Stenaelurillus solapur Kuni, Tripathi & Kadam, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.930.2485 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A632824-429B-4EAB-9ED0-B7683140FBA1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10903624 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/454BDEF1-E170-4155-8EE5-E324A7A10BCF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:454BDEF1-E170-4155-8EE5-E324A7A10BCF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stenaelurillus solapur Kuni, Tripathi & Kadam |
status |
sp. nov. |
Stenaelurillus solapur Kuni, Tripathi & Kadam sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:454BDEF1-E170-4155-8EE5-E324A7A10BCF
Figs 11–14 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 15D View Fig , 16 View Fig
Common name: Solapur jumping spider
Diagnosis
Males of S. solapur sp. nov. are close to those of S. sarojinae Caleb & Mathai, 2014 due to the similarity in their palpal structures, but they can be distinguished by the absence of the palpal femoral apophysis and differences in the shape and position of the embolic apophysis (compare Figs 11 View Fig , 12A–D View Fig , 13A–F View Fig , 14A–B View Fig with Caleb et al. 2015: figs 57–61, 63–81; Marathe et al. 2022: figs 28–29, 32–33, 36–37, 40–48). Females are also most similar to those of S. sarojinae Caleb & Mathai, 2014 by having large centrally placed copulatory openings, but can be differentiated by absence of epigynal coupling pocket (compare Figs 13G–H View Fig , 14C–D View Fig with Marathe et al. 2022: figs 30–31, 34–35).
Etymology
The specific epithet, ‘ solapur ’, is derived from the vibrant city located in Maharashtra, India. This epithet was chosen to honour the geographical significance and unique ecological characteristics of the type locality.
Type material
Holotype INDIA • ♂; Maharashtra, Solapur, Mulegaon area ; 17°40′12.1″ N, 75°58′08.2″ E; 330 m alt.; 13 Apr. 2023; N. Kuni leg.; from ground, by hand; NRC-AA-6957 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes INDIA • 1 ♀, same collecting data as for the holotype; NRC-AA-6959 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collecting data as for the holotype; NRC-AA-6958 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype, Figs 11 View Fig , 12A–D View Fig )
Measurements: Body length 3.91. Carapace length 1.96, width 1.41. Abdomen length 1.95, width 1.19. Ocular area length 0.79, width 1.14. Eye diameters: AME 0.33, ALE 0.21, PME 0.08, PLE 0.22. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.02, AME–ALE 0.03, PME–PME 1.06, ALE–ALE 0.79, PME–PLE 0.16, PLE–PLE 0.94, ALE–PME 0.28, ALE–PLE 0.50. Length of chelicera 0.40. Clypeus 0.17. Sternum 0.82 long, 0.51 wide. Endite 0.15 long, 0.19 wide. Labium 0.08 long, 0.13 wide. Measurement of palp and legs: Palp 1.26 [0.45, 0.15, 0.12, 0.54], leg I 2.65 [0.95, 0.42, 0.60, 0.35, 0.33], II 2.51 [0.88, 0.36, 0.57, 0.35, 0.35], III 4.32 [1.39, 0.50, 1.01, 0.92, 0.50], IV 4.17 [1.21, 0.42, 0.90, 1.03, 0.61]. Leg formula: 4312. Setation. Palp: femur do 1; Legs: femur I pld 1 do 5 rld 1, II pld 1 do 5 rld 2, III pld 2 do 5 rld 1, IV do 5 rld 1; patellae I–II pld 1, III–IV pld 1 rld 1; tibia I plv 3 rlv 3, II pl 2 plv 1 rl 1 rld 1 rlv 3, III pl 2 pld 1 plv 2 do 1 rl 2 rld 1 rlv 1, IV pl 2 pld 1 plv 2 do 2 rl 2 rld 1 rlv 1; metatarsus I pl 2 pld 1 plv 2 rld 1 rlv 2, II pl 2 pld 1 plv 2 rl 2 rld 1 rlv 2, III pl 2 pld 2 plv 2 do 1 rl 2 rld 2 rlv 2; IV pl 2 pld 2 plv 3 do 1 rl 2 rld 2 rlv 2; tarsi I–IV spineless. Carapace elongated, wider than abdomen, brownish clothed with largely black and few pale brown setae; thoracic region dorsally with paired pale white longitudinal bands extending back from the AMEs, narrow distally; with a pair of additional bands along the margin ( Figs 11B–D View Fig , 12A–B View Fig ) Eye field with long black setae, intermixed with small, rusty brown and white setae ( Figs 11A View Fig , 12C View Fig ). Clypeus black, hirsute with small white setae ( Figs 11A View Fig , 12C View Fig ). Chelicerae small, dorsally with long white setae ( Fig. 12C View Fig ). Legs pale brown; femora and patellae I–IV prolaterally with orangish yellow scales; tibia and metatarsus I ventrally covered dense with black setae ( Figs 11A–B View Fig , 12A, D View Fig ). Abdomen anterior edge with long black setae, intermixed with white setae; with a pair of longitudinal pale brown wide stripes forming V-shaped pattern in its anterior half; a pair of white, unevenly shaped spots at rear half and a small ventral stripe to its basal half ( Figs 11C–D View Fig , 12A View Fig ). Palp ( Figs 13A–F View Fig , 14A–B View Fig ): with brown segments. Femur without any projections; ventral tibial apophysis absent; retrolateral tibial apophysis tiny, straight directed at 12 o’clock laterally ( Figs 13B View Fig , 14B View Fig ). Tegulum with well-developed proximal projection, straight with rounded end; and disc-shaped tegular process ( Figs 13A–B View Fig , 14A–B View Fig ). Embolus 2.5 times as long as apophysis, with conical tip directed at 12 o’clock position in ventral view; embolus accompanied apophysis tiny, prolaterally located tip directed at 11 o’clock position (13A, C, 14A).
Female (paratype, Figs 12E–H View Fig )
Measurements: Body length 5.88. Carapace length 2.83, width 1.92. Abdomen length 3.05, width 2.31. Ocular area length 0.94, width 1.35. Eye diameters: AME 0.37, ALE 0.23, PME 0.08, PLE 0.22. Eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.08, PME–PME 1.23, ALE–ALE 0.98, PME–PLE 0.17, PLE–PLE 1.10, ALE–PME 0.30, ALE–PLE 0.54. Length of chelicera 0.66. Clypeus 0.27. Sternum 0.92 long, 0.62 wide. Endite 0.25 long, 0.27 wide. Labium 0.13 long, 0.14 wide. Measurement of palp and legs: Palp 1.68 [0.62, 0.24, 0.26, 0.56], leg I 3.14 [1.17, 0.48, 0.72, 0.36, 0.41], II 3.19 [1.16, 0.48, 0.68, 0.41, 0.46], III 5.46 [1.61, 0.61, 1.18, 1.40, 0.66], IV 5.60 [1.88, 0.49, 1.49, 1.18, 0.56]. Leg formula: 4312. Setation. Palp: femur I do 1; Legs: femora I and IV pld 1 do 5 rld 1, II pld 1 do 5 rld 2, III pld 2 do 5 rld 1; patellae I–II pld 1, III–IV pld 1 rld 1; tibia I pld 2 plv 2 rlv 2, II pld 2 plv 1 rlv 3, III pld 1 pl 1 plv 1 do 1 rld 2 rl 2 rlv 2, IV pl 2 pld 2 plv 1 do 1 rl 2 rld 2 rlv 2; metatarsus I pl 1 pld 2 plv 2 rl 1 rlv 2, II pld 1 pl 1 plv 2 rlv 2, III pld 2 pl 1 plv 2 do 2 rld 2 rl 1 rlv 2, IV pl 2 pld 2 plv 2 do 1 pl 2 pld 2 plv 2; tarsi I–IV spineless. General aspects essentially as in male except the followings: coloration and pattern less bright and contrast ( Fig. 12E View Fig ). Clypeus and chelicerae with scattered small white setae, intermixed with black setae; additionally with black stain laterally on clypeus with brown blotches ( Fig. 12F View Fig ). Chelicerae comparatively long ( Fig. 12F View Fig ). Abdomen oval-shaped; chevron pattern at posterior end ( Fig. 12E View Fig ). Femur I prolaterally with very few orangish yellow scales ( Fig. 12G View Fig ). Venter pale brownish with rows of black speckles on lateral margins ( Fig. 12H View Fig ). Epigyne and vulva ( Figs 13G–H View Fig , 14C–E View Fig ): epigyne hirsute, longer than wide ( Fig. 13G View Fig , 14C View Fig ); Copulatory openings small, widely spaced, mediolaterally originating ( Figs 13G View Fig , 14C View Fig ). Copulatory ducts short, running along the spermathecae ( Figs 13H View Fig , 14D View Fig ). Spermathecae C-shaped, medially placed, adjacent ( Figs 13H View Fig , 14D View Fig ). Fertilization ducts long, diverging ( Figs 13H View Fig , 14D View Fig ).
Natural history
Stenaelurillus solapur sp. nov. was encountered in a compact and fragmented semi-arid grassland patch, where it sought refuge under the shade of Neem trees ( Azadirachta indica A.Juss. ). Adult males showcase remarkable agility, characterized by swift movements and impressive long jumps. In response to disturbances, they demonstrate a tendency to seek shelter under leaf litter or within ground crevices. The species’ body coloration effectively blends with the dried Neem leaves, providing excellent camouflage and enhancing their concealment within the habitat.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Solapur, Maharashtra, India.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Salticinae |
Tribe |
Aelurillini |
SubTribe |
Aelurillina |
Genus |