Celaetycheus bobo, Polotow, Daniele & Brescovit, Antonio D., 2013
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3637.2.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B5343C3-0426-4014-9F12-E2346DDEEE08 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6148398 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/984B87B8-4170-FF98-FF00-D913FBF8D9A5 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Celaetycheus bobo |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Celaetycheus bobo View in CoL new species
Figures 9 View FIGURE 9. A – D , 14–15 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15
Type material. Male holotype from Uruçuca (Fazenda Santo Antonio) [14°35ʹ34ʺS, 39°17ʹ0 2ʺW], Bahia, Brazil, 24.X.1978, J.S. Santos, deposited in IBSP 163260. Paratypes: 1 male and 1 female, same data as the holotype, deposited in IBSP 163262 and 163261, respectively; 1 male from Uruçuca (Fazenda Santa Tereza) [14°35ʹ34ʺS, 39°17ʹ0 2ʺW], Bahia, Brazil, 3.II.1970, CEPLAC, deposited in MNRJ 13435; 1 female from Barro Preto (Fazenda Mangabeira) [14°48ʹ36ʺS, 39°28ʹ15ʺW], Bahia, Brazil, 12.VII.1968, CEPLAC, deposited in MNRJ 13380; 1 male from Barro Preto [14°48ʹ36ʺS, 39°28ʹ15ʺW], Bahia, Brazil, deposited in MNRJ.
Etymology. “ Bobó ” is a typical meal of the Bahia culinary tradition. It is prepared with shrimp, spices and puree of cassava, served with rice, dried shrimp, ginger and “dendê” palm oil.
Diagnosis. Males of Celaetycheus bobo sp. nov. ( Figs 9A–B View FIGURE 9. A – D ) resemble those of C. acaraje sp. nov. ( Figs 7A–B View FIGURE 7. A – D ) by the male palp with a straight median apophysis with ventral cup-shaped projection, but can be distinguished by the larger embolus and the large additional tegular projection ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9. A – D ). Females of C. bobo sp. nov. ( Figs 9C–D View FIGURE 9. A – D ) resemble those of C. caruru sp. nov. ( Figs 10C–D View FIGURE 10. A – D ) by the subtriangular shape of the median sector of epigynum, but can be distinguished by the longer median sector of epigynum ( Fig. 9C View FIGURE 9. A – D ).
Description. Male (holotype IBSP 163260). Total length 3.6. Carapace 2.1 long, 1.85 wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.12/ ALE 0.08/ PME 0.16/ PLE 0.16. Leg measurements: I: femur 2.2/ patella 0.8/ tibia 2.1/ metatarsus 2.2/ tarsus 1.1/ total 8.4; II: 2.2/ 0.8/ 1.9/ 2.1/ 1.0/ 8.0; III: 2.2/ 0.8/ 1.75/ 2.4/ 1.0/ 8.15; IV: 2.7/ 0.8/ 2.5/ 3.4/ 1.3/ 10.7. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: tibia I v2-2 -2-2-2, p1, r1-1, II v2-2 -2-2-2, p1-1-1-1, r1-1-1-1-1, III v2-2 -2, p1-1- 1, r1-1, IV v2-2 -2, p1-1, r1-1; metatarsus I–II v2-2 -2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, III v2-2 -2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, IV v2-1 -1-1-2, p1- 1-1, r1-1-1. Palpal femur with short proximal spines; coxa and trochanter of leg I with short and thick spines ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 A). Palp ( Figs 9A–B View FIGURE 9. A – D ): tibia straight, with almost the same length as the cymbium; retrolateral tibial apophysis short and coniform; ventral tibial projection large; retrolateral cymbial projection elongated, with truncated tip; laminar embolus with a large base.
Female (paratype IBSP 163261). Total length 4.7. Carapace 2.1 long, 1.8 wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.10/ ALE 0.08/ PME 0.16/ PLE 0.20. Leg measurements: I: femur 1.7/ patella 0.7/ tibia 1.6/ metatarsus1.4/ tarsus 0.7/ total 6.1; II: 1.6/ 0.8/ 1.9/ 1.4/ 0.7/ 6.4; III: 1.6/ 0.65/ 1.2/ 1.55/ 0.6/ 5.6; IV: 2.1/ 0.7/ 1.65/ 2.2/ 0.9/ 7.55. Leg formula 4213. Leg spination: tibia I–II v2-2 -2-2-2, p0, r0, III v1 p-2-2, p1-1, r1-1, IV v1 p-1p-2, p1-1, r1-1; metatarsus I–II v2-2 -2, p0, r0, III–IV v2-2 -2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Epigynum ( Figs 9C–D View FIGURE 9. A – D ): epigynal plate subtriangular, slightly narrowed in the anterior area; base of spermathecae small.
Distribution. Uruçuca e Barro Preto, State of Bahia, northeast Brazil ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.