Triphoris mirifica Deshayes, 1863
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:904D8C6D-A0C0-4D5A-960F-AEBACE141DF0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5837073 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380CB2B-047C-152F-FFB4-4FBAFE5CFC92 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Triphoris mirifica Deshayes, 1863 |
status |
|
Triphoris mirifica Deshayes, 1863
Triphoris mirificus Deshayes, 1863: 104 View in CoL , pl. 21, fig. 32–33.
Triforis mirifica Deshayes, 1863 View in CoL — Martens 1880: 283.
Triforis mirificus Deshayes, 1863 — Tryon 1887: 182, pl. 38, fig. 10.
Trifora mirifica Deshayes, 1863 — Viader 1937: 43.
Triphora mirifica Deshayes, 1863 View in CoL — Jay 2007: 39, fig. 20–22, 52.
Type locality. Reunion.
Neotype type locality. Reunion, Cape La Houssaye , Saint Paul, 10 m deep.
Type material. MNHN-IM-2000-9491, neotype.
Distribution. French Polynesia ( Boutet et al. 2020), Madagascar ( Dautzenberg 1923), Marshall Islands ( Smith 1884), Mauritius ( Viader 1937), New Caledonia ( Héros et al. 2007), Reunion ( Deshayes 1863; Martens 1880; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Jay 2007).
Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris mirifica . Neotype designated by Jay (2007).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Triphoris mirifica Deshayes, 1863
Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G. 2022 |
Triphora mirifica
Jay, M. 2007: 39 |
Trifora mirifica
Viader, R. 1937: 43 |
Triforis mirificus
Tryon, G. W. 1887: 182 |
Triforis mirifica
Martens, E. von 1880: 283 |
Triphoris mirificus
Deshayes, G. P. 1863: 104 |