Pseudophilyra parilis, Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng, 2019

Komai, Tomoyuki, Shimetsugu, Miho & Ng, Peter K. L., 2019, Redescription and new records of a poorly known leucosiid crab, Pseudophilyra punctulata Chen & Ng, 2003, and description of a new species of Pseudophilyra from Japan (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura), Zootaxa 4550 (2), pp. 251-267 : 258-266

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4550.2.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:34D31A7C-D135-4CD2-9882-8AACFDBEF5E9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5934161

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C966DBD-79D5-4C66-B2BC-FF38C412953D

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:6C966DBD-79D5-4C66-B2BC-FF38C412953D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pseudophilyra parilis
status

sp. nov.

Pseudophilyra parilis View in CoL n. sp.

[New Japanese name: Hamabe-kobushi-modoki]

( Figs. 5–8 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 )

Material examined. Holotype: CBM-ZC 14485 , 1 male (7.2× 6.2 mm), Maehama Beach, Funakoshi, Daiou-cho , Shima , Mie Prefecture, 34°16.11’N, 136°52.11’E, intertidal, sand, 23 July 2013, coll. S. Kimura. GoogleMaps

Paratype: ZRC 2018.0258 View Materials , 1 male (6.5× 5.6 mm), same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; ZRC 2018.0259 View Materials , 1 female (8.1× 7.4 mm), 1 immature female (6.0× 5.4 mm), same locality, 21 August 2013, coll. S. Kimura GoogleMaps ; CBM-ZC 14486 , 1 male (7.3× 6.3 mm), 1 female (7.9× 7.3 mm), same locality, 26 August 2017, coll. M. Shimetsugu GoogleMaps ; CBM-ZC 14487 , 1 male (7.0× 6.2 mm), 1 female (9.5× 8.8 mm), same locality, 8 September 2017, coll. S. Kimura GoogleMaps ; CBM-ZC 15184 , 1 female (7.7× 6.9 mm), Saino, Shirahama , Wakayama Prefecture, 33°39.21’N, 135°21.49’E, intertidal, 1 June 2018, coll. S. Kimura. GoogleMaps

Description. Holotype male. Carapace ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6A View FIGURE 6 ) subpyriform in general outline, 1.15 times as long as wide; dorsal surface convex, glabrous, coarsely punctate. Front ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) weakly produced anteriorly, anterior margin trilobate, median lobe subsemicircular, projecting anteriorly, distinctly exceeding lateral teeth; lateral lobe (inner orbital lobe) blunt, not particularly produced. Orbits small; supraorbital margin strongly oblique, with short, blunt lateral tooth demarcated mesially by deep, narrow longitudinal suture; bilobed anterior margin of efferent branchial channel forming lower orbital margin, inner angle acutely pointed. Hepatic region slightly inflated, forming low, dome-like elevation. Mesogastric region with obsolescent median ridge, shallowly depressed on both sides of ridge. Lateral to posterior margins keel-like, bordered with relatively coarse granules ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ), with low convexity just below hepatic region (pterygostomial margin); posterior margin bi-keeled, both nearly straight.

Eyestalks ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) retractable, subcylindrical, mesial side protruding into minute blunt distal tubercle exceeding cornea. Antennular fossa continuous with orbit, partially sealed by basal plate on antennule; antennules folded slightly obliquely within fossa. Antenna very small, inserted between antennular fossa and orbit.

Thoracic sternum glabrous. Sternite 3 ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ) subtriangular, anterior margin produced anteriorly with subacute median point, surface slightly depressed medially. Sternite 4 ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ) largest, anterior and lateral margins coarsely granular, otherwise with sparse granules and few punctae. Sternites 5–8 becoming smaller toward posterior, surfaces with few punctae. Episternite 4 clearly demarcated from sternite 4; episternites 5–8 each with shallowly concave outer margin. Sternopleonal cavity deep, extending onto posterior part of thoracic sternite 3, margins on sternite 4, corresponding to pleomere 6 and telson, bordered with coarse granules

Maxilliped 3 ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 ) almost flat, outer surface with scattered punctae. Ischium subrectangular, distinctly longer than wide; merus triangular, tapering distally to subacute tip, subequal in length to ischium measured along mesial margin; lateral margin of ischium and merus minutely beaded. Exopod with distal article spatuliform, lateral margin minutely beaded.

Chelipeds ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6F, G View FIGURE 6 ) symmetrical, 1.5 times as long as carapace, glabrous. Merus subcylindrical, about 3.0 times as long as wide, covered with pearly granules of various sizes except for distal one-third of upper surface and distal two-thirds of lower surfaces where granules almost absent carpus. Carpus short, cup-shaped, inner surface concave; upper inner margin with row of small granules, but otherwise almost smooth. Palm compressed, 1.9 times as long as wide, slightly sinuous on outer (extensor) margin, inner (flexor) margin also slightly sinuous; upper surface almost smooth, lower surface with scattered punctae; fixed finger weakly deflexed, nearly straight, terminating in slightly curved, blunt tip; dactylus 0.7 times as long as palm, terminating in slightly curved, blunt tip; both occlusal margins meeting in distal half and forming oval hiatus in proximal half, each without conspicuous teeth.

Ambulatory legs ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6H View FIGURE 6 ) slender, glabrous, similar in shape, gradually decreasing in length from first to fourth; each merus cylindrical; each carpus as long as or shorter than propodus; propodus somewhat compressed; each dactylus flattened, slightly curved, tapering distally to minute corneous claw, subequal in length to carpus and propodus combined.

Pleon ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ) elongate-triangular, gently curved sternally. Somites 1 and 2 very short, transversely linear. Main fused section consisting of somites 3–6 elongate trapezoidal, outer surface with scattered punctae; trace of suture between somites 4 and 5 still discernible; proximolateral margin of fused somite 3 and 4 slightly expanded, lateral margin with low convexity medially. Somite 6 with trace of median tubercle somewhat proximal to distal margin; lateral margin with low convexity at proximal 0.2. Telson elongate-triangular, 1.9 times as long as wide.

Gonopod 1 ( Fig. 6J, K View FIGURE 6 ) slender, slightly sinuously curved (distal half nearly straight except for outwardly curved distal part), gradually tapering, reaching nearly to suture between thoracic sternites 3/4, deeply bifurcate at distal 0.3; branches subequal in length, each terminating in acute tip. Gonopod 2 ( Fig. 6L View FIGURE 6 ) about 0.3 length of gonopod 1, gently curved, proximal part slightly expanded; distal part unequally bilobed, terminal lobe bluntly pointed.

Paratype males. Agree well with holotype male. Carapace 1.13–1.15 times as long as wide. Chelipeds 1.4–1.5 times as long as carapace.

Female. Carapace ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ) 1.08–1.10 times as long as wide. Front relatively slightly less produced than in males.

Exposed lateral part of thoracic sternum very narrow ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ), smooth, forming outer wall of deeply excavated sternopleonal cavity; sutures between sternites 4/5, 5/6, 6/7 and 7/8 distinct; sternites 1–3 fused, deeply depressed below to accommodate telson. Sternopleonal cavity ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ) circular in outline, margins distinctly delimited; sutures between sternites 4/5, 5/6, 6/7, and 7/8 widely interrupted medially; median suture absent; sternite 4 large, occupying anterior half of sternopleonal concavity, with scattered short, occasionally feathered, setae. Vulvae ( Fig. 7B, C View FIGURE 7 ) small, located just posterior to mesial end of suture between sternites 5/6, outline circular, without protrusion on outer margin.

Cheliped slightly slender than that of males, 1.3 times as long as carapace; palm 2.2 times as long as wide; occlusal margins of fingers of cheliped without conspicuous teeth proximal to meeting point ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ).

Pleon ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ) broad, dome-like; somites 1 and 2 short, transversely band-shaped, somite 2 about twice longer than somite 1; main fused section (somites 3–6) ovoid, no trace of sutures. Telson (damaged in illustrated specimen) small, subsemicircular, exceeding beyond anterior margin of thoracic sternite 3.

Colour in life. See Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 . Carapace generally gray or gray-brown, sometimes with irregular blotches of white. Thoracic sternum and pleon entirely white. Cheliped with large gray or gray-brown patches on dorsal surface of merus and palm; fingers with tint of light brown on dorsal surface; ventral surface overall white. Ambulatory legs generally white, with spots of gray or brown on meri, carpi and propodi.

Distribution. Presently known only from the type locality, Funakoshi, Daiou-cho, Shima, Mie Prefecture, Japan; intertidal to shallow subtidal sand bottom.

Remarks. Pseudophilyra parilis n. sp. closely resembles P. punctulata in the general shape and ornamentation of the carapace, the structure of the cheliped and the deeply bifurcate distal part of the male gonopod 1. The new species differs from P. punctulata in the coarser granules bordering the carapace lateral margins ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 versus Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ) and the less curved distal part of the male gonopod 1 ( Fig. 6J, K View FIGURE 6 versus Fig. 3I, J View FIGURE 3 ). The other potentially useful characters are: in males, the sternite 4 is more strongly granular in P. parilis n. sp. than in P. punctulata ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 versus Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ); the surface of the fused part of the pleon is more strongly punctate in P. parilis n. sp. than in P. punctulata ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 versus Fig. 3H View FIGURE 3 ); and the outer margin of the female vulva is straight in P. parilis n. sp., rather than forming a rounded protrusion in P. punctulata .

Pseudophilyra tridentata View in CoL was originally described from Japan on the basis of a female holotype, and has been recorded from various Indo-West Pacific localities ( Alcock 1896; Calman 1900; Laurie 1906; Rathbun 1910; Balss 1916, 1922; Stephensen 1946; Tyndale-Biscoe & George 1962; Campbell & Stephenson 1970). Komatsu & Takeda (2000) presented a redescription of the holotype, and clarified that previous records of P. tridentata View in CoL by Sakai (1937, 1976) actually represent P. intermedia View in CoL instead. It is likely that those records outside Japan contain species other than P. tridentata View in CoL . For example, the male first gonopods illustrated by Stephensen (1946) from the Persian Gulf and Tyndale-Biscoe & George (1962) from Australia appear to be different: Stephensen’s (1946: fig. 9D) illustration shows a simple distal part, whereas Tyndale-Biscoe & George (1962: 87, fig. 7.6) specifically mentioned that “Distal third divided into two by deep cleft”. We examined Japanese specimens undoubtedly identified with P. tridentata View in CoL , as well as the redescription of the holotype by Komatsu & Takeda (2000), for comparison with the new species and P. punctulata View in CoL . Unfortunately, no adult male specimens of P. tridentata View in CoL were available for examination, but in one immature male specimen, although the gonopod 1 was not fully developed, the distal part was already bifurcate. It can thus be assumed that P. tridentata View in CoL also has a distally bifurcate gonopod 1, like P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. and P. punctulata View in CoL . Nevertheless, P. tridentata View in CoL differs from the latter two species in many features: the frontal part of the carapace is more strongly produced with a proportionately narrower frontal margin in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10A, C View FIGURE 10 ) than in the latter two species ( Figs 3A View FIGURE 3 , 6A View FIGURE 6 ); the lateral lobes on the frontal margin are distinctly produced in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ) (not produced in P. punctulata View in CoL and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp.; Figs. 3B View FIGURE 3 , 6B View FIGURE 6 ); the carapace dorsal surface is relatively smoother and less punctate in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) than in P. punctulata View in CoL ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ); the mesogastric median ridge and hepatic elevations on the carapace are more prominent in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10A, C View FIGURE 10 ) than in P. punctulata View in CoL ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ) and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ); the lateral margin of the carapace is nearly smooth or microscopically granular in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ), rather than moderately granular ( P. punctulata View in CoL ; Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ) or coarsely granular ( P. parilis View in CoL n. sp.; Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ); the male thoracic sternite 4 is finely granular anterolaterally in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ), whereas it is more coarsely granular in P. punctulata View in CoL ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ) and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); and the cheliped palm is more robust in P. tridentata View in CoL ( Fig. 10F, G View FIGURE 10 ) than in P. punctulata View in CoL ( Figs. 3F, G View FIGURE 3 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ) and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. ( Figs. 6F, B View FIGURE 6 , 7B View FIGURE 7 ) (1.8 times as long as wide in P. tridentata View in CoL versus 2.0–2.2 times as long as wide in the latter two species). Furthermore, P. tridentata View in CoL seems to be restricted to subtidal depths below 40 m, whereas P. punctulata View in CoL and P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. occur in intertidal to shallow subtidal depths.

It may be interesting to mention that the episternites 4 are partially fused to the thoracic sternite 4 in the adult male of P. punctulata View in CoL ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ), whereas they are fully separated from the thoracic sternite 4 in the adult males of P. parilis View in CoL n. sp. ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ). The significance of this character should be reassessed when more adult male specimens become available for examination.

Etymology. From the Latin “ parilis ” (adj., similar), in reference to the close similarity of the new species to Pseudophilyra punctulata .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

InfraOrder

Brachyura

Family

Leucosiidae

SubFamily

Ebaliinae

Genus

Pseudophilyra

Loc

Pseudophilyra parilis

Komai, Tomoyuki, Shimetsugu, Miho & Ng, Peter K. L. 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. parilis

Komai & Shimetsugu & Ng 2019
2019
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. punctulata

Chen & Ng 2003
2003
Loc

P. intermedia

Ihle 1918
1918
Loc

Pseudophilyra tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
Loc

P. tridentata

Miers 1879
1879
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF