Rhyphelia otti, Nobre & Ruiz, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5418.5.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20F7368E-110A-4D71-9E28-ABBBA2EEC9C5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10793298 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD87C1-2133-DE69-FF35-A734F7D9FD49 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhyphelia otti |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhyphelia otti sp. nov.
Figs 5E–5F View FIGURE 5 , 6A–6D View FIGURE 6 , 7C–7G View FIGURE 7
Type material. Holotype: ♂ from Centro de Pesquisas e Conservação da Natureza Pró-Mata, São Francisco de Paula, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 02.I.2001, R. Ott leg. (MCN/FZBRS-39661) . Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype (MCN/FZBRS-39661) .
Etymology. Epithet is in honour of the Brazilian arachnologist Ricardo Ott, who collected the type specimens.
Diagnosis. Among the species of the genus, the male of R. otti sp. nov. is most similar to that of R. barbado sp. nov., as it has an elongated and flattened embolus, almost parallel to the longitudinal axis, with a fold at the most apical region (compare Figs 7A, 7C View FIGURE 7 ). The male of R. otti sp. nov. can be distinguished by the smooth embolus axis ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ; embolus bearing a membranous lamella on the prolateral side in S. barbado sp. nov., Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Among the species with known females, R. otti sp. nov. is most similar to R. ruizi ( Zhang & Maddison, 2015) comb. nov., given their narrow, inverted V-shaped coupling pocket, but it can be distinguished by the longer loop in the middle portion of the copulatory duct ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ; smaller loop in R. ruizi , see Zhang & Maddison 2015: figs 279–280).
Description. Male holotype. Total length: 3.18. Carapace brown, 1.68 long, 1.2 wide, 0.86 high. Cephalic region dark brown ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Ocular quadrangle 0.77 long; anterior eye row 1.17 wide, posterior 1.03 wide. Chelicera, labium, sternum and palp light brown ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Palpal tibia short with acute RTA pointing the center of tegulum ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); ovoid tegulum with large paraembolic distal haematodocha ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Leg formula: 1342; length of legs: I 3.21 (1.08 + 0.5 + 0.77 + 0.53 + 0.33); II 2.41 (0.82 + 0.36 + 0.46 + 0.46 + 0.31); III 3.12 (1.08 + 0.48 + 0.65 + 0.58 + 0.33); IV 2.95 (0.94 + 0.36 + 0.60 + 0.72 + 0.33). Legs I: femur, patella and tibia brown; metatarsus and tarsus brown and yellow; II–IV: femora and patellae brown; tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi brown and yellow. Tibia I macrosetae well developed, with tips of a more proximal pair surpassing insertions of the spines of a more distal pair. Abdomen dorsally light brown, with a pair of circular yellowish spots anteriorly, and a yellow crescent-shaped spot posteriorly ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ); ventrally light brown with a dark brown band that extends longitudinally ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Spinnerets yellow.
Female paratype. Total length: 3.48. Carapace as in male ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ), 1.56 long, 1.15 wide, 0.79 high. Ocular quadrangle 0.77; anterior eye row 1.10 wide, posterior 1.03 wide. Chelicera, labium and sternum light brown ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ). Palp whitish. Leg formula: 1432; length of legs: I 2.87 (0.96 + 0.36 + 0.74 + 0.48 + 0.33); II 2.37 (0.77 + 0.36 + 0.48 + 0.43 + 0.33); III 2.58 (0.86 + 0.36 + 0.48 + 0.55 + 0.33) IV 2.85 (0.84 + 0.36 + 0.60 + 0.72 + 0.33). Legs I–II whitish ( Figs 6C–6D View FIGURE 6 ), with a small brown spot on the anterior region of the tibia; III–IV: femora and patellae brown; tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi brown and yellow. Macrosetae as in male. Abdomen dorsally light brown, with two pairs of rounded light-colored spots, in addition to a series of clear chevrons ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ); ventrally brown ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ). Epigyne with large copulatory openings, long S-shaped ducts before connecting to the elongate spermathecae ( Figs 7E–7G View FIGURE 7 ).
Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |