Urophora veruata Rondani, 1870
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4982492 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FEB1-FED7-5889-FB7FFAF96651 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Urophora veruata Rondani, 1870 |
status |
|
Urophora veruata Rondani, 1870 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1870a: 14 (key), 18 (description).
TYPE LOCALITY: “ in Apennino parmensi [ Parmese Apennines ( Italy)]” .
TYPE MATERIAL: 1 ♀, lectotype (missing right wing, abdomen in microvial pinned below specimen) ( MZUF: Box 32): Urophora Desv. / veruata Rnd., Apen. [= Apennines] / 1693 / To be lectotype [not designated] Urophora veruata Rondani , det. I.M. White, 1986; 1 ♀, paralectotype (dirty, damaged by the pin, abdomen in microvial pinned below specimen) ( MZUF: Box 32): Urophora Desv. / veruata Rnd. / 1693 / paralectotype [not designated] Urophora veruata Rondani , det. I.M. White, 1986.
CURRENT STATUS: valid species ( Foote 1984: 145); junior synonym of Urophora solstitialis (Linnaeus, 1758) ( White & Korneyev 1989: 360, Norrbom et al. 1999: 243).
REMARKS: Rondani (1870a: 18) described Urophora veruata from just the female sex without specifying either the number or the length of the specimens: “ Bis foeminam … legi [I collected the female twice]”. White & Korneyev (1989: 359) reported two females in the MZUF. Ian M. White examined the MZUF type material in 1986, adding the label “ lectotype ” and “ paralectotype ” under the specimens, but without, as far we know, formally publishing a lectotype designation. In order to promote nomenclatural stability, we give credit to I.M. White and here designate as a lectotype for Urophora veruata Rondani, 1870 the female labeled as such by him.
MZUF |
Museo Zoologico La Specola, Universita di Firenze |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |