Selenophorus neoruficollis Messer and Raber, 2021

Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame, 2021, Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets, The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1), pp. 9-55 : 42-43

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.21227/ybfj-me86

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ACA32B-FF9F-FFB8-2DB4-163FFE2CFAF6

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Selenophorus neoruficollis Messer and Raber
status

sp. nov.

Selenophorus neoruficollis Messer and Raber View in CoL , new species

zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FA0C636F-55A1-419D-A459-930589FD3643 ( Figs. 55–58 View Figs )

Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled “USA: TX: Brazos Co. / 5 km SW Wellborn / 30.5022N 96.3360W / 1-7.vi.2018 / @ lights V. Belov ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial GoogleMaps . Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: LOUISIANA: Natchitoches Par.: Kisatchie N.F ., 9 IX 2010 (1♀ CMNH) . TEXAS: Bastrop Co.: 23 VII 1988 (1♀ TAMU) ; Brazos Co .: 28 X 1996 (1♀ TAMU) ; Riley Estate , 4 X 2002 (2♂ TAMU) ; 18 IX 2005 (1♂ TAMU) ; 9–15 IX 2010 (1♀ CMNH) ; 5km SW Wellborn , 20–31 VII 2016 (1♂ 2♀ PWMC); 4–18 VIII 2016 (1♂ 1♀ PWMC); 10–16 IX 2016 (1♀ PWMC, 1♂ 2♀ TAMU) ; 4–29 X 2016 (2♂ 1♀ PWMC, 3♂ 6♀ TAMU, 1♂ 1♀ BTRC, 1♀ MPM) ; 2–4 XI 2016 (1♂ PWMC, 1♂ BTRC); XI–XII 2016 (1♀ BTRC, 1♀ TAMU) ; 27 III 2017 (1♀ BTRC) ; 20 IV 2017 (1♂ TAMU) ; 14–26 V 2017 (2♀ TAMU) ; 1–26 VI 2017 (1♂ 3♀ TAMU, 2♂ 2♀ CNCI, 1♀ BTRC, 2♂ 2♀ DAHC) ; 2–20 VII 2017 (1♂ 2♀ TAMU, 1♀ BTRC); 25–30 IX 2017 (3♀ TAMU, 1♂ USNM) ; 2–23 X 2017 (2♂ 7♀ TAMU, 3♂ BTRC); 1–15 XI 2017 (1♀ TAMU, 3♀ BTRC) ; 8–31 V 2018 (1♂ 3♀ TAMU, 2♂ 2♀ USNM, 1♂ 2♀ UASM, 1♂ 2♀ UTA) ; 1–30 VI 2018 (1♀ TAMU, 2♂ 2♀ FSCA, 1♂ UASM, 1♂ UTA) , 1–31 VII 2018 (4♀ TAMU, 1♂ 2♀ USNM) ; 4–20 IX 2018 (2♂ 2♀ AMNH, 1♂ 4♀ TAMU); 5 km SW Wellborn : same data as holotype except various dates GoogleMaps 25 III–27 XI 2018 (8♂ 3♀ TAMU) ; TAMU Campus , 15 III 2016 (1♀ TAMU) ; 15–16 X 2016 (2♀ TAMU) .

Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 5.2 mm. Color/Luster: Dorsal color as for that of species group. Antennomeres 1 — 3, mouthparts, legs, and much of venter testaceous; abdomen darker. Elytra strongly iridescent. Microsculpture: Pronotum with mesh obsolete. Elytra with striate microsculpture weakly impressed, more distinct laterally. Head: HW/PW = 0.76. Eyes moderately large. Pronotum: PL/PW = 0.67. Sides convergent nearly straight toward distinct obtuse hind angles. Base smooth, impunctate. Elytra: Common structural features of the species group. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with sparse, inconspicuous pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 2 pairs of anal setae.

Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Metatarsi dorsally with conspicuous setae. Median lobe: Dorsoapical plate moderately long, with prominent but short, curved dorsal hook. Endophallus with massive lamina filling large ostium; proximally with 2 dark parallel fields of long microtrichia or slender spines.

Variation. ABL 4.5–5.2 mm. Females with microsculpture distinctly striate on elytra, weakly striate on pronotum; tarsi unmodified; 2 pairs of anal setae as in males.

Etymology. The specific name is derived from Greek neo (new) prefixed to ruficollis , in reference to the close resemblance to S. ruficollis .

Diagnosis. Selenophorus neoruficollis is distinguished from the other two species in the S. ruficollis species group by its limited northern range in southcentral USA and the presence of dorsal microsculpture that is not well impressed. In addition, males have a massive lamina in the ostium.

Type Habitat. The holotype was collected approximately 5 km SW of the city of College Station, Texas, within half a mile of the Brazos River.This area is located within the Post Oak Savannah Ecoregion of central Texas and is characterized by rolling hills with sandy soils and scattered clumps of trees, primarily post oaks. Forested bottom lands along creeks and rivers typically have clay-loam or clay soils.

Remarks. Compared to S. neoruficollis , S. pararuficollis of South America is slightly larger; dorsal microsculpture strongly impressed; elytra only faintly iridescent; pronotum with hind angles clearly subdentate, sides more evenly curved, finely rugose basomedially; antennomeres slightly longer; venter with dense, conspicuous pubescence; same sexual dimorphism + ♂ 2 — ♀ 2. See the holotype account for S. pararuficollis below.

CMNH

The Cleveland Museum of Natural History

TAMU

Texas A&M University

MPM

Milwaukee Public Museum

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Carabidae

Genus

Selenophorus

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF