A historical review of the taxonomy and classification of Entocytheridae (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Podocopida)
Author
Williams, Bronwyn W.
Author
Weaver, Patricia G.
text
Zootaxa
2018
2018-07-20
4448
1
1
129
journal article
29329
10.11646/zootaxa.4448.1.1
643c9c14-2378-435b-94cc-ce7640f7d683
1175-5326
1444492
892C99C4-92DA-4FF9-B873-54C78CC6A9FC
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1946
1946
Sphaeromicola stammeri
Klie var.
hamiger
n. var.
—Remy: 7–9,
Figs. 1
–9 (D, H, R, T).
1948a
S. hamigera
Remy.
—Remy: 129 [also as
S
.
hamiger
], 132, Fig. 9 (R, T).
1948b
Sphaeromicola Stammeri
var.
hamigera
Remy.
—Remy: 2, 3, suffix of species name altered without discussion (D, H).
1948c
Sphaeromicola hamigera
.—Remy: 44, 45, Figs. 4, 1–4, 9 (D, H, U).
1951
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy.
—Remy: 224, 225, 228 (D, H).
1962
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy.
—Hart: 140 (C, D, T).
1964
Sph
.
hamigera
.
—Vandel: 303 (C).
1967
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy.
—Illies: 171 (D).
1971
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1946
:7
.—Hobbs Jr.: 45, 53, 54 (D, K).
1974
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1946
.—Hart & Hart: 163, 165–166, 220, 238, Pl. XLIV,
Fig. 1
, Pl. LXII (D, H, K, T).
1977b
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy.
—Danielopol: 24, 36, Fig. 2 (D, R).
1985
Sph.
hamigera
Remy.
—Danielopol & Hart: 56, 57, 59, 60, 67, Figs. 2, 7 [in part, by implication] (C, D, H).
1989
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1948
.—Meisch, Wouters & Martens: 46, erroneous authority year (C, D, H). 1994
S. hamigera
.—Danielopol
et al
.: 121 (D).
2000
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1946
.—Meisch: 465, 467, 468, 469 Fig. 191 D–J (C, D, H, K, R, T).
2014a
Sphaeromicola hamigera
Remy, 1946
.—Mestre, Monrós & Mesquita-Joanes: 951 (C).
Remarks:
Sphaeromicola hamiger
was elevated to species by
Remy (1948a: 129)
, but with the original suffix for species name.
Paris (1920b: 485)
seemed somewhat unsure of his record of
S
.
topsenti
on
Caecosphaeroma virei
from the cave of Baume-les-Messieurs in the Jura Mountains of
France
, and suggested that additional material was needed to confirm identification; this record was based on examination of a single adult male.
Remy (1951: 224–225)
noted that
S
.
hamigera
was the only species he had recovered from both the host species,
C
.
virei
, and the cave Baume-les-Messieurs. As such, Remy believed that Paris’ Jura Mountains record of
S
.
topsenti
was almost undoubtedly
S
.
hamigera
. This putative corrected identification was recalled in
Meisch (2000: 468)
.
Hart & Hart (1974: 165)
erroneously list the figure for this species as appearing on Plate XLIII as Fig. 15, when in fact it is
Fig. 1
on the Plate XLIV, on the following page.