Morphology and systematics of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae), a rare associate of the palm weevil, Rhynchophorus palmarum in Trinidad Author Giblin-Davis, Robin M. Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida-IFAS, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 - 7719, USA. E-mail: giblin @ ufl. edu Author Kanzaki, Natsumi Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida-IFAS, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 - 7719, USA. E-mail: giblin @ ufl. edu & Present address: Forest Pathology Laboratory, Forestry and Forest Product Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305 - 8687, Japan. E-mail: nkanzaki @ affrc. go. jp Author Ye, Weimin Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida-IFAS, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 - 7719, USA. E-mail: giblin @ ufl. edu & Present address: Nematode Assay Section, Agronomic Division, North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 1040 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1040. E-mail: weimin. ye @ ncmail. net & Hubbard Center for Genome Studies, University of New Hampshire, 35 Colovos Rd., Durham, NH, 03824, USA. E-mail: kelley. thomas @ unh. edu Author Center, Barbara J. Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida-IFAS, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 - 7719, USA. E-mail: giblin @ ufl. edu Author Thomas, W. Kelley Hubbard Center for Genome Studies, University of New Hampshire, 35 Colovos Rd., Durham, NH, 03824, USA. E-mail: kelley. thomas @ unh. edu text Zootaxa 2006 2006-05-01 1189 1 39 53 https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1189.1.2 journal article 10.11646/zootaxa.1189.1.2 1175­5334 5064294 D45D11D5-67A4-4D8A-820A-DF96D8555DD3 Description of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. ( Figs. 1–4 ) Measurements were made of male and female specimens in temporary water mounts ( Table 1 ). Morphological description Males: Body cylindrical, tapered at both ends, J­shaped when heat killed ( Fig. 1B ). The anterior regions (exterior and interior) of adult males and females were the same and are only described in detail for the male. Cuticle with fine annulation, annules about 0.7­0.8 m wide at midbody ( Figs. 1C , 3A ). Lateral field with three incisures ( Fig. 1C , 3A ), beginning just above level of metacorpus, extending posteriorly to level of ventral preanal papilla; less distinct from ventral preanal papilla to beginning of bursal flap (= caudal alae) at level of subventral pair of postanal papillae (P3). Head distinctly offset from body, lip region in lateral view less than 2.5 times wider than tall ( Figs. 1C , 2A ). En face pattern (SEM) consisting of a clearly defined circular oral aperture (about 0.03 m ) surrounded by a dorsoventrally elongated labial disc, with a long indentation on each lateral side, and a small slit on each subdorsal and subventral side ( Fig. 2B–C ). These slits and indentations may represent the inner labial sensillae. Labial disc surrounded by circular plate comprised of fused lateral, subventral and subdorsal lip sectors, about 1.6­1.7 m in diameter ( Fig. 2 ). Labial sensillae obscured; a composite of several SEM en face patterns suggests two lateral outer labial sensillae open mediolaterally onto circular lip sector plate ( Fig. 2 ). Circular lip sector plate surrounded by hexaradiate cephalic sectors, two subdorsal, two lateral, and two subventral ( Fig. 2 ). Pore­like amphidial apertures, dorso­medially located on lateral cephalic sectors and a slightly elevated cephalic papilla clearly resolved on each subdorsal and subventral cephalic sector ( Fig. 2 ). Six to eight transverse striae visible on head with SEM ( Fig. 2 ). Stylet two part; cone short, about 2/5 total stylet length, shaft with slight basal thickenings ( Fig. 1C ). Procorpus cylindrical, about two and one half stylet lengths long ending in well­developed metacorpus ( Fig. 1A–C ). Dorsal esophageal gland orifice opens into lumen of metacorpus less than one metacorpal valve length above metacorpal valve ( Fig. 1C ). Esophagointestinal junction less than one metacorpal valve width behind metacorpus. Postcorpus glandular, overlaps intestine dorsally about 3 metacorpal lengths long ( Fig. 1C ). Excretory pore posterior to nerve ring, hemizonid about one stylet length behind excretory pore ( Fig. 1C ). Gonad reflexed, sperm amoeboid ( Fig. 1B ). Tail arcuate, about 2.6 anal body widths long; terminus claw­like from lateral view ( Figs. 1B,H ). Spicules separate, ventrally arcuate with gradual lamina taper from calomus to tip, rostrum sharply­pointed to conical, condylus elongate and truncate with slight posterior recurvature, distal ventral end with small cucullus and in SEM with apparent lateral projection ( Fig. 3A–B ), spicule length measured along its arc/capitulum width (distance between condylus and rostrum) ratio is about 2.1; spicule length measured along its arc/spicule width posterior to rostrum is about 2.4; junction of rostrum and calomus smoothly curved; lamina complex with midpoint widened and rounded; lamina dorsal contour often smoothly and symmetrically curved ( Figs. 1H, J–O ); ratio of depth of capitulum depression divided by the capitulum width about 0.15. Spicules are recurved so that a line drawn through the anterior­most points of the condylus and rostrum (along the capitulum) and extending the posterior dorsal lamina intersects ventrally at less than a 14º angle ( Figs. 1J–O , 4C ). Seven preanal and postanal papillae present; one preanal papilla (P1) in ventral midline about 2 m above cloaca ( Figs. 1G–H , 3A–B ), one pair subventral preanal papillae (P2) in line with P1 papilla ( Figs. 1G–H , 3A–B ), one subventral pair of postanal papillae (P3) at about 55% of a tail length behind cloaca ( Figs. 1G–H , 3A ), one small ventral pair of papillae (P4) about 22–24 m from tail terminus ( Figs. 1G–H , 3A,C ). Occasional asymmetry was observed in P3 and P4 papillae arrangement ( Fig. 3A,C ). Bursa rounded in ventral view and pointed in lateral view ( Figs. 1G–H , 3A,C ). TABLE 1. Morphometrics of male and female specimens each of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. in temporary water mounts (measurements in m).
Measurement or ratio Water mounts (males) Water mounts (females)
n 15 15
Length (mean + S.D.; range) 603.2 + 43.7 (520–669) 758.1 + 43.0 (680–817)
Body width (at vulva for females) (males = GBW; females = VBW) 18.5 + 1.7 (16–22) 22.2 + 1.6 (20–25)
Stylet length 13.1 + 0.4 (12–14) 14.1 + 0.6 (13–15)
Esophagus length (to end of metacorpus) 61.1 + 3.4 (55–68) 64.5 + 4.9 (56–71)
Postuterine sac length ­ 66.1 + 18.0 (45–97)
Vulva to anus distance (VA) ­ 130.8 + 14.7 (103–146)
Spicule length 12.7 + 0.9 (10–14) ­
Anal body width (ABW) 14.0 + 0.9 (13–16) 9.2 + 0.6 (8–10)
Tail length 35.8 + 2.2 (32–39) 44.0 + 3.2 (40–50)
a 32.9 + 4.0 (28–43) 34.3 + 2.5 (30–40)
b 9.9 + 0.7 (8–11) 11.8 + 0.7 (11–13)
c 16.9 + 1.3 (15–20) 17.1 + 1.3 (15–19)
c’ 2.6 + 0.2 (2.3–2.9) 4.8 + 0.3 (4–6)
V (%) ­ 77 + 1.3 (75–79)
FIGURE 1. Adult females and males of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. in lateral view (except where noted). A) Whole female. B) Whole male. C) Anterior body of female. D) Vulva, vagina, postuterine sac of female reproductive system. E,F) Female tail variability G) Male tail (ventral view). H) Male tail. I) Spicules (ventral view). J–L) Different focal planes through spicules of single male. M–O) Different focal planes through spicules of different male specimen. J–O) Lines drawn through the anterior­most points along the capitulum and extending the posterior dorsal lamina for each spicule are shown. FIGURE 2. Scanning electron micrographs of adult females of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. A) Head, lateral view. B) Almost en face view of same female. C) Almost en face view of different female. Females: Body ventrally arcuate or straight when killed by heat treatment ( Fig. 1A ). Lateral field with three incisures; decreases to two incisures posterior to level of anus; extending almost to tail terminus. Ovary single, anteriorly outstretched, oocytes in single file except at anterior half of ovary ( Fig. 1A ). Vulva dome­shaped slit in ventral view which gives the appearance of a small vulval flap in lateral view, but is not a true vulval flap ( Fig. 1D ). Vagina straight with anteriorly projected incline in lateral view, paired and three­celled structures at back of uterus facing vagina ( Fig. 1 D ). Postuterine sac about 3 vulva body diameters long, about 54% of vulval­anus distance, sometimes filled with sperm ( Fig. 1A,D ). Anus dome­shaped slit in ventral view. Tail strongly recurved ventrally, about 4.8 times longer than anal body width, and finely rounded to digitate ( Figs. 1A, E–F , 4B ). FIGURE 3. Scanning electron micrographs of adult male tail region of Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. A) Almost ventral view of tail with protracted spicules with lateral projections and cucullae, asymmetric presentation of paired P3 papillae and P4 “glandpapillae”, rounded bursal flap, and lateral incisures, arrows = P4 papillae. B) Almost ventral view of different mail tail with protracted spicules with lateral projections and cucullae and single preanal P1 and preanal pair of P2 papillae. C) Ventral view of different male tail tip showing rounded bursal flap and symmetrical pairs of P3 papillae and P4 “glandpapillae” (= arrows). Diagnosis Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. is distinguished from other described species of Bursaphelenchus by significant molecular sequence differences in the near­full length small subunit (SSU) rDNA (GenBank accession number = AY508024 ), D2D3 expansion segments of the large subunit (LSU) rDNA ( AY508092 ) and partial mitochondrial DNA COI ( AY508055 ) ( Giblin­Davis et al . 2005 ; Ye et al . 2006 ). In addition, B. gerberae n. sp. can be differentiated from those Bursaphelenchus that are closest to it morphologically and molecularly by a combination of character differences in stylet, rostrum, condylus, and lamina shape of male spicules, and c’ and post­uterine sac length in females. FIGURE 4. Photomicrographs of adults of Bursaphelenchus in lateral view. A–C) Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. A) Anterior region of female. B) Female tail. C) Male tail with spicules. D) Bursaphelenchus hofmanni male tail with spicules. E) Bursaphelenchus paracorneolus male tail with spicules. F) Bursaphelenchus hylobianum male tail with spicules. Relationships Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. is closest to Bursaphelenchus hylobianum Korentchenko 1980 , B. paracorneolus Braasch 2000 and B. hofmanni Braasch 1998 based upon a tree inferred from near full length SSU sequences from 37 isolates of 20 species ( Giblin­Davis et al . 2005 ; Ye et al . 2006 ). These species and B. corneolus Massey 1966 , which has not been sequenced, share the morphological characters of three lateral incisures (except B. hylobianum with two and B. corneolus with an unknown number), male caudal papillae arrangement (single preanal P1 papilla, pair of pre­/adanal P2 papillae, pair of postanal P3 papillae, and one pair of small P4 papillae at base of bursa), separate mitten­shaped spicules with cucullae, female vulva a dome­shaped slit in ventral view which gives the appearance of a small vulval flap in lateral view, but is not a true vulval flap, and female tail strongly ventrally recurved. In addition to significant molecular sequence differences ( Giblin­Davis et al . 2005 ; Ye et al . 2006 ), Bursaphelenchus gerberae n. sp. , which possesses a stylet with small basal swellings, rounded bursa in ventral view, a pointed rostrum and an elongate and truncate condylus with slight posterior recurvature, spicules recurved so that lines drawn through the anterior­most points along the capitulum and extending the posterior dorsal lamina intersects ventrally at about a 14º angle ( Figs. 1J–O , 4C ), postuterine sac about 3 vulva body diameters long (54% of vulval­anus distance), and a female tail c’ of 4.8 (4.4–5.6), can be differentiated from B. paracorneolus because it possesses a bursa with a truncate posterior edge in ventral view, condylus rounded with no posterior recurvature ( Fig. 4E ), and a female tail c’ of less than 3.8. Bursaphelenchus hofmanni can be differentiated from B. gerberae n. sp. because of the following characteristics; a digitate rostrum and rounded condylus with no posterior recurvature, spicules recurved so that lines drawn through the anterior­most points along the capitulum and extending the posterior dorsal lamina intersects dorsally at 10–29º ( Fig. 4D ), and a female tail c’ of less than 3.4. Bursaphelenchus hylobianum can be separated from B. gerberae n. sp. because both sexes have two lateral incisures and males possess spicules with a blunt and rounded rostrum and the cucullus shape gives spicule tips a characteristic broadly truncate appearance in lateral view ( Fig. 4F ). Lastly, B. corneolus differs from B. gerberae n. sp. because it lacks basal stylet swellings in both sexes and the postuterine sac is about 4.4 vulva body diameters long or about 67% of vulval­anus distance in females. Biological characteristics The life history of B. gerberae n. sp. is different from all other known species of Bursaphelenchus in that it is the only known mycophagous species that is associated with the palm weevil, Rhynchophorus palmarum (Gerber & Giblin­Davis 1990A). Bursaphelenchus cocophilus , the other Bursaphelenchus species known to be associated with R. palmarum , is an obligate plant parasite. Although coconut is the plant host, it was a dying tree, which may or may not be important relative to the natural history of this nematode. Type host and locality Holotype male and allotype female and paratypes are from a 28­day­old culture on M. fructicola . The original culture was started with dauer juveniles of B. gerberae n. sp. isolated during a dissection of R. palmarum from a red ring diseased coconut palm from Manzanilla, Trinidad ( 10.49805º N ; 61.04824º W ) in 1988. Type designations Holotype male and allotype female and additional material deposited at the University of California­Riverside Nematode Collection . Paratypes (males and females same data as holotype) deposited at the University of California , Davis ; USDA Nematode Collection , Beltsville , Maryland ; and the Nematology Department , Rothamsted Experiment Station , Harpenden Herts., England . Etymology This species name is derived from the family name of Dr. Karin Gerber, in her honor, for her discovery of this nematode during her postdoctoral research in Trinidad with the first author. Laboratory culture Monilinia fructicola was a suitable host for B. gerberae n. sp. The mean yields per plate after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post inoculation were 63,000 + 26,576, 601,800 + 14,425, 269,200 + 49,215, and 351,900 + 46,188, respectively. This suggests similar population dynamics to what has been reported for other species of Bursaphelenchus on M. fructicola ( Giblin & Kaya 1984 ) .