Tupiniquim confusa Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5068.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4DAB2CFA-B192-434D-A697-8B1067BBFDED |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5702253 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D26D412E-FFFF-8F50-FF14-F16985E7FB4A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tupiniquim confusa Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tupiniquim confusa Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov , new species
( Figs 14–22 View FIGURES 14–16 View FIGURES 17–22 )
Diagnosis. Tupiniquim confusa can easily be differentiated from its congener (in parentheses) by the following features: setiferous pores in a small cluster of three on each side of vertex near eyes (four setiferous pores organized in two longitudinal lines); posterior margin of pronotum without depressions (two small depression on posterior margin of pronotum); pronotal surface finely textured (pronotal surface almost smooth, with fine punctures); elytra with punctures confusedly organized (elytra with punctures barely organized in rows); median lobe of aedeagus at apex bent ventrally in lateral view (median lobe of aedeagus straight).
Description. Body 1.73–2.05 mm long and 1.08–1.13 mm wide. Color entirely yellow or brown; in brown specimens pronotum and head sometimes darker and antennae and legs lighter. Frons and vertex forming about 135º angle, in lateral view. Supraorbital pore almost indistinguishable from two or three other pores closely placed in cluster ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–16 ). Ridge from inner margin of antennal socket to eye not inclined towards insertion of antenna. Pronotum rectangular, width 1.5 times length. Surface of pronotum microreticulate. Elytra punctured, with punctures confused ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–16 ). Median lobe simple, tubular, in ventral view lateral expansion slightly longer and farther from apex, apex with long, wide denticle; in lateral view abruptly curved basally, apex bent ventrally, straightening further apically ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–22 ).
Spermatheca with receptacle having external side nearly straight and internal side strongly convex; pump with longitudinal part much shorter than transverse part ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ). Tignum with posterior sclerotization about half as wide as tignum entire length ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 17–22 ).
Type material. Holotype:male ( DZUP). Brazil: Bahia; W of Camacan , 900m; Serra Bonita N. R.; 16-18.XI.2012; S. & Sv. Kurbatov, legs . / Holotype, Tupiniquim confusa Linzmeier, Oliveira & Konstantinov , sp. nov. 2021 [red label].
Paratypes (3): 2 males, 1 female; USNM: same data label as holotype .
Etymology. The specific epithet is a Latin adjective referring to one of the distinctive characteristics of this species, punctures on elytra confusedly distributed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |