Nebrius thielensi (Winkler, 1874),

Ebersole, Jun A., Cicimurri, David J. & Stringer, Gary L., 2019, Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the elasmobranchs and bony fishes (Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes) of the lower-to-middle Eocene (Ypresian to Bartonian) Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA, inclu, European Journal of Taxonomy 585, pp. 1-274: 23-26

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.585

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:181B6FBA-ED75-4BB4-84C4-FB512B794749

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3664488

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/18174D41-FF93-FFB6-FD94-98114E8F0B8E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Nebrius thielensi (Winkler, 1874)
status

 

Nebrius thielensi (Winkler, 1874) 

Fig. 7View Fig I–T

Plicodus thielensis Winkler, 1874a: 301  , pl. 7, fig. 5.

Acrodobatis obliquus Leidy, 1877: 250  , pl. 34, fig. 14.

Ginglymostoma blankenhorni Stromer, 1905b: 34  , pl. 1, fig. 6.

Ginglymostoma thielensis – Daimeries 1889: 9  .

Ginglymostoma aff. thielensi – Casier 1958: 17  , pl. 1, fig. 7.

Nebrius thielensi – Herman & Crochard 1977: 133  .

Ginglymostoma  sp. cf. G. blankenhorni – Thurmond & Jones 1981: 45  , fig. 11.

Nebrius thielensi – Clayton et al. 2013  : fig 2b–c.

Nebrius obliquus – Cappetta & Case 2016: 48  , pl. 2, figs 1–4.

Material examined

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – Alabama • 170 isolated teeth; Claiborne Group ; MSC 38785View Materials, ALMNH PV1992.28.36, ALMNH PV1992.28.5 (2 specimens), ALMNH PV2005.6.434, MMNS VP- 8211 (2 specimens), MSC 2174.1 2, MSC 2387, MSC 33263View Materials, MSC 34407.1 9, MSC 35755.1 20, MSC 37124.1 2, MSC 37175View Materials, MSC 37266.1 4, MSC 37272View Materials, MSC 37336.1 5, MSC 37341.1 7, MSC 37441.1 6, MSC 37496.1 5, MSC 37652View Materials, MSC 37677.1 6, MSC 38502.1 5, MSC 38549.1 3, MSC 38777View Materials, NJSM 24017View Materials, SC 2012.47.40, SC 2012.47.41, SC 2012.47.42, SC 2012.47.43, SC 2012.47.44 (20 specimens), SC 2012.47.183 (16 specimens), WSU 5013View Materials (3 specimens), WSU 5035View Materials (37 specimens), WSU 6View Materials, WSU CC 504View Materials (2 specimens)  .

Description

Tooth crown with tall median cusp flanked by numerous mesial and distal cusplets that decrease in size towards the crown margins. More cusplets on mesial side of cusp than on distal side, particularly on lateral teeth, resulting in strong crown asymmetry especially when median cusp is distally inclined. Mesial edge of crown strongly convex, whereas distal edge more or less straight. Prominent labial apron present, which is often bifid but can be uniformly rounded. Lingual and labial crown faces smooth, but faint wrinkles may be present on labial apron. Labial edge of apron overhangs the root. Both crown faces convex, but more so lingually. Prominent medial protuberance on lingual face has rounded lingual margin. Root thin with sub-triangular basal outline, and lobes do not extend past the lateral margins of the crown. Root base flat with deep nutritive groove that opens labially. Marginolingual foramina present on lingual root face.

Remarks

Thurmond & Jones (1981: fig. 11) figured a specimen from the Tallahatta Formation at site AMo-8 that they referred to Ginglymostoma  sp. cf. blankenhorni  . However, not only was this species later designated a junior synonym of Nebrius obliquus ( Leidy, 1877)  by Noubhani & Cappetta (1997), but a reexamination of the specimen ( ALMNH PV 2005.6.434) by the present authors revealed that it belongs to Nebrius thielensi  . Holman & Case (1988), Feldmann & Portell (2007), and Clayton et al. (2013), each reported the recovery of Nebrius  teeth from site ACov- 11 in Covington County, AL, the latter two referring their specimens to Nebrius thielensi Winkler, 1874  . In contrast, Cappetta & Case (2016) later reported 174 Nebrius  teeth from the same locality and referred all to N. obliquus  . In justifying the referral of their teeth to N. obliquus  as opposed to N. thielensi, Cappetta & Case (2016)  explained that the teeth of the latter generally have a thicker apron that is less prominent and at times bifid, as seen on the type specimen of Winkler (1874a). On the other hand, Cappetta & Case (2016) noted that on N. obliquus  , the apron is more prominent and much more oblique on some teeth, as seen in Leidy’s (1877) type specimen. Noubhani & Cappetta (1997) had previously stated that N. obliquus  was typical of Ypresian deposits, whereas N. thielensi  was of middle Eocene age.

Of the Nebrius  teeth in our sample (n= 170), we observed that the shape of the labial crown apron varies from rounded, to flat, to bifid. The length of the apron also varies from short and rather narrow on specimens with bifid to flat aprons, to wide and elongate on specimens with rounded aprons. Although this might suggest the presence of two species, this variance in apron morphology is also seen within the dentitions of the Recent Nebrius ferrugineus (Lesson, 1831)  , where the teeth in the more anterior positions have short bifid aprons, but the aprons become more rounded and prominent in the lateral positions. Due to the variation observed within this extant analogue, it is our conclusion that the differences in apron morphology in our sample is not an indication of separate species (in this case N. obliquus  and N. thielensi  ), but rather a reflection of heterodonty. Noubhani & Cappetta (1997) cited further differences between the teeth of N. obliquus  and N. thielensi  , stating that the labial crown profiles on the teeth of N. thielensi  are less concave than those on N. obliquus  . However, this characteristic can also be observed on the teeth in the Recent Nebrius ferrugineus  jaw, as the labial crown face is flatter on the teeth in the anterior positions (i.e., the teeth with bifid aprons) and more concave in the lateral positions (i.e., teeth with rounded aprons). Thus, with a lack of characteristics to sufficiently separate these two taxa, it is our opinion that N. obliquus  from the Claibornian of Alabama should be considered a junior synonym of N. thielensi  , and all our Claiborne Group Nebrius  teeth are therefore assigned to this latter species.

Some of the Claibornian specimens in our sample superficially resemble teeth of Ginglymostoma angolense  . However, based on a sample from the Thanetian Williamsburg Formation of South Carolina (in the collections of SC), teeth of G. angolense  have a large main cusp relative to tooth size, and the labial apron is rather narrow and short (see also Dartevelle & Casier 1943; Arambourg 1952; Noubhani & Cappetta 1997). In contrast, the Alabama specimens have a rather small main cusp and the labial apron is wide and elongated.

Stratigraphic and geographic range in Alabama

The specimens in our sample were derived from the Tallahatta Formation at sites ADl-1 and AMo-8, the contact of the Tallahatta and Lisbon formations and the basal Lisbon Formation at sites ACh-14 and ACov-11, the basal Gosport Sand at site ACl-4, and the Gosport Sand at site ACh-21. Lower Lutetian to middle Bartonian, zones NP14 to NP17.

Orectolobiformes  indet.

Fig. 8View Fig

Material examined

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – Alabama • 1 isolated tooth; Claiborne Group ; SC 2012.47.45  .

Description

Miniscule tooth measuring 1.2 mm in width and 1 mm in preserved height. Crown with broad-based main cusp flanked by single pair of lateral cusplets. Labial face of main cusp weakly convex and lingual face strongly convex, smooth lateral cutting edges extend from cusp base to broken apical region. Cusplets broad, pointed, with convex labial and lingual faces and smooth lateral cutting edges. Entire labial face weakly convex and lacks ornamentation. Labial crown foot forms basally flattened apron that overhangs the root. Lingual face very convex, with elongated medial basal uvula that extends onto dorsal surface of root. Root largely incomplete, but single pair of large dorsolingual root foramina flank the lingual crown uvula.

Remarks

SC 2012.47.45 resembles teeth of Chiloscyllium Müller & Henle, 1837  in having a wide, low crown bearing a robust medial cusp that is flanked by a single pair of rather large lateral cusplets, and a broad, somewhat bifid labial apron. In contrast, the similar teeth of Hemiscyllium Müller & Henle, 1838  have reduced or absent lateral cusplets and the labial apron is less rounded and more concave in oral view (Herman 1977; Noubhani & Cappetta 1997; Adnet 2006). SC 2012.47.45 is also similar to teeth of Delpitoscyllium africanum ( Leriche, 1927)  in that it appears to have had a large main cusp, and the sides of the crown are rather vertical, but the root is largely missing and the main cusp and lateral cusplets are too ablated to be certain ( Leriche 1927). The specimen can be distinguished from Ginglymostoma  and Nebrius  (see above) in having only a single pair of lateral cusplets, and it lacks the very elongated labial apron of Nebrius  . Although this specimen clearly differs from the other orectolobiforms in our sample, additional, better preserved material is needed in order to more accurately identify the taxon represented by SC 2012.47.45.

Stratigraphic and geographic range in Alabama

The lone specimen in our sample was collected from the basal Lisbon Formation at site ACov-11. Middle Lutetian, Zone NP15.

Order Lamniformes Berg, 1958 

Family Otodontidae Glikman, 1964 

Genus Otodus Agassiz, 1843 

ALMNH

Alabama Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Elasmobranchii

Order

Orectolobiformes

Family

Ginglymostomatidae

Genus

Nebrius

Loc

Nebrius thielensi (Winkler, 1874)

Ebersole, Jun A., Cicimurri, David J. & Stringer, Gary L. 2019
2019
Loc

Plicodus thielensis

Winkler T. C. 1874: 301
Loc

Acrodobatis obliquus

Leidy J. 1877: 250
Loc

Ginglymostoma blankenhorni

Stromer E. 1905: 34
Loc

Ginglymostoma thielensis –

Daimeries A. 1889: 9
Loc

Ginglymostoma aff. thielensi –

Casier E. 1958: 17
Loc

Nebrius thielensi –

Herman J. & Crochard M. 1977: 133
Loc

Ginglymostoma

Thurmond J. T. & Jones D. E. 1981: 45
Loc

Nebrius obliquus –

Cappetta H. & Case G. R. 2016: 48