Tanytydeus simplex (Delfinado and Baker, 1974) Khaustov, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4303.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3FAFE179-A7AF-4755-8AB7-B1FC4CD9F8A3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6051850 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1124C97E-FFE6-FF81-A981-7B01FB57FDE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tanytydeus simplex (Delfinado and Baker, 1974) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Tanytydeus simplex (Delfinado and Baker, 1974) comb. nov.
( Figs. 33–36 View FIGURE 33 View FIGURE 34 View FIGURE 35 View FIGURE 36 )
Scolotydaeus simplex Delfinado and Baker, 1974 , p. 207, figs. 17–22.
Description. FEMALE ( Figs. 33–36 View FIGURE 33 View FIGURE 34 View FIGURE 35 View FIGURE 36 ). Length of idiosoma 475, width 165. Gnathosoma . Palptarsus with three eupathidia (ul’ eupathidion-like). Subcapitular setae n distinctly longer than subequal m and or 1-2. Idiosomal dorsum ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 A). Dorsal idiosomal setae smooth. Dorsal idiosomal setae c 1, d, e, f 1, h 1, ps 1, ad 1 blunt-ended; other dorsal setae pointed. Hysterosoma with transverse furrows between setal rows d-e, e-f and h-ps, respectively. Cupules im situated anterolaterally to setae e, cupules ip situated laterally to setae f 1 and anteromedially to setae f 2. Idiosomal venter ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 B). Setae 3 c, ps 2 and ad 2 blunt-ended, smooth; other ventral setae pointed. Genital area with four pairs of simple aggenital setae and 5–6 pairs of genital setae ( Fig. 34 View FIGURE 34 ). Genital opening with three pairs of genital acetabulae. Third pair of genital acetabulae smaller than first and second pairs. Cupules ia situated anterolaterally to setae 3 a near lateral margin of the body; cupules ih situated laterally to setae ag 4 near lateral margin of body. Lengths of idiosomal setae: ve 12, sci 48, sce 23, c 1 13, c 2 49, d 14, e 14, f 1 15, f 2 40, h 1 23, h 2 45, ps 1 26, ps 2 24, ps 3 38, ad 1 22, ad 2 19, ad 3 20, 1 a 29, 1 b 18, 1 c 11, 1 d 11, 2 a 27, 2 b 17, 2 c 10, 3 a 39, 3 b 23, 3 c 15, 4 a 18, 4 b 14, ag 1-4 17–20, g 1 16, g 2 11, g 3-4, g 6 13, g 5 17. Legs ( Figs. 35 View FIGURE 35 , 36 View FIGURE 36 ). Lengths of legs: leg I 145, leg II 97, leg III 100, leg IV 125. Leg I ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 A) Leg setation: Tr 0, Fe 3/5 (d, l’, l”, v’, v”, d 1, l’ 1, bv”), Ge 6(1) (d, l’, l”, v’, v”, l’ 1, σ), Ti 8(1) (d, l’ξ, l”, v’, v”, k, l’ 1, l” 1, φ), Ta 14(2) (p’ξ, p”ξ, tc’ξ, tc”ξ, ft’ξ, ft”ξ, a’, a”, u’, u”, s, pl”, pv’, pv”, ω 1, ω 2). Sensory pits of tarsus oval; ω 1 situated in the space between setae tc”, and (ft); ω 2 situated posteriorly to seta ft’. Leg II ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 B). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 2 (d, bv”), Ge 2(1) (l’, l”, σ), Ti 4(1) (d, l’, v’, v”, φ), Ta 7(1) (p’ξ, p”, tc ’, tc”, u’, u”, ε, ω). Setae tc’ blunt-ended. Empodium very small, about four times shorter than tarsal claws.
Leg III ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 A). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 3 (d, v’, ev’), Ge 2 (l’, v’), Ti 3(1) (d, v’, v”, φ), Ta 5 (tc ’, tc”, p”, u’, u”). Claws and empodium of same shape as on tarsus II. Seta (u) with one distinct barb; setae (tc) and p” bluntended. Leg IV ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 B). Leg setation: Tr 0, Fe 1/2 (d, v’, ev’), Ge 1 (v’), Ti 3 (d, v’, v”), Ta 5 (p’, p”, tc, u’, u”). Setae (u) with one distinct barb each; seta tc blunt-ended.
MALE not available for this study. Described by Delfinado and Baker (1974).
LARVA, PROTONYMPH, DEUTONYMPH and TRITONYMPH unknown.
Material examined. One female, USA, New York, Schuyler Co., Connecticut Hill, rotten stump, 12 September 1975, coll. and det. B.M. OConnor.
Remarks. The original description of Scolotydaeus simplex lacks illustrations of the female and Delfinado and Baker (1974) only stated that the female has a longer genital opening. Here, I show that this species is better placed in Tanytydeus because of the absence of eyes and leg and palpal solenidia forming sensory pits.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Prostigmata |
Family |
|
Genus |