Prionospio nonatoi

Peixoto, Antônio João Malafaia & Paiva, Paulo Cesar De, 2019, New Prionospio and Laubieriellus (Annelida: Spionidae) species from Southeastern Brazil, Zootaxa 4577 (3), pp. 529-547: 536-539

publication ID

publication LSID

persistent identifier

treatment provided by


scientific name

Prionospio nonatoi

sp. nov.

Prionospio nonatoi  sp. nov.

( Figures 6–9View FIGURE 6View FIGURE 7View FIGURE 8View FIGURE 9)

Type material. Brazil. Espírito Santo Basin. Holotype: Amb 7 D4, 19° 45' 54.56" S 39° 30' 25.23" W, 12/2011 to 02/ 2012, 144m, MZUSP 3387View Materials. Paratypes: Amb7 B4R1, 20° 35' 25.16" S 39° 54' 58.31" W, 12/2011 to 02/ 2012, 157m, MNRJP 1828 (3 ind), MZUSP 3388View Materials (2 ind), MZUSP 3389View Materials (2 ind)GoogleMaps  .

Additional material: Amb7 B4, 20° 35' 25.16" S 39° 54' 58.31" W, 157m (47 ind); Amb7 D4, 19° 45' 54.56" S 39° 30' 25.23" W, 144m (15 ind); Amb7 E4, 19° 36' 4.32" S 39° 10' 34.07" W, 147m (6 ind).

Diagnostic feature: Branchiae absent.

Description: A small-sized spionid, largest individual about 4.8 mm long, 0.18 mm wide for 65 chaetigers, holotype 4.6 mm long, 0.18 mm wide for 62 chaetigers. Body cylindrical, slightly dorsoventrally compressed throughout body, tapered towards the pygidium ( Fig. 6View FIGURE 6 A–D; 8A). Color in alcohol white. Pigmentation absent.

Prostomium narrow, slightly widened towards the anterior margin, rounded anteriorly, extending posteriorly as a narrow keel to the posterior margin of chaetiger 1 ( Figs 6View FIGURE 6 A–D; 7A; 8A–B). Eyes absent. Prostomial peaks not observed. Prostomium and peristomium well-delimitated by a deep incision ( Figs 6View FIGURE 6 A–D; 8A–B). Peristomium short, surrounding prostomium and partially fused to chaetiger 1, lacking lateral wings. Palps lost in all individuals.

Chaetiger 1 with few and short chaetae on both rami. Postchaetal lamellae auricular, reduced. Prechaetal lamellae absent.

Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliaceous on chaetigers 2–5, largest on chaetiger 3 ( Figs 6View FIGURE 6 A–D; 7A; 8A–B) and smaller on chaetigers 4 and 5. Lamellae rounded from chaetiger 6 to chaetiger 11–14 and reduced to a low flap afterwards. Notopodial prechaetal lamella absent throughout. Dorsal crests low, from chaetiger 8 to chaetiger 10– 15 ( Fig. 8AView FIGURE 8).

Neuropodial postchaetal lamellae of chaetiger 2 well-developed, triangular and elongated ventrally, triangular and not elongated ventrally on chaetiger 3, rounded on chaetigers 4–11 and reduced to a low flap afterwards ( Fig. 6DView FIGURE 6; 8AView FIGURE 8). Neuropodial prechaetal lamellae absent throughout.

Chaetae organized in two rows of sparsely granulated non-limbate capillaries ( Fig. 9AView FIGURE 9). Towards the posterior region, capillaries progressively become elongate, thinner and less numerous ( Fig. 9BView FIGURE 9).

Hooks in notopodia from chaetigers 32–44, up to three per fascicle, accompanied by 1–4 short, non-limbate capillaries. Hooks in neuropodia from chaetigers 11–12, up to seven per fascicle, accompanied by 1–4 non-limbate capillaries. Hooks multidentate, with 8 secondary teeth arranged in two rows above the main tooth (appearing as a single row of 4 secondary teeth in light microscopy) ( Figs 7View FIGURE 7 A–B; 9D). Small secondary hood present ( Fig. 9DView FIGURE 9). Hooks accompanied by 3–10 short non-limbate capillaries.

Non-limbate and sparsely granulated sabre chaetae consistently from chaetiger 10 ( Fig. 9CView FIGURE 9).

Branchiae absent in all individuals ( Figs 6View FIGURE 6 A–D; 7A; 8A–B). Pygidium with a pair of short rounded ventral cirri and a slightly longer mid-dorsal cirrus ( Figs 6EView FIGURE 6; 7DView FIGURE 7).

Oocytes from chaetigers 10–11, measuring up to 80 µm.

Methyl green pattern: Intense staining on prostomium and peristomium.

Remarks: According to Radashevsky (2012), the late development of branchiae on anterior chaetigers is common in Prionospio  , which could lead to the assumption that the species represents a juvenile stage. However, the complete absence of branchiae was observed in all 76 individuals, regardless of size (from 2.5 to 4.8 mm long; from 39 to 65 chaetigers) or sexual maturity.

Owing to the lack of branchiae, the placement of this species in any current genus is problematic, since branchial morphology and distribution are characters of great significance for spionid taxonomy ( Foster 1969, 1971; Blake & Kudenov 1978; Johnson 1984; Maciolek 1985; Blake 1996; Bick 2005; Delgado-Blas 2009; Radashevsky 2012; Blake et al. 2017). For the Prionospio  -complex, lack of branchiae is unusual, shared only with Aurospio abranchiata Neal, Paterson & Soto in Paterson et al., 2016  , although its placement in Aurospio  is questioned by Blake et al. (2017), stating that, recently, several Prionospio  species have been erroneously attributed to Aurospio  .

Among Brazilian species, Prionospio nonatoi  sp. nov. is similar to P. cirrifera  , P. delta Hartman, 1965  , P. fauchaldi Maciolek, 1985  and P. multibranchiata  in having only low dorsal crests and significant overlapping in starting chaetiger of notopodial and neuropodial hooded hooks. However, not only do these species possess branchiae, but P. cirrifera  , P. delta  , and P. multibranchiata  present multiple pairs of smooth apinnate branchiae, while P. fauchaldi  presents distinctly wrinkled branchiae on chaetigers 2–5. Even if branchiae are completely lost in these species, they can still be separated from P. nonatoi  sp. nov. by prostomial shape.

As for Aurospio abranchiata  , both species are similar in having an enlarged notopodial postchaetal lamellae on chaetiger 3, distribution of dorsal crests, lack of branchiae, starting chaetiger of sabre chaetae and hooded hooks and presence of a secondary hood on the hooks. However, they can be separated based on the shape of notopodial postchaetal lamellae from chaetigers 2–5, the shape of neuropodial postchaetal lamellae from chaetigers 2–4 and by bathymetrical distribution.

Etymology: The species name, nonatoi  , is a tribute to Edmundo Ferraz Nonato (1920–2014), who dedicated his life to the study of marine worms and is considered the “father” of Brazilian polychaetology.

Habitat: Fine sand to muddy sand, at 144–153 m depth.

Distribution: Southeast Brazil (Espírito Santos and Campos Basins), and only found during the summer.