Rhyacophila mikusi, Kiss, Ottó, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.4.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9600AA55-4657-4C7D-BEBC-5AA7DA115B53 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6142805 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF87F1-FFBD-F355-FF08-FD071661F832 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhyacophila mikusi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhyacophila mikusi , new species
Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 3
Male. Body length of single known specimen 5.5 mm, length of each forewing 7.4 mm, width of each forewing 2.9 mm, length of each antenna 4.8 mm. Body, antennae, palpi, wings, abdomen and legs dark brown.
Male genitalia ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Segment IX (IX., Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) subrectangular, longitudinally shorter (narrower) lateroventrally in lateral view and subquadrate with a small notch in middle of posterior margin in dorsal view. Apicodorsal portion of segment X ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) triangular with blunt and obtuse distal angle and sinuous dorsal margin in lateral view, basoventral portion in lateral profile finger-like; horseshoe-like with tiny blunt teeth on inner surface in dorsal view. Pair of anal sclerites (a.s., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) bulging in lateral view. Apical band (a.b., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) sack-like in lateral view. Also in lateral view, tergal strap (t.s., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) sclerotized with short sclerotized apicolateral arms (s.t., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). First segment of each inferior appendage (f.s., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) trapezoidal, proximal margin taller than distal margin, longer than parameres; second joint of each inferior appendage (s.j., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) with rounded dorsal apex and with lobe-like ventral part, elongate caudad in lateral view, distal edge densely covered with tiny spines. Phallotheca (phal., Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) longitudinally short, tall; dorsal appendage (d.ap., Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) short, stout process arising from endotheca (end., Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ); phallicata (ph., Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) wide-based, long tube, curved upwards with blunt apex, narrowing at 1/3rd distance from base; phallicata ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) without ventral lobe; parameres (par., Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ) longer than segments IX–X and twice as long as phallicata, each resembling elongate half willow leaf with slightly bent ventral margin and with six huge dorsal spines.
Female. Unknown.
Holotype: ♂, TAIWAN: 20 km E of Tungshih, Prov. Miaoli, ( Republic of China), 24o19’N, 121o03’E, 1335 m elevation, by light trapping, 18 October 1995, leg. Tibor Csővári and Pál Stéger (gen. prep. No. 119, Ottó Kiss, coll. Mátra Museum).
Differential diagnosis: This species belongs to the Rhyacophila yosiiana Group of the R. philopotamoides Branch ( Schmid 1970) . The male genitalia of the new species are similar to those of Rhyacophila ulmeri Navás 1907 (p. 399) from China (Thian-Shan), ( Ross 1956, pp. 93 and 119, fig. 213) and Rhyacophila kaoshiungensis Hsu & Chen 2003 (pp. 151–153, figs 1–3) from Taiwan, but differs from them in that:
1. Segment X is horseshoe-shaped in dorsal view (without a mesal protuberance like that of R. ulmeri and not as broadly bowl-shaped as in R. kaoshiungensis ).
2. The anal sclerites are present (absent in R. ulmeri and R. kaoshiungensis ).
3. The phallicata is a long tube, curved upward with blunt apex (not a short tube with an acute apex as in R. ulmeri and R. kaoshiungensis ).
4. Each paramere has 6 huge spines along most of the length of its dorsal margin (dorsal margin with smaller subapical spines in R. ulmeri and margin serrate in R. kaoshiungensis ).
5. The second joint of each inferior appendage has a rounded dorsal apex (not an acute dorsal apex as in R. ulmeri ).
Etymology. Named for László Mikus, who collected Trichoptera in Taiwan and donated them to me.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |