Raveniola vulpina, Zonstein, 2024

Zonstein, Sergei L., 2024, A revision of the spider genus Raveniola (Araneae, Nemesiidae). II. Species from Central Asia, European Journal of Taxonomy 967, pp. 1-185 : 81-87

Raveniola vulpina sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C7957862-1670-4A16-AF15-DABDA8453319 Figs 34–35 , 61–62 , 76–77 , 108 , 134–135 , 164–165 , 194–195 , 227–228 , 254–255 , 288–289 , 309 , 377–378 , 459–465 , 551–554 , 616–618 , 735–738, 760

Raveniola mikhailovi – Zonstein 2021: only figs 9–10 (♂; mismatched and erroneously used for the publication; see above).

Diagnosis

Males of Raveniola vulpina sp. nov. differ from the related male congeners by the following characters: from R. michailovi and R. virgata by a gently arcuate (vs slightly twisted) embolus, and from R. nenilini sp. nov. in having a considerably longer and thinner palpal tibia, as well as a narrower copulatory bulb ( Figs 377–378 , 459–465 cf. Figs 373–374, 376 , 447 , 458 ). Females of R. vulpina differ from females of the related species in having the dorsal abdominal pattern lacking a clearly discernible median stripe (vs its presence; see Figs 61–62 cf. Figs 56–58, 60 ). Additionally, they are distinguishable due to a specific structure of the spermathecae, with broadly spaced, curved and flattened trunks and widely diverging lateral diverticula (vs differently arranged spermathecal structures in other species; Figs 551–554 cf. Figs 538–543, 547–550 ).

Etymology

The specific epithet ‘ vulpina ’ is the Latin adjective of ‘ vulpes ’ (= fox) meaning ‘vulpine’ and referring to the foxy ground colouration of this species.

Material examined

Holotype

KYRGYZSTAN • ♂; Chatkal Mts. (southern slope), Sary-Chelek Nature Reserve , Tumanyak Gorge, Karagailisai; 41°49.4′ N, 71°56.5′ E; 1400–1600 m a.s.l.; 5 Jul. 2000; S. Zonstein leg.; SMNH.

Paratypes (18 ♂♂, 30 ♀♀)

KYRGYZSTAN • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; SMNH • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; 41°48.7′ N, 71°55.3′ E; 1800 m a.s.l.; SMNH • 1 ♀; Karangitun Gorge ; 41°48′ N, 71°57′ E; 1700 m a.s.l.; 26 May 1993; S. Zonstein leg.; SMNH • 9 ♂♂, 15 ♀♀; Talas Mts (southern slope), Uzunahmat Canyon, Birbulak Gorge; 42°01.6′ N, 72°24.6′ E; 1400–1800 m a.s.l.; 14 Aug. 1986; S. Zonstein leg.; SMNH • 6 ♂♂, 11 ♀♀; Talas Mts , Tereksai Canyon; 42°10′ N, 72°21′ E; 2450– 2800 m a.s.l.; 16 Aug. 1986; S. Zonstein leg.; SMNH • 1 ♂; Talas Mts (northern slope), Beshtash Canyon, Kyrgolot Gorge; 42°18.3′ N, 72°20.4′ E; 2030 m a.s.l.; 18 Aug. 1986; S. Zonstein leg.; SMNH .

Additional material (3 juvs)

KYRGYZSTAN • 2 juvs; Talas Mts , Otmek Valley 7 km WNW of Otmek Pass; 42°19′ N, 73°07′ E; 2800 m a.s.l.; 9 Jul. 1987; S. Zonstein and S. V. Ovchinnikov leg.; SMNH • 1 juv.; Kyrgyz Mts (northern slope), Kara-Balta Canyon , near the confluence of Kara-Balta and Chon-Mazar rivers; 42°24′ N, 73°46′ E; 2100–2200 m a.s.l.; 3 Jul. 1994; S. V. Ovchinnikov leg.; SMNH .

Description

Male (holotype)

HABITUS. See Figs 34 , 76.

MEASUREMENTS. TBL 12.90, CL 5.62, CW 4.82, LL 0.43, LW 0.83, SL 2.80, SW 2.38.

COLOUR. Carapace, palps and legs (except for darker brown femora) brownish orange; leg I slightly darker than other legs; eye tubercle blackish brown; chelicerae medium reddish brown; sternum, labium and maxillae light yellowish orange; abdomen yellowish brown, with almost indistinct brownish dorsal chevron-like pattern and a few small brown marks on ventral side; book-lungs and spinnerets pale yellowish brown.

CEPHALOTHORAX. Carapace and chelicerae as shown in Fig. 108 . Clypeus and eye group as in Fig. 264 . Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.14(0.20), ALE 0.27, PLE 0.18, PME 0.16; AME–AME 0.11(0.05), ALE–AME 0.09(0.06), ALE–PLE 0.07, PLE–PME 0.05, PME–PME 0.29. Anterior cheliceral edge with unmodified setae; rastellum not developed. Intercheliceral tumescence indiscernible. Each cheliceral furrow with 9 promarginal teeth and 1 mesobasal denticle. MIT indiscernible. Sternum, labium and maxillae as shown in Fig. 227 . Maxillae with 11–12 cuspules each.

LEGS. Tibia and metatarsus I as in Figs 288 , 309 . Scopula: entire and distal on metatarsi I–II; entire on tarsus I; narrowly divided by setae on tarsus II; widely divided on tarsus III; vestigial on tarsus IV. Trichobothria: 2 rows of 8–9 each on tibiae, 13–15 on metatarsi, 11–13 on tarsi, 8 on cymbium. PTC I–II and PTC III–IV with 10–11 and 11–13 teeth on each margin, respectively.

SPINATION. Palp: femur d3, pd3, rd2; patella pd2; tibia d2, p3, r3, v6; cymbium d4. Leg I: femur d4, pd3, rd3; patella p1; tibia p2, pv2, r1, rv2+2M, metatarsus v2. Leg II: femur d4, pd3; patella p1; tibia p3, v8(7); metatarsus v6. Leg III: femur d4, pd3(2), rd3; patella p2; tibia d3, p3, r3, v9; metatarsus p4, r3, v10(9). Leg IV: femur d4, pd3, rd2; patella p2; tibia d4, p3, r3, v9; metatarsus p4, r4, v11. Tarsi I–IV aspinose.

PALP. Tibia, cymbium and copulatory bulb as shown in Fig. 377 . Embolus long, tapering and slightly curved subapically ( Figs 459–462 ).

SPINNERETS. See Fig. 616 . PMS: length 0.25, diameter 0.11. PLS: maximal diameter 0.51; length of basal, medial and apical segments 0.87, 0.58, 0.48; total length 1.93; apical segment triangular.

Female (paratype)

HABITUS. See Figs 61 , 77.

MEASUREMENTS. TBL 17.80, CL 6.31, CW 5.72, LL 0.59, LW 1.22, SL 3.22, SW 3.01.

COLOUR. In general as in male, with more intensely shaded dorsal abdomen and chelicerae.

CEPHALOTHORAX. Carapace and chelicerae as shown in Fig. 134 . Clypeus and eye group as in Fig. 194 . Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.13(0.21), ALE 0.25, PLE 0.20, PME 0.12;AME–AME 0.18(0.10),

ALE–AME 0.13(0.09), ALE–PLE 0.08, PLE–PME 0.08, PME–PME 0.43. Cheliceral rastellum absent. Each cheliceral furrow with 8 promarginal teeth and 1–3 mesobasal denticles. Sternum, labium and maxillae as shown in Fig. 254 . Maxillae with 13–20 cuspules each.

LEGS. Scopula: entire and distal on metatarsi I–II; entire on palpal tarsus and tarsus I; narrowly divided by setae on tarsus II; sparse and widely divided on tarsus III; rudimentary on tarsus IV. Trichobothria: 2 rows of 8–10 each on tibiae, 14–15 on metatarsi, 12–15 on tarsi, 10 on palpal tarsus. Palpal claw with 3 promarginal teeth. PTC I–II and III–IV with 6–7 and 6 teeth on each margin, respectively.

SPINATION. Femora I–IV with one basodorsal spine and 3 dorsal bristles; palpal femur dorsally with 4 bristles; tarsi I–IV aspinose. Palp: femur pd1; patella p1(0); tibia p2, v8; tarsus v7. Leg I: femur pd1; patella p1; tibia p1(0), v7; metatarsus v7(6). Leg II: femur pd1; patella p1; tibia p2, v7; metatarsus v7. Leg III: femur pd2, rd2; patella p2, r1; tibia d1, p2, r2, v7(5); metatarsus d2, p4, r4, v12(9). Leg IV: femur pd1, rd1; patella p1, r1; tibia d1, p3, r2, v7; metatarsus d1, p4, r4, v12(11).

SPERMATHECAE. Each of paired spermathecae Y-shaped with relatively long and narrow base carrying two unevenly conformed branches: inner branch longer, wider, flattened and subapically dilated; outer branch shorter, club-like, with long, narrow and strictly sclerotised proximal neck, and with short, more or less rounded subapical section ( Fig. 552 ).

SPINNERETS. See Figs 617–618 . PMS: length 0.38, diameter 0.17. PLS: maximal diameter 0.69; length of basal, medial and apical segments 1.08, 0.64, 0.63; total length 2.35; apical segment triangular.

Variation

Carapace length in males (n =11) varies from 4.37 to 5.83, in females (n=14) from 4.28 to 7.29. The colouration and other key somatic characters of males and females from Talas Mts as shown in Figs 35 , 77 , 135 , 165 , 195 , 228 , 255 , 289 , 378 . Variation in the structure of the spermathecae as shown in Figs 463–465 , 551, 553–554 .

Ecology

The species occurs in midland and highland montane belts, mostly in fragmentary woodlands composed of the spruce Picea schrenkiana Fisch. & C.A. Mey. and/or the fir Abies semenovii B. Fedtsch. , or in the mixed forest, with the participation of these coniferous trees and the walnut Juglans regia ( Figs 735– 738 ). The spiders were found exclusively in their retreats under stones and logs. Along the river valleys, this species can penetrate into the subalpine and alpine zones.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality. See Fig. 760 .

Data on natural history

Habitats

Depending on the altitude, prevailing landscape, precipitation regime and thermal conditions, all inhabited biotopes can be conditionally divided into three main zonal types. The first of these includes a harsh and periodically dry zone of foothills and low mountain ridges limited by lower and upper boundaries at altitudes of 450–500 m and 1000–1500 m, respectively. These biotopes are located mostly on loess substrate, on slopes covered with different types of xerophilic drought-resistant vegetation: from ephemeral semi-deserts to dense shrubland and sparse woodland composed of low sclerophyll trees ( Figs 619–626 , 715 ).

Similar to the Western Asian species of Raveniola , a higher level of species diversity in Central Asian congeners occurs in the most moist, mild and favorable midland-mountain forest zone (hosting 18 of the 29 regional species). However, compared with the western part of Asia, both the lower and the upper borders of this zone in the central part of the continent are at a higher altitude (which can be explained by the present-day continental climate of the region). Depending on the specific subregion, this zone can comprise a single and continuous area (as for example in southern Kyrgyzstan; Figs 720–721 , 731 ), or it can represent a mozaic of more or less isolated fragments (like those in Tajikistan and southern Uzbekistan, shown in Figs 631–632 , 699–700 , 708 ). Within Central Asia, the lower boundary of this zone is at an altitude of at least 750 m (in the western Kopetdagh Mts), but usually 1000–1500 m a.s.l.; the corresponding upper limit is confined to 2000–2300 m a.s.l.

Finally, the third group of biotopes is represented by highland landscapes, with juniper and coniferous forests, subalpine and alpine meadows and meadow-steppes on the rocky slopes ( Figs 627–628 , 651– 654 , 677–679, 682 , 717–718, 722 , 738 ). The lower edge of this zone is located at an altitude 2000–2300 m a.s.l. The highest altitudinal record for Central Asian Raveniola spp. is registered in this zone at an altitude of 3400–3700 m in Darvaz Mts, Tajikistan ( Andreeva 1975; 1976; under Brachythele sp. ).

Burrows and retreats

Sampling and direct observations on the ecology of Central Asian Raveniola spp. in the natural environment have shown that the majority of species do not dig their own burrows. Rather, these spiders exploit different natural refuges to hide themselves. In most cases, such refuges comprise cavities and hollows in the soil under stones, where the spiders thinly and scarcely line the bottom and walls with silk ( Figs 635–642 , 647–650 , 683–698 , 705–706 , 733–734 ). Several species, e.g., Raveniola cucullata sp. nov., are able to further deepen less suitable refuges ( Figs 633–634 ). In contrast, some adult females belonging to R. mikhailovi , R. nenilini sp. nov., R. virgata and R. vulpina sp. nov., when inhabiting moist slopes that are devoid of suitable stones and logs (as shown in Figs 724–726 , 731–732 ), can settle using natural open depressions adjacent to tree trunks.

The three species of the caudata group are mostly known from wandering males, which have occasionally been found under stones, used as temporary shelter during daytime. The only known female of Raveniola redikorzevi , however, as well as all the known juvenuiles of R. caudata and R. redikorzevi , were collected from abandoned burrows of gerbils ( Rhombomys opimus (Lichtenstein, 1823) , Meriones spp. ) and tortoises ( Agrionemys horsfieldii (Grey, 1844)) . Within the virgata species group, R. ovchinnikovi has also been found to hide deeply inside abandoned burrows of small vertebrate animals. Another uncommon econiche settled by the latter species is that of the natural deep crevices in outcrops of loess substrate. Finally, all hand-collected specimens of R. fedotovi were found inhabiting screes in woodlands under the tree canopy ( Figs 708–710 ).

Only a few Central Asian species of Raveniola are known to dig their own burrows. It is noteworthy that these burrowing species occurred closer to either the lower or the upper habitat limits of the Central Asian congeners, but are not found in the most favorable environments of the mid-mountain zone. The only species that inhabits the loess foothills of Western Tien Shan ( Fig. 715 ), with their long dry summer period, is R. ferghanensis , known as a strictly obligate burrower. In contrast, the four highland members of the concolor group, R. afghana sp. nov., R. alajensis sp. nov., R. hirta , sp. nov. and R. karategensis sp. nov., which inhabit the subalpine juniper forests, subalpine and alpine meadows, and meadow-steppes at an altitude of 1900–3700 m, have also been collected exclusively from their burrows. Raveniola insolita sp. nov., known only from a single male, which was collected at an altitude of 3300–3400 m, can probably also be assigned to the members of the latter subgroup.

Unlike the similarly unprotected holes dug and used by members of the obligate burrowing Central Asian genus Anemesia , the burrows of a few bothrobiont Raveniola spp. appear to be arranged more simply. Compared with the burrow structure found in Anemesia spp. (see Zonstein 2018b: figs 330–367), these burrows are almost similarly deep (ca 30–40 cm in length), but are noticeably narrower in their median part and much more scarcely silk lined (except for the terminal living chamber, which is more densely lined). The open entrance mostly lacks the silk lining and resembles a hole used by other terrestrial arthropods (the bothrobiont coleopterans, e.g., Lethrus spp. , or woodlice; see Figs 657 , 716 ). Sometimes this entrance is partially camouflaged by the surrounding detritus or vegetation ( Figs 655–656 , 661 ). A more complex variant of an entrance arrangement was observed in R. karategensis sp. nov., in which the burrow mouth was visibly silk lined and provided with a low rim ( Figs 659–665 ). The expanded living chamber always has a horizontal extension, as shown in Fig. 666 . In all cases, no lateral chambers connecting the burrow shaft with the soil surface were observed.

Phenology

Data on the phenology of the congeners are sparse and based completely on fragmentary field observations. The collecting data indicate that in localities with a dry summer period the wandering adult Raveniola males occur in April–May (the most wet and favourable period). In some species inhabiting this type of biotope, a second appearance of wandering males, connected with the end of a dry period in October– November, can be observed (particularly, in R. cucullata sp. nov., R. ferghanensis , and R. kopetdaghensis ). Several congeners, such as R. ignobilis sp. nov., R. subornata sp. nov. and R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov., are known as species with males collected only in October. In highland members of the genus, e.g., in R. alajensis sp. nov. and R. hirta sp. nov., the peak of their activity, including the presence of wandering adult males, unsurprisingly moves into the mid-summer (July). Males of the most mesophilic species, like R. virgata , within the humid areas (such as the midlands of the Ferghana Mts in the environs of Arslanbob, with summer rainfalls) can be almost evenly found from mid-April to late October.

Females with egg sacs can be found in July ( R. alajensis sp. nov., R. cucullata sp. nov., R. dolosa sp. nov., R. karategensis sp. nov., R. mikhailovi , R. pamira sp. nov., R. sororcula sp. nov. and R. tarabaevi sp. nov.), or in July and August ( R. virgata , R. vulpina sp. nov.). The egg sac usually reaches 12–19 mm in diameter and contais 25– 45 eggs.

Feeding

Some currently incomplete data, which nevertheless appear to fit the general trends, have been obtained for only two Central Asian species of the genus: Raveniola ferghanensis and R. virgata . These are only generalized data on the composition of the prey remains; no quantitative counts were made. The corresponding data for other regional congeners are fragmentary and not comparable to each other, and thus are not considered below.

In Raveniola ferghanensis , a major part of the “kitchen leftovers” retrieved from the bottom of the investigated burrows was represented by the head capsules and other fragmented parts of foraging ants ( Hymenoptera , Formicidae ), including the wandering predatory foragers Catagliphus aenescens (Nylander, 1849) , and the marching carpophagous ants Messor muticus (Nylander, 1849) and M. aralocaspius (Ruzsky, 1902) . The minor part of the chitinous remains, observed as leftovers in most of the studied burrows, belonged to burrowing arthropods, which share these biotopes with R. ferghanensis : the xerophilic terrestrial woodlice Hemilepistus fedtschenkoi (Uljanin, 1874) ( Isopoda , Agnaridae ) and the colonial coleopterans Lethrus spp. ( Coleoptera , Geotrupidae ). The latter remains tended to belong to either L. sulcipennis Kraatz, 1883 or L. micronatus Semenov, 1894 , or both sympatric species, which inhabit the same biotopes. Finally, some of the burrows contained remains of Madotrogus sp. aff. ferganensis (Protzenko, 1962) ( Coleoptera , Scarabaeidae ), as well as of some other unidentified representatives of Coleoptera .

Regarding Raveniola virgata , there are somewhat more complete data on the composition of their prey. Similar to the above, most of the prey remains were represented by a few ant species ( Hymenoptera , Formicidae ), but in this case by ants wandering through or nesting within the forest floor: Camponotus reichardti K. Arnoldi, 1967 , Messor rufus Santschi, 1923 and Myrmica juglandeti K. Arnoldi, 1976 . Most of the other collected and studied remains belonged to the following representatives of the Coleoptera : Carabidae : Chilotomus sp. aff. uzgentensis Shauberger, 1932 , Eocarterus uzgentensis Heyden, 1884 , Harpalus sp. , Leistus sp. aff. ferganensis Semenov & Znojko, 1928, Poecilus sp. , Pterostichus sp. aff. sodalicius Heyden, 1885, Trechus sp. ; Curculionidae : Asiodonus sp. , Polydrosus sp. ; Elateridae : Selastomus sp. ; Glaphyridae : Amphicoma sp. ; Staphylinidae : Philonthus sp. ; Tenebrionidae : Laena sp. , Zophohelops tiro (Reitter, 1902) . The remains of Ectobius delicatulus Bei-Bienko, 1950 (Blattoidea: Ectobiidae ) were more frequent, while fragments of Hessebius plumatus Zalesskaya, 1978 , Monotarsobium sp. ( Chilopoda, Lithobiidae ) and remnants of Dysdera sp. aff. arnoldii Charitonov, 1956 ( Araneae , Dysderidae ) were found in a few isolated cases.

Mating

Regarding Central Asian Raveniola spp. , fairly satisfactory data are available only for representatives of R. virgata kept in captivity (for details see Zonstein 2002c). The corresponding observations were carried out on October 20–22, 1992. To imitate the natural environment, observations were made at night, under dim lighting, in large cages for each pair, allowing greater mobility of males and females. Each female was placed in its cage one day before the male, enabling the females to find or to dig a refuge (which mostly resembled an open cavity between lumps of soil). After introducing a male into each cage, the sequence of events in most cases was as follows.

Having discovered the entrance to the female’s refuge, the male began to tap with the tips of the palps on the substrate, demonstrating a short courtship stage. When the female appeared, within a few seconds the male made several pedalling movements with the palps (resembling the pedalling of a cyclist). The male then stretched forward its first pair of legs, moved towards the female and approached her (see Figs 739–741 ). This is followed by touching the female with the tips of the male’s legs I for 3–4 seconds ( Fig. 742 ). Concurrently, the male’s legs II were also raised off the ground surface and began to vibrate, tapping the female’s legs.

A few seconds later, the male used its megaspines to grab the trochanters or femora of the female’s palps, gripping them on their proventral side ( Figs 743–744 ). The male then bent his first pair of legs at the tibiometatarsal joint and extended them upward. The male thereby closed the clamps, clasped the female’s palps, and lifted the female’s cephalothorax upward, so that the latter formed an angle with her abdomen, sometimes reaching almost 90° ( Figs 745–746 ). The entire operation lasted no more than 2–5 seconds. Following attachment, one of the emboli entered the spermathecal openings.

During each recorded phase of mating, the longest of them was the copulation process itself (from the initial insertion of the embolus into the copulatory organs of the female until its final removal). This stage is considered hereafter as the duration of copulation. All other stages – approach, initiation, coupling and uncoupling of the partners – took several seconds each.

The data obtained from laboratory observations on the copulation behavior in 20 pairs of R. virgata indicate that the duration of a basic insertion/removal act in this species varies from 27 seconds to 13 min. and 20 sec., averaging 6 min. and 13.2 sec. Usually, the entire copulation process ended with this single act. However, in six pairs a continuation was observed, associated with a one-time change of the involved palp. Even more rarely (three observations), a quadruple insertion of the emboli was detected. In the latter case, the total duration of copulation, which averaged about 10 min. for the examined specimens, increased up to 14–19 minutes. During copulation, the male continued to move towards the female, turning her onto her dorsal side. Having completed copulation, the male removed the involved embolus. Then, pressing on the female palpal femora, the male knocked the female over, climbing over her before the female could roll back.

According to a few observations of captive representatives of R. cucullata sp. nov., R. ferghanensis and R. nenilini sp. nov. (one, one, and two observed but not documented encounters, respectively), the courtship and copulation in these species occured in a similar way. In the natural environment, a copulating pair of R. virgata has incidentally been observed only once (see Zonstein 1987). In addition, this took place during the daytime, which was somewhat surprising, because such behavior cannot be considered characteristic for either nemesiids, or for mygalomorph spiders in general.

Predators

All known data on the predators interacting with and feeding on the Central Asian species of Raveniola refer only to a few taxa of spider wasps ( Hymenoptera , Pompilidae ). The pompilids that hunt and prey on these members of Raveniola belong to the pompiline genera Pareiocurgus Haupt, 1962 and Pamirospila Wolf, 1970 . Pareiocurgus latigena (F. Morawitz, 1893) is known from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and southern Kyrgyzstan. These wasps feed on several species of burrowing spiders, including R. ferghanensis and representatives of Anemesia ( Zonstein 2000b) . All five species of the endemic Central Asian genus Pamirospila (surveyed by Zonstein 2000b, 2002a, 2002b) are probably specialized predators feeding only on Raveniola spp. Pamirospila is confined to the same range as that of Raveniola in Central Asia. Additionally, at least twice, females of P. pamira (Haupt, 1930) have each been observed leaving a burrow of R. alajensis sp. nov., with the living chamber littered with soil lumps and with a paralyzed spider inside. A similar interaction has also been noted for R. hirta sp. nov. ( Zonstein 2000b).

Figures

Figs 28–35. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, habitus, lateral (28–30) and dorsal (31–35) views. 28–29. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), lectotype (MNHN 6506–B361). 30–33. R. virgata, four ♂♂ from surroundings of Arslanbob, demonstrating paler (30–31) and darker (32–33) types of colourations, including dorsal abdominal pattern (SMNH). 34. R. vulpina sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 35. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). Scale bars: 5.0 mm.

Figs 54–62. Raveniola spp., ♀♀, paratypes (except 59–60), habitus, dorsal views. 54. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (SMNH). 55. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 56–57. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021, from Aflatun (ZMMU) and Sary-Chelek Reserve (SMNH), respectively. 58. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 59. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 60. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♀ from Arslanbob (SMNH). 61–62. R. vulpina sp. nov., from Sary-Chelek Reserve and Tereksai (both SMNH), respectively. Scale bars: 5.0 mm.

Figs 76–81. Raveniola spp., ♂♂ (76, 78, 80) and ♀♀ (77, 79, 81), captured live spiders, dorsolateral views. 76–77. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). 78–79. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 80– 81. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (SMNH).

Figs 100–108. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes (except 107), cephalothorax, dorsal views. 100. R. zyuzini sp. nov. (SMNH). 101. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (ZISP). 102. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 103. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (ZISP). 104. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 105. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 106. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov. (SMNH). 107. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 108. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). Scale bars: 2.0 mm.

Figs 127–135. Raveniola spp., ♀♀, paratypes (except 132–133), cephalothorax, dorsal views. 127. R. zyuzinisp. nov. (SMNH). 128. R. ferghanensis(Zonstein, 1984) (SMNH). 129. R. kirgizicasp. nov. (SMNH). 130. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021, from Sary-Chelek Reserve (SMNH). 131. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 132. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 133. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), from Arslanbob (SMNH). 134–135. R. vulpina sp. nov., from Sary-Chelek Reserve and Tereksai (both SMNH), respectively. Scale bars: 2.0 mm.

Figs 160–171. Raveniola spp., ♂♂ (160–165) and ♀♀ (166–171), clypeus and eye tubercle, dorsal views. 160. R. nenilini sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 161. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 162. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 163. R. virgata, ♂ from Gava (SMF). 164. R. vulpina sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 165. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). 166. R. redikorzevi (Spassky, 1937), ♀ from Kepele (SMNH). 167. R. afghana sp. nov., holotype (NHMD). 168. R. alajensis sp. nov. (SMNH). 169. R. concolor Zonstein, 2000 (MCSN AR 19). 170– 171. R. cucullata sp. nov., paratypes from Shikildara and Shahob (SMNH), respectively. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 184–195. Raveniola spp., ♀♀, paratypes (except 191–193), clypeus and eye tubercle, dorsal views. 184. R. pallens sp. nov. (SMNH). 185. R. zyuzini sp. nov. (SMNH). 186. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (SMNH). 187. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 188–189. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021, from Aflatun (ZMMU) and Sary-Chelek Reserve (SMNH), respectively. 190. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 191. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 192–193. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♀♀ from Arslanbob (SMNH) and Gava (SMF), respectively. 194–195. R. vulpina sp. nov., from Sary-Chelek Reserve and Tereksai, respectively (both SMNH). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 220–228. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes (except 226, 228), sternum, labium and maxillae, ventral views. 220. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (ZISP). 221. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 222. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (ZISP). 223. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 224. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 225. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov. (SMNH). 226. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 227. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). 228. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 247–255. Raveniola spp., ♀♀, paratypes (except 252–253), sternum, labium and maxillae, ventral views. 247. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (SMNH). 248. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 249–250. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021, from Aflatun (ZMMU) and Karangitun (SMNH), respectively. 251. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 252. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 253. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♀ from Arslanbob (SMNH). 254–255. R. vulpina sp. nov., from Sary-Chelek Reserve and Tereksai, respectively (both SMNH). Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 282–289. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes (except 285–287, 289), tibia and metatarsus I, retrolateral views. 282. R. mikhailoviZonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 283. R. nenilinisp. nov. (SMNH). 284. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov. (SMNH). 285. R. ovchinnikovi, paratype (SMNH). 286. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 287. R. virgata, ♂ from Gava (SMF). 288. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). 289. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 290–309. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes (except 290, 294, 300, 302, 308), metatarsus I, ventral views. 290. R. redikorzevi (Spassky, 1937), ♂ from Akar-Cheshme (SMNH). 291. R. alajensis sp. nov. (SMNH). 292. R. concolor Zonstein, 2000 (MCSN AR 18). 293. R. cucullata sp. nov. (SMNH). 294. R. cucullata, paratype from Shahob (SMNH).295. R. dolosa sp. nov.(SMNH). 296. R. hirtasp. nov. (SMNH). 297. R. ignobilis sp. nov. (SMNH). 298. R. ornata sp. nov. (SMNH). 299. R. ornatula sp. nov. (SMNH). 300. R. ornatula, paratype (SMNH).301. R. pamirasp. nov. (SMNH). 302. R. pamira, paratype (SMNH). 303. R. diluta sp. nov. (SMNH). 304. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 305. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (ZISP). 306. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 307. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 308. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 309. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). Modified hairs are indicated with arrows. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 364–378. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes (except 366, 369, 376, 378), palpal tibia, cymbium and copulatory bulb, retrolateral (364–377) and retroventral (378) views. 364. R. pamira sp. nov. (SMNH). 365. R. diluta sp. nov. (SMNH). 366. R. fedotovi (Charitonov, 1946), lectotype (ZMMU). 367. R. pallens sp. nov. (SMNH). 368. R. zyuzini sp. nov. (SMNH). 369. R. zyuzini, paratype (SMNH). 370. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (ZISP). 371. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH).372. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (ZISP). 373. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). 374. R. nenilini sp. nov. (SMNH). 375. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov. (SMNH). 376. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 377. R. vulpina sp. nov. (SMNH). 378. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 457–465. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, details of copulatoty bulb, ventral (457–458, 462–464); retrolateral (459–460) and retroventral (461, 465) views. 457. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), ♂ from Jaradar (SMNH). 458. R. virgata, ♂ from Dashman (SMNH). 459–462. R. vulpina sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 463. R. vulpina, paratype from Kyrgolot (SMNH). 464–465. R. vulpina, paratype from Tereksai (SMNH). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 537–554. Raveniola spp., ♀♀, spermathecae, dorsal views. 537. R. kirgizica sp. nov., paratype (SMNH). 538. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021, female from Chapchama Pass (SMNH). 539– 540. R. mikhailovi, paratypes from Aflatun (ZMMU) and Sary-Chelek Reserve (SMNH), respectively. 541. R. nenilini sp. nov., female from Kamchik Pass (SMNH). 542–543. R. nenilini, paratypes from Kainarsai (SMNH). 544. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 545. R. tarabaevi, paratype from Uzunbulak (SMNH). 546. R. tarabaevi, paratype from Turgen (SMNH). 547. R. virgata (Simon, 1891), paralectotype (MNHN 6506-B361). 548–550. R. virgata, females from surroundings of Arslanbob (SMNH). 551–552. R. vulpina sp. nov., paratypes from Tumanyak (SMNH). 553–554. R. vulpina, from Tereksai (SMNH).Abbreviations: ld = lateral diverticulum; st = spermathecal trunk. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 611–618. Raveniola spp., ♀♀ (611, 613, 615, 617–618) and ♂♂ (612, 614, 616). Spinnerets, ventral (611–617) and subcaudal (618) views. 611. R. nenilini sp. nov., paratype from Mazarsai (SMNH). 612. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 613. R. tarabaevi sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 614– 615. R. virgata (Fet, 1984), from vicinity of Arslanbob (SMNH). 616. R. vulpina sp. nov., holotype (SMNH). 617–618. R. vulpina, paratype from Tumanyak (SMNH). Strictly reduced PMS indicated by white arrows. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 439–447. Raveniola spp., ♂♂, holotypes, details of copulatoty bulb; retroventral (439, 441, 444– 445), ventral (440, 442–443, 446) and proventral (447) views. 439–440. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (ZISP). 441–442. R. kirgizica sp. nov. (SMNH). 443–444. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (ZISP). 445–447. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 (SMNH). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 256–264. Raveniola spp., ♂♂; holotypes (except 260, 264), tibia and metatarsus I (256, 258, 260– 264) and tarsus IV (257, 259); retrolateral views. 256–257. R. caudata Zonstein, 2009 (SMNH). 258– 259. R. inopinatasp. nov. (SMNH). 260. R. redikorzevi(Spassky, 1937), ♂ fromAkar-Cheshme (SMNH). 261. R. alajensis sp. nov. (SMNH) 262. R. concolor Zonstein, 2000 (MCSN AR 18). 263. R. cucullata sp. nov. (SMNH). 264. R. cucullata, paratype from Shahob (SMNH). Modified hairs are indicated with arrows. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 731–738. Raveniola spp. Habitats of R. virgata (Simon, 1891) (731–734), and R. vulpina sp. nov. (735–738), Kyrgyzstan. 731. Ferghana Mts, forested slopes near Arslanbob Town. 732. Same, a montane walnut forest. 733–734. Same, the forest floor; a spider retreat under an overturned stone (showing a female and one of the protected juveniles indicated with white arrows). 735–737. Chatkal Mts (southern slope), Sary-Chelek Reserve, spruce woodlands.738. Talas Mts (southern slope), Uzun-Akhmat Canyon, slopes with montane steppes and fir woodlands.

Figs 751–760. Distribution records of Raveniola spp. 751. R. alajensis sp. nov. (), R. cucullata sp. nov. () and R. dolosa sp. nov. (). 752. R. hirta sp. nov. (), R. ignobilis sp. nov. () and R. insolita sp. nov. (). 753. R. karategensis sp. nov. (), R. ornata sp. nov. () and R. ornatula sp. nov. (). 754. R. pamira sp. nov. (), R. sororcula sp. nov. () and R. diluta sp. nov. (). 755. R. fedotovi (Charitonov, 1946) (), R. pallens sp. nov. () and R. zyuzini sp. nov. (). 756. R. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) () and R. kirgizica sp. nov. (). 757. R. kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) (). 758. R. mikhailovi Zonstein, 2021 () and R. nenilini sp. nov. (). 759. R. ovchinnikovi sp. nov. () and R. tarabaevi sp. nov. (). 760. R. virgata (Simon, 1891) (;? = the questionable type locality) and R. vulpina sp. nov. (). Country abbreviations as in Figs 747–750.

Figs 619–626. Raveniola spp., habitats of R. caudata Zonstein, 2009 (619–621), R. inopinata sp. nov. (622, SMNH), and R. redikorzevi (Spassky, 1937) (623–626), Tajikistan (619–622), and Turkmenistan (623–626). 619–620. Vahsh Karatau Mts and Aruktau Mts respectively. 621–622. Panj Karatau Mts, midland slopes at 1120 m a.s.l., and flattened summit area at 1500–1600 m a.s.l., respectively. 623–624. Zulfagar Mts, as seen from foothills and close to the top area, respectively. 625. Badhyz Plateau, Kyzyl- Djar Canyon. 626. Same, surroundings of Kepele Well (images courtesy of Victor Fet).

Figs 715–722. Raveniola spp., habitats ofR. ferghanensis (Zonstein, 1984) (715–716), R. kirgizicasp. nov. (717–718), R. kopetdaghensis(Fet, 1984) (719) and R. mikhailoviZonstein, 2021 (720–722); Kyrgyzstan (715, 717–718, 720–722), Uzbekistan (716) and Turkmenistan (719). 715. Foothills on the loess substrate, surroundings of Tash-Kumyr Town (courtesy of Alexander Zhdanko). 716. Burrow entance, semi-desertous environs of Pap Town. 717–718. Alay Mts (northern slope), montane juniper woodland. 719. Kopetdagh Mts, Aidere Canyon (courtesy of Vera Rezheninova and Victor Fet). 720–721. Chatkal Mts, Sary-Chelek Reserve. 722. Same, surroundings of Chapchama Pass.

Figs 627–634. Raveniola spp., habitats of R. alajensis sp. nov. (627–628) and R. cucullata sp. nov. (629 –634), together with a partially sympatric congener, R. ignobilis sp. nov. (629–631), Kyrgyzstan (627– 628), and Tajikistan (629–634). 627–628. Trans-Alay Mts, as seen from the Alay Valley, and highland biotopes, respectively. 629–630. Hazratisho Mts, as seen from the neighboring montane slopes, and closer midland area, respectively.631. Same, Kapar (Sangdara) River valley. 632. Vahsh Mts, Mullokoni Canyon. 633–634. Same, a spider retreat under an overturned stone, showing spiderlings (indicated with white arrows).

Figs 699–706. Habitats and retreats of Raveniola diluta sp. nov., Tajikistan, Hissar Mts (south slope). 699–700. Rocky slopes with shrubland and woodland fragments, Sorbo Canyon, 1500–1800 m a.s.l. 701–702. Same, Saidai-Miyona Canyon, 1400–1500 m. 703–704. A rocky forest floor under the tree canopy. 705. An aside opened spider retreat under an overturned stone (indicated with a white arrow). 706. Same, close-up view.

Figs 707–714. Raveniola spp., habitats of R. fedotovi (Charitonov, 1946) (707–710) and R. zyuzini sp. nov. (711–714), Uzbekistan. 707. Hissar Mts (northwestern slope), montane slopes south of Ishkent Village. 708. Zeravshan Mts, Kitab Reserve, Hojakurgan Canyon. 709–710. Same, a rocky substrate under the tree canopy. 711. Babatagh Mts, as seen from foothills. 712. Same, as seen from the midland zone (ca 1200 m a.s.l.). 713–714. Same, the collection sites at 1400 m and 1800 m a.s.l., respectively.

Figs 651–658. Habitats and burrows of R. hirta sp. Tajikistan, Darvaz Mts. 651. Haburabot Pass, as seen from a road observation site, at 2500 m a.s.l. 652. Same, the top pass area at 3300 m. 653–654. Same, the collection site at 2850–2900 m a.s.l. 655–656. Burrow entrance hidden in the grass. 657. Same, decamouflaged. 658. Same, the burrow was partially dug out and destroyed by a collector to demonstrate the absence of silk lining.

Figs 675–682. Raveniola spp., habitats of R. insolita sp. nov. (675, 677), R. karategensis sp. nov. (675, 678, 679), and R. pamira sp. nov. (676, 680–682), Tajikistan. 675. Obihingou River valley, with Peter I Mts left and Darvaz Mts right. 676. Darvaz Mts, near Miyonadu Village. 677. Peter I Mts, highlands (2500–3500 m a.s.l.). 678. Same, sparse juniper forest at 1800–2300 m a.s.l. 679. Same, Harvikush Canyon (ca 1900 m a.s.l.). 680. Same, surroundings of Childara (2100 m a.s.l.). 681. Darvaz Mts, Obiviskharvi Canyon, riverside woodland at 2200 m a.s.l. 682. Same, highland alpine meadows on rocky slopes (3000–3400 m a.s.l.).

Figs 635–642. Retreats of Raveniola cucullata sp. nov., Tajikistan, Peter I Mts, surroundings of Shahob. When distantly viewed, the depicted retreat and spider are indicated with a white arrow.

Figs 643–650. Raveniola spp., habitats of two sympatric congeners, R. cucullata sp. nov. and R. dolosa sp. nov. (643–646), and retreats used by representatives of the latter species (647–650). Tajikistan, Peter I Mts, surroundings of Shahob.

Figs 683–690. Retreats of Raveniola pamira sp. nov., Tajikistan, Darvaz Mts, Obiviskharvi Canyon, near abandoned Viskharvi-Bolo Village (2100 m a.s.l.). When distantly viewed/poorly visible, the depicted retreats and spiders are indicated with a white arrow.

Figs 691–698. Retreats of Raveniola sororcula sp. nov. and live females protecting their egg sacs. Tajikistan, Darvaz Mts, Obiviskharvi Canyon, surroundings of Hurk Village (1700 m a.s.l.).

Figs 723–730. Habitats of Raveniola nenilini sp. nov., Uzbekistan. 723. Pskem River valley and Charvak Reservoir, with Ugam Mts left and Pskem Mts right. 724. Ugam Mts, Kainarsai Gorge. 725– 726. Same, a walnut forest growing in a ravine. 727. Karzhantau Mts, Humsan Canyon. 728. Chimgan Mts, Gulikamsai Gorge. 729. Chatkal Mts (western slope), Aksakata Canyon, northwestern slope of Mt Syurenata. 730. Same, midland juniper woodland on rocky slopes (ca 1700 m a.s.l.).

Figs 659–666. Habitats and burrows ofRaveniola karategensis sp. nov. Tajikistan, Peter I Mts, Harvikush Canyon. 659–660, 663. Burrow entrances on the woodland floor. 661–662, 664–665. Same, close-up view. 666. A female dug out from its burrow. When distantly viewed, the depicted retreat and spider are indicated with a white arrow.

Figs 739–746. Copulation in Raveniola virgata (Simon, 1891). The depicted phases are explained in the text (p. 86).