Zamia incognita A.Lindstr. & Idárraga, 2009

Lindström, Anders J. & Idárraga, Álvaro, 2009, Zamia incognita (Zamiaceae): the exciting discovery of a new gymnosperm from Colombia, Phytotaxa 2, pp. 29-34 : 30-33

Zamia incognita A.Lindstr. & Idárraga , sp. nov. ( Figs. 1–2 ).

Ad Zamiae cupatiensiae similis. Pinnae latis, obovatis, lucidis, foliae longioris, megastrobilae brevioris, obovatis per pedunculae ignotis differt.

Type:— COLOMBIA: Antioquia: elev. 478 m, 28 January 2008, A ., Idárraga , J. A . Lindström & M. C . López-Gallego 3460 (holotype: HUA; isotype JAUM) .

Similar to Zamia cupatiensis Ducke (1922: 20) , but distinguished by the broad, obovate, glossy leaflets, longer leaves and short, distinctly obovate megastrobilus with indistinct peduncle.

Stem tuberous, hypogeous to epigeous, 22 cm long, irregularly shaped, 15 cm at widest, 15–19 cm in circumference, not uncommon with dichotomously branching apex; cataphylls 2.5–6 cm long, soft, narrowly triangular, stipulate, shedding tomentum. Leaves 2–3 (rarely 4), 93–153 cm tall, erect to arcuate, basally keeled, apically flat, emerging green or pink; petiole (29.5–)33–86 (rarely 92–116) cm long, with few to numerous prickles on the lower part; rachis 11–42 (rarely to 123–152) cm, few prickles to unarmed; pinnae 13–32 per leaf, opposite basally and apically, alternate medially, obovate to lanceolate, coriaceous, glossy green, (22–) 30–40 × (4.1)– 4.7–7 cm, serrate in distal 25–75%, margin revolute, 4–7 mm wide (rarely larger) at point of attachment, spaced 4–9 cm apart, apex acuminate (sometimes emarginate). Macrostrobilus 7.5 × 2.7 cm; sporophylls 20 × 11–12 mm, in 15 rows and 8 columns; bullae 4–5 mm wide, 3–4 mm tall, 4–6 sporangia on each side of abaxial surface, distinctly separated; apex 3–10 mm tall; peduncle 3–6 cm long. Megastrobilus solitary or paired, barrel shaped, often appearing sessile, 7–11 cm tall, 7 cm wide, distinctly brown tomentose; sporophylls 20–30 mm long, 35–45 mm wide, in 6–7 rows; bullae flat, hexagonal, with large terminal facet 16 mm wide, 10 mm tall; apex 2.5–3.7 cm tall, blunt to mucronate (seems to vary with maturity of strobili); peduncle 3.5–7.6 cm long, brown tomentose; seeds 20 mm long, 15–19 mm in diameter, globose; immature sarcotesta cream to light pink-coloured (mature seeds not seen).

Phenology: —Mature plants have been collected with newly emergent cones in November and January.

Habitat: —Well-drained hills often near ridges surrounded by moist tropical forest, in shaded, rather open understory. Average canopy at 20 m with emergents up to 25 m. ELEVATION ranging from 200– 500 m. Associated flora includes Astrocaryum malybo , Bactris pilosa, Oeonocarpus bataua ( Arecaceae ), Cochlospermum orinocense (Bixaceae) , Aegiphila laeta (Lamiaceae) , Gustavia hexapetala , G. nana (Lecythidaceae) , Clathrotropis brunnea, Ormosia sp., Schizolobium parahyba, Swartzia oraria, (Leguminosae) , Bunchosia pseudonitida (Malpighiaceae) , Brosimum guianense , Helianthostylis sprucei , Naucleopsis glabra (Moraceae) , Virola sebifera (Myristicaceae) , Heisteria acuminata (Olacaceae) , Pouteria sp. (Sapotaceae) . The soil consists of 46% sand, 15% lime, 39% clay, 1.9% organic matter with the following micronutrients: P = 2.5 ppm, Al = 6.05 mg /100 gr, Ca = 7.1 mg /100 gr, Mg = 4.8 mg /100gr, K = 0.235 mg /100 gr. The pH was found to be acidic. Some populations exist in soil overlaying limestone outcrops.

Distribution: —Widespread along the valley of the Río Magdalena in Colombia.

Etymology: —From the Latin incognitus, meaning ‘unknown’, which was chosen because this species remained unknown until now.

Additional material studied (paratypes): — COLOMBIA: Santander: Haught 1447 ( BM) , 1578, 2101 ( COL, F, GH, P, US). Upper Magdalena Valley , von Eggers 14034 ( K) ; Antioquia: 200 m, Cogollo & Bernal 11669 ( JAUM) ; Cogollo et al. 1, 2, 3, 4 ( JAUM) ; 245 m, Cardona et al. 1081 ( HUA, MO) ; 200 m, Pérez- Zabala & Idárraga 900 ( MEDEL) ; Idárraga, Lindström & Lopez-Gallego 3454, 3455 ( HUA) ; 478 m, Idárraga, Lindström & López-Gallego 3461, 3462 ( HUA) ; 200 m, Idárraga et al. 1076 ( HUA) ; 470 m, Tuberquia et al. 2676 ( HUA) ; 500 m, Roldan et al. 2924 ( HUA) ; 340–380 m, Callejas et al. 5250 ( HUA, NY) .

Conservation status: —Several populations are known, both historically and still extant. Most populations are not included in any protected areas and are usually on private land. Deforestation and habitat alteration is the main threat. Plants often grow in dense populations, although several populations have been severely disturbed and have consequently been reduced to scattered individuals ( López-Gallego & Idárraga, 2001). The species should be classified as ‘vulnerable’ according to the most recent IUCN Red List categories and criteria ( IUCN, 2001). The complete proposed Red List assessment is VU A1c,b(i,iv)+2a,b,(i,ii,iii,iv).

Observations: —Herbarium vouchers, some even with fertile material, have been collected as early as 1889, but it seems that nobody realised the distinctness of the species. Various Zamia taxa have been recently described, but the taxonomical and genetical relationships between them are practically unknown. We found several specimens not assignable to any known species. Stevenson (2001) placed many of these in already described species, such as Z. poeppigiana Mart. & Eichler in Eichler (1863: 414), Z. melanorrhachis Stevenson (2001: 55) and Z. muricata Willdenow (1806: 847) . Zamia incognita is a species with a subterranean stem that matures at a small size. It does not appear to be related to Z. poeppigiana , which, as currently circumscribed ( Lindström, 2009), does not grow within the political borders of Colombia. The distance from the most northerly known population of the species in Peru (San Martín, Tarapoto), is too long and Z. poeppigiana is most likely endemic to that country. Even at the seedling stage these species can be easily told apart, as Z. poeppigiana always has narrow, lanceolate pinnae, while Z. incognita always has broad, obovate pinnae. As for Z. melanorrhachis , this species seems to be restricted to northern Colombia, as previously considered specimens from central and southern Colombia have been re-identified and are now considered to belong to other species. Finally, Z. muricata is known only from the extreme northeast of Colombia but is more widespread in northern Venezuela, where the type was collected.

Zamia cupatiensis has previously (Stevenson, 2001) been considered a synonym of Z. ulei ( Dammer, 1907: 117) , but study of recently collected material shows that the strobili of both sexes are very distinct. Zamia cupatiensis share the subterranean stem habit and the glossy pinnae, it differs however in the distinctly pedunculate female strobili and the distinctly flattened and broad lamina of the microsporangia.

For this study on Zamia , we have studied the morphological variation within each species analysing as many specimens as possible to be able to present a better understanding of the species in question. By introducing modern molecular techniques, the relationships and groupings of species within the genus Zamia will undoubtedly carry us into the next level of understanding in the evolution of this interesting group of gymnosperms.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Illustration of Zamia incognita (drawn from Idárraga et al. 3460 by Stig Dalström). A. mature pinnae. B. macrostrobilus C. microstrobili.

FIGURE 2. Mature leaf (Idárraga et al. 3460) illustrating typical pinna shape and spacing.