Rudolphia macrodactylus, Grosso, Luis E. & Peralta, Marcela, 2009
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.190647 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6212601 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A77D8794-EB2D-FB66-FF2C-FECFFEDEFC4F |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Rudolphia macrodactylus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Rudolphia macrodactylus n. sp.
( Figs. 1–5 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )
Material studied. Holotype male 5.34 mm. Allotype female 5.8 mm ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 a), Paratype female 6.1 mm.
Type locality: Rucapihuel, Prov. Osorno- X Región Chile. 40º 35’S 73º34’W. In the water within burrows of Virilastacus rucapihuelensis , at 10 cm depth, 02/09/2002, Francisco Retamal and Erich Rudolph col.. Specimens deposited in the collection at Fundación Miguel Lillo (= FML), Argentina (Holotype FML 0 0 980, Allotype FML 0 0 981, Paratype FML 00982).
Additional material: 7 males, same date, collector, habitat and locality as type material ( FML 00983); 15 females, 16 males and 8 inmatures, from the water of a peat bog located 10 m from the type habitat, same collectors ( FML 00984); 5 males and 4 females, from swampy terrain, same data as type material, E. Rudolph col. ( FML 00985); 1 male, 1 female and 1 inmature, from a peat bog, same data as type material, E. Rudolph col. ( FML 00986).
Description of male Holotype: Body colorless, not very slender. Dorsum without conspicuous setae. Head subquadrate, anterior margin sinuous. Eyes reduced. Antennae very elongated. Gn1 shorter and more robust than second one. Pleonites deeper than peraeonites, coxal plates 1–4 deeper than 5 –7. Pleonites with posteroventral angles acute and ventral margin naked. Urosomites free and shallower than the peraeonites. Telson excavated.
A1 ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 b; c), as long as body. Second article of peduncle as long as 3/4 of length of article 1 and twice as length of article 3. Outer flagellum with 29 articles, inner flagellum scale shaped with two terminal setae ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 c). First article of peduncle with strong, simple and plumose setae on distal inner surface, and 8 short stout aligned setae plus a pair of medial long, stout and plumose setae inserted behind the row on outer surface. Second article with similar setation as the article 1 and a dorsal medial groove holding a calceolus and two simple setae. Third article with two calceoli-setae complex groups, one dorsomedial with two setae, the other dorsodistal with three setae. Each outer flagellum article with 2–3 distal groups of simple setae, a dorsodistal calceolus on the 12 first articles, some of them with aesthetascs, the 17 distal articles with setae and every two articles with an aesthetasc, always smaller than calceoli. Calceolus morphology ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 a; b) of gammarid structural type ( Lincoln & Hurley, 1981), of the simplest configuration: distal element conformed by 23–26 overlapping transverse plates; proximal element concave and low-cut on inner margin to the distal element; receptacle, bulla and stalk clearly configured.
A2 ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 d) nearly half of body length. Peduncle: articles 4–5 of equal length, both with terminal setae and a group of 2–3 setae halfway on ventral margin. Flagellum with 16 articles, all of them with dorso- and ventrodistal groups of setae and calceoli on articles 1–10, decreasing in size.
Labrum ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 c) oval with scarce short setae on anterior margin.
Right mandible (=Md) ( Fig.1 View FIGURE 1 f) pars incisiva with 6 teeth, 4 short and blunt, 2 stout; lacinia mobilis strong, bicuspidate, with small denticles and one row of fine setae; diastema with 5 serrated setae; pars molaris elevated with oblong triturative surface, one half ridged and incompletely surrounded by denticles; palp triarticulated, medial segment longer than the others, with row of 4 large plumose setae on ventromedial margin, pointed terminal segment with 10 similar setae on ventral margin, a similar seta near articulation. Left Md ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 g) similar to right one, but with 6 serrate setae on diastema and 4 teeth on lacinia mobilis.
Labium ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 h) outer lobes convergent with acute mandibular lobes, inner lobes depressed.
Mx1 asymmetrical. Right Mx1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 a) inner lobe short, distal border oblique with 8 terminal plumose setae; external lobe with 12 setae, internal one pectinate, remaining denticulate. Palp uniform width, basal segment one third of distal segment length with 7 setae on tip: 5 stout and 2 slender; 2 thin setae near tip. Left Mx1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 b) similar to right one, but with 10 setae on external lobe and 6 slender setae on tip of palp.
Mx2 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 c–d) inner lobe elliptic, scarcely shorter than external lobe, ventral surface crossed by oblique row of 9 long plumose setae, 5 fine setae along medial margin, with 3 rows of apical plumose or pectinate setae, one dorsal row of 4 setae, one terminal row of 8 setae and a ventral row of 14 setae. External lobe with 2 rows of pectinate setae, one dorsal with 7 setae and the other of 8 setae.
Maxilliped (=Mxp) ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 e) internal lobe reaching half of external one, with a row of 8 setae on internal surface, with 3 apical robust stout spines alternating with 3 fine pappose setae and a pair of fine external pappose setae. External lobe with 7 blunt setae on internal margin intercalated with 4 fine bifid setae, 4 apical serrate setae. Palp 4-articulated, with abundant setation on internal border, article 1 with 1 seta, article 2 with 25–26 plumodenticulate setae on entire internal border, 6–7 most proximal setae in a simple row and the remaining in a double row, article 3 with internal margin lobulated with 9 bifid plumodenticulated setae, internal face with 4 (3 aligned) bifid plumodenticulate setae. External margin with two groups of setae (4–3), an external one with 2 setae, 1 long simple and 1 bifid, and bipectinate; distal group with 4 bifid bipectinate setae, with small area with microsetae on distal angle. Dactylus small with a fine claw and 5 denticulate setae, external margin with microsetae.
Coxal plates ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 a): 1–4 deeper than wide with 4–5 spinules on ventral margin, plate 4 posteriorly excavated, plate 5 bilobate, plates 6 and 7 smaller, unilobate. Plates 3–7 with coxal gills, coxal gills 3–5, 7 bilobate, coxal gills 6 elliptic. Sternal gills absent.
Gn1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 f) coxal plate: posterior margin with only 1 seta bigger than the spinules of ventral margin; basis with 5 long setae on external face and 4 on internal one and 1 distoventral seta; ischium triangular with 1 distoventral seta; merus quadrangular with a rugose post-ventral lobe and 5 long bifid plumose setae; carpus with rugose posteroventral lobe, two groups of bifid plumose setae: proximally with 5 setae, distal with 7 setae and 3 similar setae on internal face; propodus mitten-like, palmar border flanked on both sides by 5–6 denticulated setae, with 3 bifid strong setae on palmar angle; 6 long setae on distodorsal angle, a group of 3 similar setae and oblique row of 3 setae on internal surface; posterior margin with 2 groups of 4 bipectinate setae. Palmar index ( Ruffo, 1973) = 1.81.
Gn2 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 g): slender and longer than Gn1 with similar spination, although propodus with rugose lobe and merus without them. Palmar index = 2.39.
Peraeopods ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 a–f): P3 and P4 similar, with 4–6 long setae on anterior and posterior margins of basis. P5–P7 increasing in length. Dactyls unusually long.
Pleopods ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 a–d) peduncles with 2 hooked retinacula, biramous, rami 10–12- segmented; peduncle of Pl 1 with row of 4 fine setae. Pl 2 with dimorphism consisting of modifications of 3 last setae of slightly wider exopodite ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 c) with oblique segmentation.
Uropods ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 e–g) biramous, rami uniarticulate, exopodites 1–2 scarcely shorter than endopodites, Ur3 rami of equal length. Ur1 peduncle longer than rami, with internal row of 4 setae, rami with 3–4 internal setae.
Ur2 resembling Ur1 but much shorter. Ur3 subequal in length of Ur2, peduncle shorter than rami, with two internal setae; rami of equal length, acuminated, with 4–5 pairs of setae, each one with a bifid shorter seta and a plumose seta inserted in a fossette.
Telson ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 h): cleft halfway with two lateral pairs of plumose setae, and a long bipectinate seta on each lobule, 4–5 tiny bifid setae on posterior half surface.
Description of Paratype female: Similar to male but with the following differences: A1 and A2 longer, without calceoli, A1 with 34 articles (29 in male) and A2 with 18 articles (16 in male), inner lobe of Mx1 with 10 terminal plumose setae (8 in male), exopodite Pl 2 without modifications in the last 3 setae. Mature females with oostegites foliaceous with simple setae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 f) on peraeonites 2–4 and oostegite oval without setae on 5.
Both female specimens (5.8 mm and 6.1 mm) bigger than males (mean 4.74 mm).
Etymology: Rudolphia macrodactylus refers to the collector surname Erich Rudolph and the unusually length of the pereopods dactyls.
Remarks. Family status
Bousfield (1983: 273) provided a diagnosis of the Paraleptamphopus family group and included them within Eusiroidea. This author listed thirteen characters, only two of which differ from those of Rudolphia n. gen.: large inferior antennal sinus and plate-like coxal gills. Fenwick (2006) described a new genus, Ringanui , with two species, R. koonuiroa and R. toonuiiti , from South Island, New Zealand, and included them within Paraleptamphopidae .
Cladistic analysis. The result of the cladistic analysis was one most parsimonious tree ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) with a score of 83.
| FML |
Fundacion Miguel Lillo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.