Tychobythinus inopinatus, a new troglobitic species from Sicily (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae)
Author
Sabella, Giorgio
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, section Animal Biology, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy. sabellag @ unict. it; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 2234 - 1901
Author
Costanzo, Salvatore
Centro Universitario per la Tutela e la Gestione degli Ambienti Naturali e degli Agroecosistemi, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 98, 95123 Catania, Italy .. scostanz @ unict. it; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 6103 - 6929
Author
Nicolosi, Giuseppe
Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy & Centro Speleologico Etneo, via Valdisavoia 3, 95123 Catania, Italy
text
Zootaxa
2020
2020-05-19
4779
2
273
281
journal article
22027
10.11646/zootaxa.4779.2.8
e3bd629a-61b2-4a04-b881-6d140b27632d
1175-5326
3833583
F187FD14-DDE5-4FD5-AD5C-554FB22579D3
Tychobythinus inopinatus
Sabella, Costanzo and Nicolosi
,
sp. nov.
(
Figs. 6–16
)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
40039BFF-19D6-4966-B466-9D31DA9FEC5F
Type material
.
Holotype
:
ITALY
:
Sicily Region
:
Syracuse
,
Monello Cave
,
22.X.2019
, trap 17,
1 ♂
,
G. Nicolosi
leg. (
DBUC
)
.
Paratypes
(all
17 specimens
in
DBUC
):
ITALY
:
Sicily Region
:
1 ♀
, same data of
holotype
;
1 ♀
, same data of
holotype
,
but trap
8
;
1 ♀
, same data of
holotype
,
but trap
10
;
1 ♂
, same data of
holotype
,
but trap
12
;
1 ♀
, same data of
holotype
,
but trap
16
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
31.
VII
.2019
, trap 10,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
2 ♀♀
, same data,
but trap
12
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
22.VIII.2019
, trap 12,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
05.IX.2019
, trap 12,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
19.IX.2019
, trap 17,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
07.X.2019
, trap 10,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
1 ♀
, same data,
but trap
17
;
1 ♀
, same locality,
07.XI.2019
, trap 10,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
;
3 ♀♀
, same locality,
05.XII.2019
, trap 10,
G. Nicolosi
leg.
Description
.
Male
(
Fig. 6
): Length
1.30–1.35 mm
, apterous and anophthalmous. Pale brown or brown with lighter antennae, palpi, and legs. Pubescence consists of long and flattened setae (length:
0.07–0.08 mm
) on head, pronotum, elytra, and abdomen, other suberect shorter setae (length:
0.03–0.04 mm
) on antennae, and legs, and thin fluff on apical segment of maxillary palpi.
Head (
Fig 8
) wider (
0.30 mm
) than long (
0.24 mm
) narrower than pronotum. Frontal lobe wider (
0.175 mm
) than long (
0.08 mm
) with subparallel, protruding and sharp sides; antennal tubercle protruding. Frons between antennal tubercles with large median sulcus reaching anterior edge of vertexal foveae. Median clypeal carina welldefined, equally visible in dorsal as well as lateral view, extending to ocular region. Tempora rounded, convex occipital region traversed by median longitudinal sulcus, extending to posterior edge of vertexal foveae, these last wide and well-impressed. Gular region (
Figs 10–11
) behind labium with deep and broad impression margined pos- teriorly by transverse ridge projecting and laterally recurved backwards on each side of head. This ridge with long and acute median process, process projecting ventrally and ending with a bifid tuft of setae on the tips. Base of median process enlarged posteriorly in an oval impression, at base with two long and sturdy median bristles. Antennae
0.65–0.66 mm
long, scape more than 4 times longer (
0.19–0.20 mm
) than wide (
0.045 mm
), narrowed and flattened with sharp medial margin on basal third, wider at middle. Pedicel ovoid, slightly asymmetric, about 1.5 times longer than wide, about as wide as scape, and wider than funicular segments. Antennomere III distinctly longer than wide and narrowed at base; antennomeres IV and V about as long as wide, antennomeres VI–VII wider than long, antennomeres VI shorter and closer than VII; antennomeres VIII wider than long, and wider than VII. Antennal club consisting of last three antennomeres which are widening progressively from IX to XI. Antennomeres IX and X distinctly wider than long, antennomere XI distinctly longer than wide and twice as long as combined length of antennomeres IX and X. Maxillary palpi (
Fig. 13
) with palpomere IIs elongate and gradually expanded from base to apex, their surface covered by 8-10 tubercles. Palpomeres III slightly longer than wide, surface with 4–6 tubercles; last palpomere about 5 times as long (
0.29 mm
) as wide (
0.055 mm
), widest at basal third, lateral margin distinctly curved and sinuate at middle.
FIGURES 6–7
.
Tychobythinus inopinatus
sp. nov.
habitus, dorsal view. 6. Holotype, male. 7. Paratype, female (Ph. G. Nicolosi). Scale: 0.1 mm.
Pronotum wider (
0.31 mm
) than long (
0.295 mm
), widest near middle, anteriorly narrowed with convergent sides, posteriorly very slightly narrowed with rounded and subparallel sides very flattened laterally. Dorsal surface shiny with some sparse and faint punctures. Two well-impressed antebasal lateral foveae linked by wide antebasal sulcus. Tegument between pronotal posterior margin and antebasal sulcus rough, makeing it difficult to see small median antebasal fovea. Metaventrite distinctly raised at middle, its surface with dense and large punctures, with median sulcus beginning from its posterior margin and extending to just posterior to mesocoxal cavities. Base of mesocoxal cavities with pubescent lateral mesosternal fovea on each side.
Elytra distinctly wider (
0.57 mm
) than long (
0.52 mm
), convex, sides slightly rounded from base to the apex, widest near middle. Humeral calli strongly reduced. Dorsal surface shiny with only some superficial punctures. Each elytron with two basal foveae, subhumeral fovea well-defined. Both marginal and sutural striae reaching to about elytral apices, discal striae lacking.
Abdomen normally shaped without species-specific characters.
Legs relatively long and thin. Protrochanters with 1–2 tubercles on ventral surface, protibiae slightly flattened and sinuate at distal third, protarsomere II slightly dilated. Meso- and metatrochanters simple; femora simple, mesotibiae slightly enlarged and sinuate for distal third, length of metatibiae:
0.45–0.46 mm
, slightly enlarged and sinuate for distal third.
Aedeagus (
Fig. 14
)
0.325–0.33 mm
long, ovoid with relatively short parameres, parameres convergent and with narrow apex, each bearing two subapical setae. Internal sac (
Figs 14–15
) with two long apophyses converging to apices with numerous spines.
Female
(
Fig. 7
): Similar to male, length
1.30–1.35 mm
, head (
Fig. 9
) slightly wider (
0.25–0.26 mm
) than long (
0.23–0.24 mm
), gular region unmodified, slightly convex. Antennae (
Fig. 12
) a little shorter (length:
0.63-0.64 mm
) and with sligthly thinner antennomeres than in male; surface of palpomere II covered by 10–14 tubercles, anterior sides of pronotum narrower than in male. Metaventrite lacking median impression; legs with protibiae, tarsomere II of protarsi, and metatibiae unmodified. Telisternite as in
Fig. 16
.
FIGURES 8–11
.
Tychobythinus inopinatus
sp. nov.
8. Male head in dorsal view, schematic drawning. 9. Female head in dorsal view, schematic drawning. 10. Paratype male, head, lateral view (Ph. G. Nicolosi). 11. Paratype male, head, ventral view (Ph. G. Nicolosi). Scale: 0.1 mm.
FIGURES 12–16
.
Tychobythinus inopinatus
sp. nov.
12. Paratype female, left antenna. 13. Paratype female, right maxillary palpus. 14. Holotype male, aedeagus, dorsal view. 15. Paratype male, internal sac of aedeagus, dorsal view. 16. Paratype female, telisternite, dorsal view. Scale: 0.1 mm.
Discussion.
Tychobythinus inopinatus
sp. nov
.
differs from all other congeneric species by its aedeagal and exoskeletal features. It shares affinities with
Tychobythinus villasmundi
Sabella, Amore, Nicolosi, 2019
, however it differs from the latter in numerous characters: antennal scape more than 4 times longer than wide (less than 4 times longer than wide for
T. villasmundi
); last palpomere about 5 times longer than wide, with lateral margin distinctly curved and sinuate at middle (about 4 times longer than wide with lateral margin slightly curved and sinuate at middle for
T. villasmundi
), different shape of gular ridge of male (cfr.
Figs 10–11
with
Figs
8–9
in
Sabella
et al.
2019
), aedeagus with different apical morphology of the parameres, which are not narrowed in
T. inopinatus
sp. nov
.
, and are distinctly narrowed in
T. villasmundi
(cfr.
Fig. 14
with
Fig.
12
in
Sabella
et al
. 2019
), and differences of the internal sac (cfr.
Figs 14–15
with
Fig.
12
in
Sabella
et al
. 2019
).
Like
T. villasmundi
,
T
.
inopinatus
sp. nov
.
shares affinities to the congeneric species from North Africa which belong to two distinct groups (
Sabella
et al.
2014
). However, they do not represent, with certainty, two homogeneous phyletic lineages because their external morphology is closely related to their different levels of adaptation to endogean life.
The aedeagus of
T. inopinatus
sp. nov
.
is comparable to the species belonging to the
Tychobythinus algiricus
group (
Sabella
et al.
2014
;
Chiasmatobythus sensu
Jeannel 1956
), due to their troglobitic adaptations.
T. inopinatus
sp. nov
.
is externally close to the species belonging to the
Tychobythinus theryi
group (
Sabella
et al
. 2013
;
Anopsibythus sensu
Jeannel 1956
).
Among
the material examined we also found a female collected in
Monello Cave
,
06.VI.2019
, trap 13,
G. Nicolosi
leg. (
DBUC
), with only 10 antennomeres, and with antennomere
VI
distinctly longer than wide, which is probably derived from the fusion of antennomers
VI
and
VII
.
This
specimen has been excluded from the
type
series
.
Finally, it seems interesting to underline that the previous research conducted inside Monello Cave in 1991 (
Caruso 1995
), which used the same collection techniques, did not produce any specimens of the new species. On the contrary, our investigation that began on
11 January 2019
and is still in progress allowed us to collect, in addition to the species relieved in the previous study,
18 specimens
(
2 males
and
16 females
) of the new species of
Tychobythinus
in various areas of the cave, but only during the period from
August to December 2019
.
This fact could be explained considering that the ecological conditions inside the cave have improved signifi- cantly in the last thirty years, probably in relation to the implemented strict conservation measures, but the factors driving this change certainly deserve further study (with a careful comparison of the environmental data emerged from the study conducted in 1991 and in 2019), which however goes beyond the purpose of this article.
A simpler explanation can be provided by the different sampling periods for the two research programs: research in 1991 covered the period January–July, while our research program, still in progress, covered the entire year of 2019, with collection of the new species happening between August and December, a period not covered by the previous research program.