Anabarites tristichus Missarzhevsky

Kouchinsky, Artem, Bengtson, Stefan, Landing, Ed, Steiner, Michael, Vendrasco, Michael & Ziegler, Karen, 2017, Terreneuvian stratigraphy and faunas from the Anabar Uplift, Siberia, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (2), pp. 311-440 : 420

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00289.2016

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD87A8-FFF6-6D4A-FFF3-FC1863B1820D

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Anabarites tristichus Missarzhevsky
status

 

Anabarites tristichus Missarzhevsky in Rozanov et al., 1969

Fig. 76A–C, F View Fig .

Material.—Several hundred internal moulds, including figured SMNH X3671, 3672, 6027, from samples 3/12, 3/12.2, K2/25 (section 3, Fig. 3), 5/0 and 5a/34.75 (sections 96-5 and 96-5a, Fig. 2 View Fig ), from the Medvezhya and Emyaksin formations, and two celestite-barite replaced tubes with internal moulds, including figured SMNH X3409, from sample K2/26, Medvezhya Formation, Anabar Uplift, Siberian Platform, Russia. Correlated with the upper Fortunian and lower part of Cambrian Stage 2.

Description.—Almost straight, slightly torted tubes with rounded hexagonal aperture. Walls with transverse flanges and thin, shallow growth lines. Three broad, flattened longitudinal lobes separated by shallow depressions. Internal, short protrusions of the wall are impressed into each longitudinal depression and essentially extend as a dashed line on the internal moulds from the apex to the aperture along the three longitudinal depressions ( Fig. 76A, B, F View Fig ).

Remarks.— Anabarites tristichus tubes preserved in celestite and barite are discussed by Kouchinsky and Bengtson 2002) and Kouchinsky et al. (2009). The first illustration of anabaritids from Siberia was published by Sysoev (1965: fig. 2) under the name Hyolithellus sp. (recognized by Kouchinsky et al. [2009] as A. tristichus Missarzhevsky in Rozanov et al., 1969). The age of A. tristichus ( Hyolithellus sp. Sysoev [1965: fig. 2]) from “the Atdabanian Horizon” from a locality on the left bank of the Kotuj River, 6 km downstream from the mouth of the Kotujkan River on the western flank of the Anabar Uplift) is questionable. It is not clear from which level of the outcrop the specimen was collected. It probably came from the Kugda-Yuryakh Formation, and, thus, can be correlated with lower part of Cambrian Stage 2.

Stratigraphic and geographic range.— Terreneuvian Series and lower Stage 3; Siberia and Gondwana (South China).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Genus

Anabarites

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF