Platynopus parvus, (Platynopus), 1900
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD23-FFCC-D68E-F8DDFC5F7057 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Platynopus parvus |
status |
|
parvus (Platynopus) Distant 1900a: 56–57. [ Figs 147–148 View FIGURES 145–152 ]
Original data: “ Long. 9-10 millim.; exp. pronot. angl. 5½-6 millim.”; “ Hab. Sierra Leone (Brit. Mus .); Congo ( Coll. Dist. ).” [syntypes (range of measurements, two countries and two collections)]
SYNTYPE ♁: blue-margined syntype disc; “Popocabacca [=Popokabaka, Democratic Republic of the Congo] F. Loos ”; “ parvus Dist. [Distant’s handwriting]”; “Distant Coll. 1911–383.”; “NHMUK 010592424”. Fourth and fifth right antennomeres, second to fifth left antennomeres, and left posterior leg missing ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 145–152 ) .
SYNTYPE ♁: blue-margined syntype disc; red-margined type disc; “ Sierra Leone / 42 31”; “ parvus Dist. [Distant’s handwriting]”; “a”; “NHMUK 010592450”. Second to fifth right antennomeres, fourth and fifth left antennomeres, anterior legs, left middle leg, and right posterior leg missing ( Fig. 148 View FIGURES 145–152 ) .
Current status: Platynopiellus septendecimmaculatus (Palisot de Beauvois, 1811) (synonymised by Schouteden 1905: 160, 162; see Schouteden 1907: 48, as P. rostratus . Due to homonymy (see “ Notes ” below), the name of the species became that of the next available junior synonym: Pentatoma 17-maculata Palisot de Beauvois, 1811 (see Kirkaldy 1909: 12, as Platynopus 17-maculatus); Thomas (1994: 195) placed it in his new genus, Platynopiellus .).
Notes: Compared to P. rostratus in the original description and said to be much smaller, later synonymised to it. And indeed, Distant’s syntype from Sierra Leone, was the first specimen listed by Dallas (1851: 87) under Platynopus rostratus .
The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature states: “A junior homonym [Art. 53] must be rejected and replaced either by an available and potentially valid synonym [Art. 23.3.5] or, for lack of such a name, by a new substitute name [Art. 60.3].” ( ICZN 1999, Art. 60.1.) and later: “Junior homonyms with synonyms. If the rejected junior homonym has one or more available and potentially valid synonyms, the oldest of these becomes the valid name of the taxon [Art. 23.3.5] with its own authorship and date.” ( ICZN 1999, Art. 60.2.). Schouteden (1905: 160, 162) had synonymised Platynopus parvus Distant, 1900 to P. rostratus ( Drury, 1782) . The latter, however, was a junior primary homonym to Cimex rostratus DeGeer, 1773 (Pentatomidae) as well as a primary homonym to C. rostratus Goeze, 1778 (Coreidae) and C. rostratus Fabricius, 1781 (Pentatomidae) ( Dolling et al. 1999: 77). The name rostratus Drury, 1782 needed thus to be rejected and replaced. The species Cimex rostratus Drury, 1782 had many synonyms. The oldest of these was Cimex calens Fabricius, 1803 . This, however, was a primary homonym to Cimex calens Linnaeus, 1767 (Miridae) ( Dolling et al. 1999: 18). The next synonym of Cimex rostratus was Pentatoma 17-maculata Palisot de Beauvois, 1811 and this was retained as the valid name of the species.
The specific epithet, originally spelled 17-maculata, has been transliterated in two different ways: septendecimaculata /- us ( Thomas 1994: 194-195; Maldès & Pluot-Sigwalt 2004) and septemdecimmaculatus ( Dolling et al. 1999: 18, 77; Rider 2015); we have adopted the spelling septendecimmaculata /- us as we have chosen to follow Welter-Schultes (2012: 76); the set of rules provided there is convenient and useful to achieve consistency in transliterating older names or naming new species.We note, however, that the use of “septemdecim” is not erroneous ( Gaffiot 1934: 1426), only less correct ( Lewis & Short 1891: 1675). Furthermore, bearing in mind the explanations by Lewis & Short (1891:1091), we also understand the choice not to duplicate the “m” as logical.
Thomas (1994: 195) mentioned having examined 151 African specimens (“ Material examined: Ghana (3), Zaire (6), Cameroon (140), Kenya (1), Uganda (1).”) but not the types .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Platynopus parvus
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
parvus (Platynopus)
Distant, W. L. 1900: 56 |