Tiphia (Jaynesia) rotunda Han, Chen & Li, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4970.2.5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4895211 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA87C2-FFE8-FFCF-B182-3FDAFD06FC06 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tiphia (Jaynesia) rotunda Han, Chen & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tiphia (Jaynesia) rotunda Han, Chen & Li , sp. nov.
( Figs 22–30 View FIGURES 22–30 )
Diagnosis. This species can be recognized by the following combination of characters: posterior margin of tegula without transverse impressed line ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–30 ), lateral carina of propodeum obsolete ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–30 ), S1 ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–30 ) without lateral groove on posterior half, and T2 1.7× wider than long and its lateral margin rounded ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ).
Material examined. Holotype, ♂, China, Gansu prov., Zhangye City, Linze County, Xinhua Town , Xiaoquanz- itan Village , 39°2′48″N, 99°9′35″E, 1394 m, 27.VI.2019, Xue Zhang ( CNU). GoogleMaps
Description. Male ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ). Body length 5.27 mm. Forewing length 4.0 mm. Black with erect long whitish setae, with flagellum, tegula, tibiae, tarsi, pterostigma and wing venation brown; mandible reddish brown; coxae and femora dark brown; wings translucent ( Figs 22–23, 25 View FIGURES 22–30 ).
Head. Mandible without distinct medial transverse groove, at most with obsolete intermittent impressed line; W: OW: L: IOD=40: 16: 21: 25; OOD: POD: Od=12: 13: 6; AOD: WAS: IAD: CL: CAW=26: 20: 11: 25: 18; clypeus ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with dense punctures and evenly distributed, ventral margin medially convex and slightly emarginated in middle, lateral margin convex, without thickened; frons ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–30 ) without one medial longitudinal narrow groove or carina; upper frons with sparse punctures; lower frons with denser punctures; vertex ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with sparse and small punctures on lateral side of ocellus, postocellar area relatively smooth, rare punctures, upper anterior-ocellus with sparse and small punctures, with interspaces smooth.
Mesosoma. Pronotal dorsal face with sparse and small punctures, almost evenly spaced ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–30 ); pronotal lateral face ventrally with dense oblique striae; mesoscutum with notaulus and dense punctures; mesopleuron with dense and minute punctures; metanotal trough and metascutellum with sparse and small punctures ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–30 ); lateral carina of propodeum obsolete, and posteriorly with short striae connecting transverse carina; propodeal areola slightly convergent posteriorly, APWL=1.58: 0.9: 1.63, medial longitudinal carina reaching posterior 1/2 of areola; surface of propodeal areola medially flat and smooth ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–30 ); propodeal lateral face anteriorly with long dense oblique wrinkles, posteriorly with dense and minute punctures, without short medial longitudinal carina; tegula ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–30 ) smooth, with erect long whitish setae on its anterior and inner margin, without transverse impressed line; forewing ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with pterostigma, and apex of marginal cell not exceeding the second submarginal cell.
Metasoma. T1 ( Figs 22, 27 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with sparse punctures, subposterior groove with a row of minute punctures; S1 ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–30 ) smooth and impunctate, and without posterolateral groove and medial carina; T2 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ) 1.7× wider than long, and its lateral margin rounded, anteriorly with transverse row of short longitudinal striae; T1–T7 with erect long whitish setae; T2–T6 with sparse punctures ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ); T1–T6 posteriorly with thin lamellae; posterior margin of S2–S5 with sparse recumbent long whitish setae; S5 ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with lateral denticle, nearly longitudinal and slightly curved inwards, without distinct hollow; T7 ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with one medial longitudinal impunctate area.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. China (Gansu).
Remarks. This species is similar to T. (J.) borealis Chen & Yang, 1990 by having the following character states: pronotal lateral face ventrally with dense oblique striae; mesoscutum ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with notaulus and dense punctures; apex of marginal cell of forewing not exceeding the second submarginal cell; T2–T6 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ) with sparse punctures. However, this new species differs from it by having the lateral carina of propodeum obsolete; propodeal areola slightly convergent posteriorly, medial longitudinal carina reaching posterior 1/2 of areola ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22–30 ); S1 smooth and impunctate ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22–30 ); T2 1.7× wider than long, and its lateral margin rounded ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–30 ).
Etymology. The specific name rotunda is derived from a Latin adjective rotundus (= round), referring to the lateral margin of T2 that is rounded in dorsal view.
CNU |
Capital Normal University, College of Life Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Jaynesia |