padang, Western Sumatra. Faust (1896) identified a female of the L. abdominalis series as P. impar and described Plaxes dispar Faust, 1896 . Plaxes impar (as fixed herein) and P. dispar are exceedingly similar to each other, and more material is needed to ascertain whether the difference in the mesotibiae of the males signifies the existence of two distinct species or merely infraspecific variation, as occurs in another series from Sarawak ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11–14 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |