Pseudoeupolyphaga pilosa ( Qiu, Che & Wang, 2018 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1211.128805 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F918E1DE-ADA2-47B6-A711-EEA23DA861B7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13684873 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/097BDB37-4663-56DA-8E0D-859D7FBEE141 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pseudoeupolyphaga pilosa ( Qiu, Che & Wang, 2018 ) |
status |
|
Pseudoeupolyphaga pilosa ( Qiu, Che & Wang, 2018)
Figs 13 A – J View Figure 13 , 15 F, G, O, P View Figure 15
Eupolyphaga pilosa Qiu, Che & Wang, 2018: 50; Qiu et al. 2019: 11 (catalogue). View Cited Treatment
Pseudoeupolyphaga pilosa : Han et al. 2024: 166 View Cited Treatment .
Type locality.
“ Yunnan Province, Diqing Prefecture, Weixi County, Pantiange Township, A valley Near Zhazi; 2970 m ”
New material examined.
China • 1 male, 2 females; Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, Yulong Snow Mountain, Blue Moon Valley ; 24 Jul. 2022; Wei Han, Lin Guo leg • 1 male, 1 female; Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, Wenbi Mountain ; 24 Jul. 2022; Wei Han, Lin Guo leg • 1 male, 4 nymphs; Yunnan Province, Weixi County, Badi Village, Luodatang countryside ; 25 Jul. 2022; Wei Han, Xin-Xing Luo, Lin Guo leg.
Remarks.
This species was previously only documented in Pantiange Township, Weixi County, Yunnan Province. However, a recent collection in Yunnan has expanded its distribution range. In samples collected at various sites, the density of markings on the male tegmina varied (Fig. 13 A – F View Figure 13 ). Markedly sparser markings were observed on the samples from Pantiange Township ( Qiu et al. 2018: fig. 8 A, B) and Luodatang countryside in Weixi County (Fig. 13 A, B View Figure 13 ) compared to those from Yulong Snow Mountain (Fig. 13 C, D View Figure 13 ) and Wenbi Mountain (Fig. 13 E, F View Figure 13 ). Additionally, the male abdomens of samples from Pantiange Township, Yulong Snow Mountain, and Wenbi Mountain were dark brown to black, while those from Luodatang countryside were yellowish-brown.
Genetic distance analyses revealed that the genetic distance between samples from the four different collection sites ranged from 3.92 % to 7.54 %. Given the proximity of these new distributions to the type locality, and the absence of significant differences in oothecae (Fig. 15 F, G, O, P View Figure 15 ; Qiu et al. 2018: fig. 38 I, Q), the samples from the new location were temporarily classified as distinct geographic populations of P. pilosa .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudoeupolyphaga pilosa ( Qiu, Che & Wang, 2018 )
Han, Wei, Che, Yan-Li, Zhang, Pei-Jun & Wang, Zong-Qing 2024 |
Eupolyphaga pilosa
Qiu L & Yang ZB & Wang ZQ & Che YL 2019: 11 |
Qiu L & Che YL & Wang ZQ 2018: 50 |