Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives, 2005 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.31.1.09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10978661 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A087E6-EA5B-FF8B-FED4-CDF73E1A78F9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives, 2005 ) |
status |
|
Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives, 2005) View in CoL
Figs 3–7 View Figs 1–7 , 11, 13, 15, 19 View Figs 8–19 , 21, 23, 25, 27.
Elydnus huedepohli Vives, 2005: 246 View in CoL . Type locality: Indonesia, Kalimantan (according to the original description), “Borneo — S Kalimantan (see Note below)” (according to the label of the holotype); Heffern, 2013: 10.
Spinidymasius huedepohli View in CoL : Miroshnikov, 2017: 191, 194.
MATERIAL. Holotype, ♂ (cEV) ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1–7 ), “ Borneo — S Kalimantan , 03 — 2000”, “ Elydnus hüdepoli (sic) nov. Holotipo ♂ E. Vives leg. (sic) 02”, “Holotype ♂ ”, “ Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives) E. Vives det. 2018” ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1–7 ); 1♀ ( NHMD) ( Figs 6 View Figs 1–7 , 11 View Figs 8–19 ), E Malaysia, Sabah, Crocker Range, 03.2003, local collector, “ Elydnus ochraceovittatus Hüdepohl, Ole Mehl det. 2005” , “ Spinidymasius? huedepohli ( Vives, 2005) ♀ det. A. Miroshnikov 2017 ”, “ Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives, 2005) ♀ det. A. Miroshnikov 2021” ; 1♂, 1♀ (cDH) (photographs; Figs 4, 7 View Figs 1–7 ), E Malaysia, Sabah, Trus Madi Mt., 1500–2000 m, III–V.1998, local collector, “ Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives) det. D. Heffern ” ; 1♂ (cDH) (photograph), Indonesia (Borneo), E Kalimantan, Balikpapan , II.2000, local collector, “ Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives) det. D. Heffern ”.
REMARKS. This species was described on the basis of single male with a body length of 30 mm and a humeral width of 7 mm. The males kept in the collection of Daniel J. Heffern (Houston, USA; his personal communication of November 25, 2021) are smaller, 24–26 mm in length.
Female features are given here for the first time.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEMALE ( Figs 3, 7 View Figs 1–7 , 11, 15 View Figs 8–19 , 27). Closely resembles a male. Body length 24.8–25.0 mm, humeral width 5.9–5.95 mm.
Antennae reaching beyond apex of elytra by apical part of penultimate antennomere; length ratio of antennomeres 1– 11, 47: 15: 60: 39: 39: 69: 72: 66: 58: 50: 57 (female from NHMD taken as an example); antennomere 3, unlike male, without coarse folds; spine at apical inner angle of antennomeres 6–10 more strongly developed than that in male; last antennomere apically drawn into a sharp spine.
Pronotum distinctly longitudinal, 1.15–1.16 times as long as wide; base 1.31–1.33 times as wide as apex.
Elytra moderately narrowed towards apex, 2.54–2.7 times as long as humeral width; external angle drawn into a long, relatively robust, sharp spine, apical sutural angle clearly toothed like in male, as in Figs 13, 15 View Figs 8–19 .
Last (visible) abdominal sternite widely rounded apically; last (visible) abdominal tergite truncate at apex.
Genitalia as in Fig. 27 View Figs 20–27 ; styles nearly parallel-sided, not narrowed towards apex, at the very apex weakly sloped.
NOTE. Judging by the label ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1–7 ), the holotype was most likely collected in South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia.
DISTRIBUTION. Borneo.
NHMD |
NHMD |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Spinidymasius huedepohli ( Vives, 2005 )
Miroshnikov, A. I. 2022 |
Spinidymasius huedepohli
Miroshnikov A. I. 2017: 191 |
Elydnus huedepohli
Heffern D. J. 2013: 10 |
Vives E. 2005: 246 |