Doris kerguelenensis, (Bergh, 1884)

Valdés, Ángel, 2002, A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136 (4), pp. 535-636 : 557-560

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00039.x

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5110267

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03927F0E-FFF9-6050-FF5B-F9766B8BD155

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Doris kerguelenensis
status

 

DORIS KERGUELENENSIS ( BERGH, 1884) View in CoL View at ENA

( FIGS 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12 )

Archidoris kerguelenensis Bergh, 1884b: 85–89 View in CoL , pl. 1, figs 1–12.

Archidoris australis Bergh, 1884b: 89–91 View in CoL , pl. 1, figs 13–18, pl. 2, fig. 13.

Archidoris rubescens Bergh 1898: 501–503 View in CoL , pl. 29, figs 17–20.

Austrodoris michaelseni Odhner, 1926: 68–71 View in CoL , pl. 2, figs 30-32, text figs 47-50.

Austrodoris crenulata Odhner, 1926: 75–76 View in CoL , pl. 2, figs 38, 39, text fig. 54.

Austrodoris macmurdensis Odhner, 1934: 260–263 View in CoL , pl. 2, figs 21–23, text figs 25-27.

Austrodoris tomentosa Odhner, 1934: 265–267 View in CoL , pl. 2, figs 19, 20, text fig. 32.

Austrodoris nivium Odhner, 1934: 267–269 View in CoL , pl. 2 figs 21–23, text figs 33-35.

Austrodoris mishu Marcus, 1985: 219–222 View in CoL , figs 1–12.

Austrodoris vicentei Marcus, 1985: 214 View in CoL , 217.

Austrodoris georgiensis García et al. 1993: 417–421 View in CoL , figs 1–8.

Type material

For a list of the extant type material of the nominal species included in the genus Austrodoris see Wägele (1990).

Additional material

North-west of Explorer’s Cove , New Harbor, west side of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, 17 December 1985, two specimens, 54–66 mm preserved length, leg. K. A. Miller ( CASIZ 087312 ) .

External morphology

The external morphology of this species has been described in detail by Wägele (1990). My specimens were preserved, so no data on the living animals are available.

The general colour of the living animals is uniformly white ( Wägele, 1990). The rhinophores and gill are also white. The whole dorsum is covered with rounded and simple tubercles varying in size and shape ( Fig. 11D View Figure 11 ). The largest tubercles are situated in the central region of the body. The rhinophoral and branchial sheath are surrounded by tubercles similar to the rest of the dorsal tubercles. There are 7–9 tripinnate branchial leaves, forming a circle. The anal papilla is prominent, situated in the centre of the branchial circle of leaves. The rhinophores are elongate, having 32 lamellae in a 66-mm preserved length specimen.

Ventrally there are no oral tentacles, but two blunt prolongations on each side of the mouth opening ( Fig. 12F View Figure 12 ). The anterior border of the foot is grooved but not notched.

Anatomy

The posterior end of the glandular portion of the oral tube has six strong retractor muscles ( Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ) which attach to the body wall. The oval, muscular buccal bulb has two additional muscles attached; two long and wide salivary glands connect with it at each side of the oesophageal junction. The buccal bulb is twice as long as the glandular portion of the oral tube. The labial cuticle is smooth. The radular formula is 24 ¥ 37.0. 37 in a 54-mm long specimen. Rachidian teeth are absent. The lateral teeth are narrow and elongate, having a single cusp and lacking denticles ( Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). The teeth from the middle portion of the half-row are larger than those closer to the medial portion of the radula ( Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ). The outermost teeth are smaller and also lack denticles ( Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ). The oesophagus is short and connects directly to the stomach ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ).

The ampulla is very long and convoluted. It branches into a short oviduct and the prostate ( Fig. 12B View Figure 12 ). The oviduct enters the female gland mass near to its centre. The prostate is tubular, very long and folded ( Fig. 12B View Figure 12 ). It connects with a long duct that narrows and expands again into the large ejaculatory portion of the deferent duct. The muscular deferent duct opens into a short common atrium with the vagina. The vagina is short and wide. Near to its proximal end it joins the bursa copulatrix and the seminal receptacle. The uterine duct also leads from this duct. The bursa copulatrix is irregular in shape, about as large as the seminal receptacle ( Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ).

In the central nervous system ( Fig. 12E View Figure 12 ) the cerebral and pleural ganglia are fused and distinct from the pedal ganglia. There are three cerebral nerves leading from each cerebral ganglion and three pleural nerves leading from each pleural ganglion. There is a separate abdominal ganglion on the right side of the visceral loop. This ganglion appears to have several distinctive portions and one of them seems to be the genital ganglion. The buccal ganglia are near to the rest of the central nervous system, joined to the cerebral ganglia by two relatively short nerves. Gastrooesophageal, rhinophoral and optical ganglia are present. The pedal ganglia are clearly separated, having three nerves leading from the left ganglion and two from the right one. The pedal and parapedal commissures are enveloped together with the visceral loop.

The circulatory system ( Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ) consists of a large heart and a single large blood gland situated in front of the central nervous system.

Remarks

Wägele (1990) revised the genus Austrodoris and concluded that all the Antarctic species previously assigned to it are synonyms of Austrodoris kerguelensis ( Bergh, 1884) . She also described in detail the anatomy and external morphology of this species.

More recently García et al. (1993) described the new species Austrodoris georgiensis , which is also a synonym of Austrodoris kerguelensis . García et al. (1993) based Austrodoris georgiensis on a single specimen collected from South Georgia, in the Atlantic Antarctic sector. The only difference between A. georgiensis and A. kerguelenensis is the presence of an elongate bursa copulatrix in the former. As other features of both nominal species (e.g. external morphology, radula, other reproductive organs), are identical, it is likely that the single specimen assigned to A. georgiensis is just an aberrant specimen of A. kerguelenensis . Another possibility is that the bursa copulatrix is more variable than assumed until now.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Mollusca

Class

Gastropoda

Order

Nudibranchia

Family

Dorididae

Genus

Doris

Loc

Doris kerguelenensis

Valdés, Ángel 2002
2002
Loc

Austrodoris georgiensis García et al. 1993: 417–421

Garcia FJ & Troncoso JS & Garcia-Gomez JC & Cervera JL 1993: 421
1993
Loc

Austrodoris mishu

Marcus Ev 1985: 222
1985
Loc

Austrodoris vicentei

Marcus Ev 1985: 214
1985
Loc

Austrodoris macmurdensis

Odhner N 1934: 263
1934
Loc

Austrodoris tomentosa

Odhner N 1934: 267
1934
Loc

Austrodoris nivium

Odhner N 1934: 269
1934
Loc

Austrodoris michaelseni

Odhner N 1926: 71
1926
Loc

Austrodoris crenulata

Odhner N 1926: 76
1926
Loc

Archidoris rubescens

Bergh R 1898: 503
1898
Loc

Archidoris kerguelenensis

Bergh R 1884: 89
1884
Loc

Archidoris australis

Bergh R 1884: 91
1884
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF