Taxonomic revision of the Australian Notoxinae (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) Author Kejval, Zbyněk Muzeum Chodska, Chodské náměstí 96, Domažlice CZ- 344 01, Czech Republic anthicid@seznam.cz text Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 2013 suppl. 2013-11-15 53 1 98 journal article 9540 10.5281/zenodo.4272709 e0acc5ae-bfff-4f31-bf35-3580e085955a ISSN0374-1036 4272709 37E0BCFC-F84A-4B2E-B554-0DC4AE42AD15 Mecynotarsus kingii MacLeay, 1872 ( Figs 67, 68 , 121 , 132 , 154 , 177 , 198 ) Mecynotarsus kingii MacLeay, 1872: 305 . Mecynotarsus kingii : PIC (1911) : 14 (catalogue); LEA (1922) : 472 (catalogue). Type locality. Australia , Queensland , Gayndah. Type material. LECTOTYPE [here designated; Fig.121 ]: , ‘[orange round label] // K35019 [h] // Mecynotarsus Kingi Macl. W. Gayndah [h] // HOLOTYPE [p; red label] // K 269832 [p]’ ( AMSA ). PARALECTOTYPES : 1 ♀ , same data as lectotype [mounted on same card] ( AMSA ); 1 ♀ ( Fig. 198 ), ‘Gayndah [p] // Mecynotarsus Kingi Mcl [h] // Co-type [p] // 19041 Mecynotarsus Kingi Macl Queensland Cotype [h] // SAMA Database No. 25-028562 [p]’ ( SAMA ); 1 spec. [fragments], ‘Gayndah [p] // SYNTYPE [p; red-orange label] // On permanent loan from MACLEAY MUSEUM University of Sydney [p] // Mecynotarsus Kingii Macl. Gayndah [h] // AUST. NAT. INS. COLL. [p; green label] // ANIC Database No. 25 054225 [p]’ ( ANIC ); 3 ♂♂ [mounted on single card], the same data, except: ‘ Mecynotarsus Kingi’ and ‘ANIC Database No. 25 054226’ ( ANIC ). Additional material. AUSTRALIA : AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: 1 ♂, Ginninderra , at light, 19.ii.1975 , K. R. Pullen ( ANIC ) ; 1♀ , Uriarra Crossing , 30.xii.1985 , K.R. Pullen ( ANIC ) . SOUTH AUSTRALIA : 4♂♂ 1♀ , Murray River , A. H. Elston leg. ( AMSA ) ; 6 ♂♂ 1 ♀ , Adelaide , at beach, xii.1958 , C. Watts leg. ( SAMA ) . NEW SOUTH WALES : 1 ♂ 5 ♀♀ , Bungonia State Park , Shoalhaven River Gorge , 5.–7.x.1985 , C. Reid leg. ( ANIC , 1 spec. ZKDC ) ; 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀ , Moree , 29.xii.1971 , B. Cantrell leg. ( QMBA ) . QUEENSLAND : 1 ♀ , Canungra ca. 75 km S of Brisbane , UV light near creek, 175 m , 9.–10.i.1991 , Pollock & Reichert leg. ( DCDC ) ; 3 ♀♀ , Carnarvon National Park , Sekt. Salvator Rosa , i.97, Wachtel leg. ( ZSMC ) ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀ , Carnarvon National Park , S of Lake Nuga Nuga , i.1997 , Wachtel leg. ( ZSMC , ZKDC ) . Redescription ( paralectotype , female, SAMA). Body length 2.8 mm . Body largely reddish brown, pronotal disc distinctly darker, nearly brown black, elytra with rather vague markings, darker medially, especially in basal third, paler reddish apically and laterally. Antero-lateral margins of frons distinctly raised to somewhat lobed near insertion of antennae ( Fig. 132 ). Gular rugules of different sizes, anteriorly larger, nearly contiguous and ordered similarly as in Fig. 138 . Clypeal granules rather distinct. Setation of head largely short, fine and appressed on vertex, with numerous distinctly longer, mostly raised setae in median line, somewhat coarser, subdecumbent laterally along eyes. Antennae moderately long; antennomeres III–V about twice, X 1.2 times as long as wide; setation mostly fine, distinctly coarser to scaly on three basal antennomeres, with several long, stiff setae on antennomere I. Pronotum globose, its lateral margins rather strongly, evenly convex in dorsal view; posterior collar narrow but distinct. Pronotal horn robust and wide, subtriangular, its posterior angles distinct in dorsal view ( Fig. 154 ); horn margins armed with 4 and 5 lobules on lateral sides, apical lobule simple; horn crest distinct, wide, with coarse rugules on margins; distinct submarginal rugules somewhat unevenly spaced; numerous median rugules of different sizes. Setation whitish, largely scaly and appressed, inconspicuous on pronotal horn dorsally; scales on pronotal disc of different sizes, widely rounded to truncate apically; antebasal paired setae present laterally and absent medially, numerous additional tactile setae present antero-laterally. Elytra 1.7 times as long as wide; omoplates and postbasal impression absent. Setation scaly, appressed, evenly developed, whitish and brownish, forming rather distinct markings ( Fig. 198 ); scales shortly oval, subtruncate apically, opaque, densely spaced but distinct ( Fig. 177 ); erect tactile setae absent. Figs 67–73. 67–68 – Mecynotarsus kingii MacLeay, 1872: 67 – tergum VIII, 68 – aedeagus in dorsal view. 69–71 – M. kreusleri King, 1869: 69 – sternum VII, 70 – tergum VIII, 71 – aedeagus in dorsal view. 72–73 – M. leai Pic, 1942: 72 – tergum VIII, 73 – aedeagus in dorsal view. Scale (0.5 mm): A – Figs 70–73; B – Fig. 69; C – Fig. 67; D – Fig. 68. Male characters ( paralectotype , ANIC). Sternum VII moderately produced and slightly emarginate apically. Tergum VIII and aedeagus as in Figs 67, 68 ; parameres rather strongly curved in apical third. Variation. Body length (♂ ) 2.8–3.4 mm . Pronotal horn usually with four lobules on each side; median rugules sometimes fused and forming coarse sculpture. Dark markings of elytra vaguely indicated to rather distinct. Differential diagnosis. Mecynotarsus kingii resembles especially M. pilbarensis sp. nov. by the similar body shape, morphology of the pronotal horn, setation, and the male characters. It can be distinguished by the somewhat prolonged frontal portion of the head, the anterolateral margins of the frons subparallel, distinctly raised to somewhat lobed near insertion of antennae ( Fig. 132 ), and by the apically strongly narrowed and more curved parameres (cf. Figs 68 versus 103). Distribution. Australia : Australian Capital Territory (new record), New South Wales (new record), Queensland ( MACLEAY 1872 ), South Australia (new record). Remarks. MACLEAY (1872) described M. kingii from an unstated number of specimens collected near Gayndah in Queensland . The seven type specimens must be regarded as syntypes , and together represent three different species. At least some of the printed type labels were subsequently added by curators. They are stored in three institutions (AMSA, ANIC and SAMA): AMSA – two females of two clearly different species, one designated as lectotype , the other is very close or even conspecific with M. granulatus sp. nov. ; SAMA – a female in very good condition ( Fig. 198 ), conspecific with the lectotype ; ANIC – a strongly damaged torso and three males in good condition, mounted on the same label and belonging to two very close species (one of them conspecific with the lectotype , and used herein for description of male characters of M. kingii , the other two probably specimens of M. pilicornis sp. nov. ).