Cymbella tumidula var. procera (Krammer) W.Silva, 2015

Silva, Weliton Jose da, Jahn, Regine, Ludwig, Thelma Alvim Veiga, Hinz, Friedel & Menezes, Mariangela, 2015, Typification and taxonomic status re-evaluation of 15 taxon names within the species complex Cymbella affinis / tumidula / turgidula (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyta), PhytoKeys 53, pp. 1-25 : 6-8

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.53.4782

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/782196BC-7313-5A03-B8F2-3E57309AA7EC

treatment provided by

PhytoKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Cymbella tumidula var. procera (Krammer) W.Silva
status

comb. nov.

Cymbella tumidula var. procera (Krammer) W.Silva comb. nov. Figs 57-63 View Figures 43–63

Basionym.

Cymbella affinis var. procera Krammer, Diatoms Europe 3: 161, Figs 22: 8-13, 2002.

Holotype.

Preparation 714 IOK, in the Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung (BRM), Bremerhaven, Germany.

Lectotype

(designated here). An individual on preparation 714 IOK, in the Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung (BRM), Bremerhaven, Germany, represented by Fig. 57 View Figures 43–63 .

Type locality.

Serbia, Rogatica (abundant in chalk-rich spring), 1976.

Valves lanceolate, dorsiventral, dorsal and ventral margins convex; ends subrostrate or subcapitate; length 27.0-40.3 µm, breadth 9.0-10.2 µm, L/B ratio 2.9-4.2; axial area linear-lanceolate, slightly arched, central area rounded; striae 9-13 in 10 µm, becoming 13-18 toward ends, 2-5 isolated pores; 25-31 punctae in 10 µm.

Remarks.

According to Krammer (2002), this variety differs concerning wider valves (higher than 9.5 µm) from the nominate variety of Cymbella affinis sensu Krammer. We recorded specimens of Cymbella tumidula var. procera with 9 µm breadth, which were higher than the nominate variety (9.0-10.2 vs. 7.8-8.7 µm).

Specimen designated by Krammer (2002), i.e., the preparation 714 IOK (BRM), were found to belong to more than one taxon. Therefore we designated a lectotype as established in Art. 9.11 of the ICN ( McNeill et al. 2012).