Tenedos valle, Martínez & Brescovit & Martínez, 2023

Martínez, Leonel, Brescovit, Antonio D. & Martínez, Carlos Prieto, 2023, Revealing the diversity of ant-eating spiders in Colombia II: morphology, distribution, and taxonomy of the trilobatus group of the genus Tenedos O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897 (Araneae: Zodariidae), Zootaxa 5328 (1), pp. 1-66 : 51

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5328.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:163EDB50-9804-4B1C-BCD8-28E580E633C8

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/75340562-FFCF-FFF9-FF16-FF6A2AB9A899

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tenedos valle
status

sp. nov.

Tenedos valle sp. n. Martínez & Brescovit

Figs 37–39 View FIGURE 37 View FIGURE 38 View FIGURE 39 ; 46 View FIGURE 46

Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA. Valle del Cauca: La Cumbre, Vereda Chicoral Alto Bitaco, Bitaco , Finca Monte Bello , pristine forest fragment, pitfall trap, 2030 m, [3°33′56″N, 76°34′58″W], I. Quintero & González leg., 2-4.VIII.2003, 1 ♁ (IAvH-I-6128) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: same data as the holotype, 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-6129), 1 ♁ 1 ♀ (IAvH-I- 6130), 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-6132), 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-6133), 1 ♀ (IAvH-I-6131) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition from the department of the type locality of the species.

Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos valle sp. n. resembles those of Tenedos huila sp. n. Tenedos huila sp. n. by having a developed basal tegular membranous projection (BTM); sclerotized process at distal side of the conductor (C) ( Figs 34 View FIGURE 34 , 35A–D View FIGURE 35 ; 36A–B View FIGURE 36 ), but are distinguished by recurved median apophysis (MA) with anterior tip; thinner posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA), and sub-quadrangular anterior branch (aRTA), apically entire ( Figs 38A–D View FIGURE 38 ; 39A–B View FIGURE 39 ). Females are similar those of Tenedos huila sp. n. by shape of lateral borders (LB) and atrium (A), are characterized by wider copulatory ducts (CD), describing less than five tuns on spermathecae ( Figs 38E–F View FIGURE 38 ; 39C–D View FIGURE 39 ).

Description. Male (Holotype, IAvH-I-6128). Coloration ( Fig. 37A–B View FIGURE 37 ): carapace brown-orange, dark brown in margins. Chelicerae with brown paturon, fangs brown-reddish. Endites pale brown, white on anterior region. Labium and sternum light brown, with dark borders. Legs: Coxae I–IV pale yellow. Femora I–IV brown with dark patches on medial region. Patellae I–IV brown. Tibia-tarsi I–IV light brown. Abdomen: dorsally dark gray with twelve white guanine spots organized as follows: two large, slightly elongated spots, followed by two incipient, irregular, very small spots, anteriorly positioned; six transverse spots, which the medial are smaller, medially positioned; two irregular spots smaller than previous ones, medially fused, posteriorly positioned. Laterally dark gray with a white band apically divided. Ventrally beige with gray lateral patches. Spinnerets light brown. Measurements: total length 3.97, carapace length 1.91, width 1.21, height 0.76. Clypeus height 0.36. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.08, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; AME–AME 0.13, AME–ALE 0.16, AME–PME 0.17, PME–PME 0.17, PME–PLE 0.24, ALE–PLE 0.17. Chelicerae 0.66 length. Sternum length 0.72, width 0.71. Legs: I—femur 1.26/ patella 0.40/ tibia 1.13/ metatarsus 1.08/ tarsus 0.74/ total 4.61; II—1.07/ 0.40/ 0.81/ 0.80/ 0.50/ 3.58; III—1.05/ 0.40/ 0.76/ 0.93/ 0.55/ 3.69; IV—1.21/ 0.50/ 1.15/ 1.44/ 0.82/ 5.12. Abdomen length 1.59. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): I—femur p 0, tibia p 0, metatarsus v 1r-0-2, p 0. Palp: retrolateral process of cymbium (RCP) strongly sclerotized at basal side; tegulum (T) apically longer than wide, sub-rounded, elongated towards embolus base with developed basal membrane; subtegulum (St) thin in ventral view; conductor (C) with sclerotized process at distal side, prolateral laminar projection projected; appendix (ApC) very short, pointed; embolus (E) emerging basally on tegulum tending towards prolateral side; embolus base (EB) robust, short; spermatic ducts visible in retrolateral view, thin; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) small, robust, tubular-shaped in ventral view; median apophysis (MA) large, sub-quadrangular; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) with posterior branch (pRTA) longer than palpal tibia, thin ( Figs 38A–D View FIGURE 38 ; 39A–B View FIGURE 39 ).

Female (Paratype, IAvH-I-6129). Coloration and abdominal pattern of spots as male with some modifications: carapace uniformly brown, legs light brown ( Fig. 37C–D View FIGURE 37 ). Measurements: total length 4.29, carapace length 1.84, width 1.24, height 0.91. Clypeus height 0.37. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.07; AME–AME 0.15, AME–ALE 0.19, AME–PME 0.21, PME–PME 0.21, PME–PLE 0.28, ALE–PLE 0.17. Chelicerae 0.66 length. Sternum length 0.77, width 0.81. Legs: I—femur 1.13/ patella 0.46/ tibia 0.96/ metatarsus 0.86/ tarsus 0.65/ total 4.06; II—0.95/ 0.44/ 0.75/ 0.68/ 0.48/ 3.30; III—0.83/ 0.42/ 0.64/ 0.70/ 0.50/ 3.09; IV—1.13/ 0.42/ 0.90/ 1.27/ 0.74/ 4.46. Abdomen length 2.25. Legs spines pattern (only the differences from the general pattern): II—tibia v 1r-1r-1r (1r-1r-2), metatarsus v 1r-0-2; IV—tibia v 2-0-2. Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) short, wide, apically rounded, forming posterior atrium (A) thinner in anterior region; median field plate (MFP) large, with rounded basal edge; copulatory ducts (CD) long, wide, transversely oriented; spermathecae (S) small, sub-rounded, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) almost as long as spermathecae ( Figs 38E–F View FIGURE 38 ; 39C–D View FIGURE 39 ).

Variation. Females (n=5): total length: 4.02–4.36; carapace length: 1.82–1.84; femur I length: 0.75–1.13.

Distribution. Known from Valle del Cauca department ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Zodariidae

Genus

Tenedos

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF