A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida) Author Williams, Bronwyn W. Author Weaver, Patricia G. text Zootaxa 2018 2018-07-20 4448 1 1 129 journal article 29329 10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1 643c9c14-2378-435b-94cc-ce7640f7d683 1175-5326 1444492 892C99C4-92DA-4FF9-B873-54C78CC6A9FC Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1946 1946 Sphaeromicola stammeri Klie var. hamiger n. var. —Remy: 7–9, Figs. 1 –9 (D, H, R, T). 1948a S. hamigera Remy. —Remy: 129 [also as S . hamiger ], 132, Fig. 9 (R, T). 1948b Sphaeromicola Stammeri var. hamigera Remy. —Remy: 2, 3, suffix of species name altered without discussion (D, H). 1948c Sphaeromicola hamigera .—Remy: 44, 45, Figs. 4, 1–4, 9 (D, H, U). 1951 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy. —Remy: 224, 225, 228 (D, H). 1962 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy. —Hart: 140 (C, D, T). 1964 Sph . hamigera . —Vandel: 303 (C). 1967 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy. —Illies: 171 (D). 1971 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1946 :7 .—Hobbs Jr.: 45, 53, 54 (D, K). 1974 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1946 .—Hart & Hart: 163, 165–166, 220, 238, Pl. XLIV, Fig. 1 , Pl. LXII (D, H, K, T). 1977b Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy. —Danielopol: 24, 36, Fig. 2 (D, R). 1985 Sph. hamigera Remy. —Danielopol & Hart: 56, 57, 59, 60, 67, Figs. 2, 7 [in part, by implication] (C, D, H). 1989 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1948 .—Meisch, Wouters & Martens: 46, erroneous authority year (C, D, H). 1994 S. hamigera .—Danielopol et al .: 121 (D). 2000 Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1946 .—Meisch: 465, 467, 468, 469 Fig. 191 D–J (C, D, H, K, R, T). 2014a Sphaeromicola hamigera Remy, 1946 .—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 951 (C). Remarks: Sphaeromicola hamiger was elevated to species by Remy (1948a: 129) , but with the original suffix for species name. Paris (1920b: 485) seemed somewhat unsure of his record of S . topsenti on Caecosphaeroma virei from the cave of Baume-les-Messieurs in the Jura Mountains of France , and suggested that additional material was needed to confirm identification; this record was based on examination of a single adult male. Remy (1951: 224–225) noted that S . hamigera was the only species he had recovered from both the host species, C . virei , and the cave Baume-les-Messieurs. As such, Remy believed that Paris’ Jura Mountains record of S . topsenti was almost undoubtedly S . hamigera . This putative corrected identification was recalled in Meisch (2000: 468) . Hart & Hart (1974: 165) erroneously list the figure for this species as appearing on Plate XLIII as Fig. 15, when in fact it is Fig. 1 on the Plate XLIV, on the following page.