Revision of Macropygium Spinola, 1837 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Ochlerini) with the revalidation of three species and the description of one new species Author Silva, Layse Mitsue Harada Da 0000-0002-0143-2898 mitsuehs @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 0143 - 2898 mitsuehs@gmail.com Author Campos, Luiz Alexandre text Zootaxa 2021 2021-04-14 4958 1 605 627 journal article 7200 10.11646/zootaxa.4958.1.36 ffb2d1bf-4968-4716-9049-7dd3666d2c31 1175-5326 4692609 1616997B-867D-45CD-8470-515C39815F89 Macropygium spinolae Stål, 1860 , REVISED STATUS ( Figs 1C–D ; 4E–H ; 5D–F, P–R ; 6B ; 7B ; 8 ; 9 ; 13 ; Table 1 ) Macropygium spinolae Stål, 1860: 18 (removed from the synonymy with M. reticulare ). Ochlerus guttipes Walker, 1867: 193 NEW SYNONYMY (removed from the synonymy with M. reticulare ). Type specimens ( Figs 8 , 9 ): Macropygium spinolae Stål, 1860 , holotype female ( NHRS ) ( Fig. 8 ). BRASIL . Labels: Brasil // F. Sahlb // M. spinolae / Typus Stål / (det. BM [illegible]) // subsulca / tum. / A. et S. // NHRS-GULI / 000055245 // Typus. Ochlerus guttipes Walker, 1867 , holotype female ( NHMUK ), collection site unknown ( Fig. 9 ). Labels: Ochlerus / guttipes / Walker, 1867: 193 // Holo- / type // 56 / 143 // 3. Ochlerus guttipes . // BRIT. MUS. / TYPE No. / HEM. 687 // Type // // Holo- / type. Distribution: Mexico , Guatemala , Honduras , Nicaragua , Costa Rica , Panama , Venezuela , Colombia , Brazil , Peru , Bolivia , Paraguay , Argentina ( Fig. 13 ). Material examined: ARGENTINA , Corrientes , 1♀ , 1991 ( DAR ) ; Chaco , Charata , 3♀ , 1996 ( JEE ), [-27.216 -61.2] . BOLIVIA , Santa Cruz , Saavedra , 1♂ , 1959 ( DAR ), [-17. 252 -63. 211]; Entre rios , 1♂ , 1996 ( JEE ), [-31.75 -60.5]; BOLIVIA , Santa Cruz , Buena Vista , 1♂ , 1961 ( DAR ), [ -17.666 -63.733 ] . BRASIL , Amazonas , Manaus , 1♂ , 1929, [-3.1 -60.016]; Benjamim Constante , 1♂ , 1942 ( AMNH ), [ -4.376 -70.030 ]; Mato Grosso , Aripuana , 1♀ , 1978, [ 27.183 -52.383 ]; 1♀ , 1976 ( AMNH ) ; Minas Gerais , Viçosa , 1♂ , 1944 ( USNM ) , [ -20.753 -42.881 ]; Santa Catarina , Nova Teutonia , 1♀ , 1948 ( AMNH ) , [ 27.183 -52.383 ]; Nova Teutonia , 1♂ , 1957 ( AMNH ) , [ 27.1833 - 52.383 ]; Nova Teutonia , 2♀ , 1963 ( DAR ) ; Nova Teutonia , 1♀ , 1969 ( AMNH ) , [ 27.183 -52.383 ]; Nova Teutonia , 1♀ , 1♂ , 1974 ( DAR ) , [ 27.183 -52.3833 ]; Nova Teutonia , 15♀ , 10♂ , 1975 ( DAR ) , [ 27.183 -52.383 ]; Pará , Almerim , 1♀ , 1981 ( DAR ) , [ -1.520 -52.581 ]; São Paulo , São Paulo , 1♂ , 1944 ( MCN ) ; São Paulo , 1♂ , 1954 ( MZSP ) , [ -4.376 -70.030 ]; São Paulo , 1♀ , 1961 ( MZSP ) ; 1♂ , 1962 ( MZSP ) ; 2♀ , 1974 ( DAR ) . COLOMBIA , 1♀ , 1973 ( DAR ) [ 4.205 -69.932 ]; COSTA RICA , Guanacaste , 1♂ , 1990 ( JEE ) , [10.99 -85.42]; Heredia , Chilamate , 1♀ , 1995 ( JEE ) , [10.45 -84.066]; Puntarena , Buenos Aires , 2♂ , 1988 ( JEE ), [ 9.169 -83.330 ] ; GUATEMALA , Suchitepequez , 2♀ , 2005 ( JEE ), [ 14.516 -90.866 ]; HONDURAS , 1♀ , 1993 ( FSCA ) ; Olancho , 1♀ , 1♂ ( JEE ), [15.139 -86.67]; MEXICO , Chiapas , Tapilula , 1♂ , 1983 ( DAR ) ; Chiriqui , Boquete , 1♂ , 1939; El Passo , 1♂ , 1970 ( FSCA ) ; Gamboa , 1♂ , 1944; Herrera , Chepo , 1♀ , 1956,[ 7.733 -80.816 ]; Hidalgo , Jacala , 1♀ , 1982 ( DAR ) , [ 2.100 -99.171 ]; Minera autlan, 1♂ , 1983 ( DAR ) ; San Luis Potosi , 1♀ , 1963 ( FSCA ) ; 1♀ , 1968 ( FSCA ) 1♀ , 1981 ( FSCA ) ; Minera autlan, 24♀ , 1982 ( DAR ) ; Oaxaca , 1♂ , 1974 ( DAR ) ; Quintana , 1♂ , 1983 ( DAR ) ; Felipe Carrillo Puerto , 1♀ , 1♂ , 1990 ( FSCA ) , [ 19.577 -88.045 ]; San Francisco , 1♀ , 1937; Tres rios , 1♂ , 1931; Gatunlake , 1♀ , 1♂ , 1931; Vera Cruz , Vera Cruz , 3♀ , 1963 ( FSCA ) ; Cordoba , 1♂ , 1964; Yucatan , 1♀ , 1990 ( DAR ) ; PANAMA , Arraijan , Cerro galera, 3♂ , 1895 ( DAR ) [ 89.333 -79.616 ]; Barro Colorado , 4♀ , 1♂ , 1962 ( AMNH ) , [9.15 -79.85]; 1♀ , 1963; Canal zone, 2♀ , 1♂ ,1967, ( DAR ) ; Margarita , 2♀ , 2♂ , 1972 ( DAR ) , [ 9.384 -79.883 ]; Canal zone, 2♀ , 1♂ , 1972 ( DAR ) , [ 9.384 - 79.883 ]; 2♂ , 1974 ( DAR ) ; Canal zone, 1♂ , 1982 ( JEE ) ; Panama , 1♀ , 1984 ( FSCA ) ; Cerro Gaital , 1♀ , 1985 ( DAR ) ; 1♂ , 1987 ( DAR ) ; Cidade do Panama , Parque nacional Soberania Pipeline , 1♂ , 1993 ( DAR ) . PARAGUAY , Itapua , Hohenau , 1♂ , 1983 ( DAR ), [ -27.078 -55.645 ]. PERU , Satipo , 1♀ , 1930 ( AMNH ) ; 1♂ , 1940 ( USNM ) ; Tingo Maria , Yurac , 1♀ , 1954, [ -13.722 -70.686 ]; 1♀ , 1968 ( AMNH ) ; Estancia naranjal, 1♂ , 1965 ( AMNH ) ; Yarina cocha, 1♀ , 1♂ , 1968 ( AMNH ) ; Chikiaco , 2♀ , 1978 ( DAR ) ; Lamas Caynarachi , 1♀ , 1♂ 2008 . VENEZUELA , Merida , Merida , 1♂ , 1974 ( DAR ) ; Tachira , 1♂ , 1980; Lara , 1♀ , 1981 ( FSCA ) ; 1♂ ( FSCA ) . Diagnosis. Antennae five-segmented, first and second antennomeres subequal in length; segment X of pygophore wider than long, apex rounded with abundant setae; lateral angles of laterotergites VIII projected well beyond the line connecting the mesial thrichobotria of urosternite VII, and covering completely the base of laterotergites IX. Male. Genitalia: conical projection of the ventral rim of pygophore single, with apical setae; posterolateral angles narrowly rounded at apex, medial projection of posterolateral angles tumescent, much shorter than the dorsal limit of segment X in lateral view; lateral projection of dorsal rim thin, spine like and lateral to the posterolateral angle; segment X covered by setae, as wide as high in posterior view, and as wide as long in ventral view ( Fig. 4 E–H ); apical projection of parameres short, with tuft of setae, largest axis of head less than half the length of stem ( Fig. 5D–F ); phallus with 2 + 2 lateral projections of vesica; ductus seminis distalis twisted, bifid at secondary gonopore; thin conjunctiva accompanying the full length of ductus seminis distalis ( Fig. 5P–R ). FIGURE 9. Holotype of Ochlerus guttipes Walker, 1867 (= Macropygium spinolae Stål, 1860 ). Dorsal, ventral, and lateral view (A–C), respectively, genital plates in ventroposterior view (D), labels (E). Female. Genitalia: Valvifers VIII longer than wide, covering completely the basal portion of the laterotergites IX; lateral angles well projected, surpassing the lateral margin of laterotergites IX and the imaginary line connecting the mesial thrichobotria of urosternite VII; lateral margin of valvifers VIII deflected, covering the limit between laterotergites VIII and IX ( Fig. 6B ). Folds of valvulae IX with conical microsculptures; thickening of vaginal intima thin and translucent; ring sclerites half the diameter of orificium receptaculi, this about half the width of vaginal intima ( Fig. 7B ). Comments. Considerations on the distribution and differential diagnosis of M. spinolae are as treated in the comments made for M. reticulare .