Campoplex tanae, Han & Achterberg & Chen, 2021
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B3D85E9-31FE-4D08-8E15-BA8959DD1988 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653973 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1-4711-6C47-9DD1-1DB30DE77D6D |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Campoplex tanae |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Campoplex tanae sp. nov.
Figs. 79–80 View FIGURE 79 View FIGURE 80
Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Foping, Liangfengya, 30.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli , No 201303440 ( ZJUH).
Description. Female ( Fig. 79 View FIGURE 79 ) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.2 mm.
Head. Antenna with at least 18 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face ( Fig. 80D View FIGURE 80 ) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus ( Fig. 80D View FIGURE 80 ) granulose, almost truncated apically. Malar space mat, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance ( Fig. 80E View FIGURE 80 ) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.
Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum ( Fig. 80F View FIGURE 80 ) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron ( Fig. 80B View FIGURE 80 ) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron ( Fig. 80B View FIGURE 80 ) granulose. Propodeum ( Fig. 80C View FIGURE 80 ) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; median carina weakly developed under costula, becoming stronger posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and round.
Wing. Fore wing ( Fig. 80A View FIGURE 80 ) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3.
Legs. Hind femur 4.2× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak basally.
Metasoma. First metasomal segment ( Fig. 80G View FIGURE 80 ) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite as long as first tergite, 2.0× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved.
Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs with trochanters, trochantellus and coxae apically yellow, coxae basally and apical tarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia subbasally and apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergite on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black.
Distribution. China (Shaanxi).
Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. manaliensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 , but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance equal to ocello-ocular distance, area petiolaris rugose, and scape and pedicel blackish brown.
Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Jiangli Tan, the collector of the holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.