Liphanthus cochabambensis Mir Sharifi and Packer, 2019

Sharifi, Negar Mir, Graham, Liam & Packer, Laurence, 2019, Fifteen new species of Liphanthus Reed (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) with two submarginal cells, Zootaxa 4645 (1), pp. 1-80 : 34-38

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4645.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:01C0687D-D282-4E0C-8C3E-C2E70956C493

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A6521C9D-9DBF-4B45-9A8B-39AD8E807745

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:A6521C9D-9DBF-4B45-9A8B-39AD8E807745

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Liphanthus cochabambensis Mir Sharifi and Packer
status

sp. nov.

Liphanthus cochabambensis Mir Sharifi and Packer , sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A6521C9D-9DBF-4B45-9A8B-39AD8E807745

Figs. 68–78 View FIGURES 68–74 View FIGURES 75–78 , 152 View FIGURES 148–152 , 155–156 View FIGURES 153–156 , 159–160 View FIGURES 159–162 , 203–205 View FIGURES 201–204 View FIGURES205–206 .

Diagnosis: Males of this species can be differentiated from others of the genus except L. fritzi by the combination of two submarginal cells, pronotal lobe black, metatibial spurs straight, S7 apical lobe with dense apicomedially oriented hairs ( Fig. 72 View FIGURES 68–74 ). Males can be differentiated from L. fritzi by mesosoma moderately imbricate, somewhat shiny (as in Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75–78 ) as opposed to strongly imbricate and dull in L. fritzi and the degree of ventral recurvature of the clypeal apex, which forms an angle that is at most a right angle in L. cochabambensis ( Figs. 70 View FIGURES 68–74 & 153 View FIGURES 153–156 ) but clearly more than a right angle in L. fritzi ( Figs. 81 View FIGURES 79–85 & 151 View FIGURES 148–152 ). Females of this species can be differentiated from all others except L. amblayensis by the combination of two submarginal cells, pronotal lobe black, metatibial spurs straight and facial fovea more than 5.5 X as long as wide. Females can be differentiated from L. amblayensis by mesoscutum and scutellum almost devoid of microsculpture, shiny ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 75–78 ) as opposed to both with distinct but weak imbrication, somewhat shiny, in L. amblayensis ( Fig. 206 View FIGURES205–206 ).

Description: Holotype Male: Dimensions: approximate body length: 4.5mm; head width: 1.3mm, wing length: 3.05mm, intertegular width: 0.72mm.

Coloration: Black to dark brown with following parts yellow: mandible outer ridge and subapically (apex red, rest dark brown), clypeus (except extreme base and extreme lateral portion brown). Ventral surface of flagellum and pronotal lobe dark red-brown. Tegula and apical impressed areas of metasomal terga translucent dark orange-brown. All femora with small apicodorsal orange-brown mark. All tarsomeres except basitarsi dark orange-brown.

Sculpture: Face moderately imbricate, somewhat shiny; clypeus with scattered weak punctures impunctate except yellow portion irregularly punctate, i=0.5–4d; lower paraocular area punctures irregularly spaced, i=0.2–3d; subantennal sclerite punctures shallow, irregularly spaced, i≤d; supraclypeal area with small punctures, i=0.5–3d; upper paraocular and frontal areas densely and deeply punctate, i<0.3d; vertexal area more sparsely punctate i<d; genal and hypostomal areas weakly imbricate, shiny; genal area minutely punctate,i≤2d; hypostomal area punc- tures almost imperceptible, sparse. Mesoscutum very weakly imbricate shiny except dull due to crowded punctures anteriorly, elsewhere more sparsely punctate i<d; scutellum very weakly imbricate, shiny, punctures larger and irregularly spaced, i≤2d; metanotum imbricate, punctures shallow, dense, i<d; metapostnotum dorsal surface with longitudinal striae, most approaching posterior margin; mesopleuron coarsely imbricate, punctures shallow, dense, i<d above, absent below; metapleuron weakly imbricate, shiny, impunctate; propodeum coarsely imbricate laterally, weakly imbricate dorsally, moderately imbricate posteriorly. Metasomal terga generally lacking imbrication, shiny; T1 horizontal portion punctures small, i=1–3d; T2–T3 punctures smaller, i=1–2d; T4 punctures minute, i=1–3d; (T5 hidden by T4), T6 punctures large, irregularly spaced, i=0.2–4d; T7 lacking pygidial plate; apical impressed areas minutely and densely punctate on T1, apical impressed areas of T2–T6 increasingly weakly imbricate. Metasomal sterna weakly imbricate, somewhat shiny; with scattered shallow punctures.

Pubescence: Generally white, sparse and with short branches; longest on apical margin of clypeus apicomedially, ≤2.5 MOD, ≤2 MOD on pronotum, anterior margin of mesoscutum, posterior margin of scutellum, metanotum laterally. Somewhat plumose, short ≤0.5 MOD along admedian line and laterally on dorsal surface of metapostno- tum. Metasoma with minute sparse hairs except long on anterior declivitous surface and towards sides of T1, and at junction of disc and apical impressed area of T4–T6 <1 MOD, except thick and ≤1.5 MOD on T6. Sterna with minute hairs except S5 with sparse subapical fringe of pale brown hairs <1 MOD.

Structure: Head: ~1.2 X as wide as long (89:75). Mandible ~3.4 X as long as basal depth (54:16). Labrum rectangular, 1.7 X as broad as long (33:19). Clypeus less than twice as wide as long (50:28) apicolateral margin slightly convex in frontal view, apicomedial margin straight. Inner subantennal suture sinuate, weakly outwardly convex above, strongly outwardly concave below, outer subantennal suture weakly sinuate, subantennal sclerite wider below midlength; epistomal suture straight between inner subantennal sutures. Anterior tentorial pit just below junction of outer subantennal and epistomal sutures. Frontal line raised below, narrowly impressed around midlength. IAD= AOD (14:14). Inner margin of compound eyes strongly convergent below, UOD:LOD 84:56. Facial fovea narrowly oval, length to width: 11:3, strongly converging towards compound eye below. IOC approximately one half OOC 15:28. Scape 2X as long as greatest width (24:12), longer than pedicel and F1 combined (22); pedicel as long as wide (9:9), F1 longer than wide (13:8); F2 length subequal to width (7:8), remaining flagellomeres wider than long except F11 1.5 X as long as wide (15:10).

Mesosoma: Mesoscutum 1.1 X as wide as long (72:64); length of scutellum: metanotum: metapostnotum: 24:12:11. Marginal cell length shorter than distance between its apex to wing tip (44:48). metatibial spurs straight, posterior one longer than anterior spur. Pro-, meso- and anterior metatarsal claws narrowly cleft, posterior metatarsal claw with thin broadly truncate tooth.

Metasoma. Broadest at apical impressed area of T2; terga not strongly ventromedially reflexed towards sides; pygidial plate absent; S1–S5 unmodified; S6 apex angularly concave, somewhat greater than a right angle, resulting lateral lobes densely punctate, i<1.5d, bearing apicomedially oriented hairs. S7. Apodemes moderately long and broad, anterior margin forming obtuse angle, strongly sinuate; apical lobe short, basal width greater than medial length, robust, apex weakly concave with long dense medially oriented hairs, hairs almost as long as apical width of lobe. S8. Anterior margin strongly concave, anterior portion long (~1.5X greatest width), lateral margins weakly diverging anteriorly; lateral lobe large, broadly rounded; apical lobe narrowly rounded, lateral margin sinuate, short hair posteriorly, short spicules on apical half of dorsal surface. Gonocoxa anterodorsally weakly convex, narrowed subapically, lateral margins slightly convex towards base, convergent towards base of gonostylus, medial margins approximately straight; gonostylus fused to gonocoxa, short, as long as wide, base slightly narrower than obliquely truncate apex, with long, dense posteriorly oriented hairs, longest medially; penis valve moderately broad, sinuate towards narrow apex, with posterolaterally oriented hairs. Endophallus not elaborated.

Allotype Female: As in male except for usual sexually dimorphic features and as follows:

Dimensions: Approximate body length: 5.31mm; head width: 1.79mm, wing length not measurable due to degree of apical fraying, intertegular width: 1.08mm.

Coloration: Black to dark brown except: mandible orange (except basal half brown and apex black), F5–F10 red-brown ventrally, tegula orange-brown, pygidial plate orange basally, darkening to dark brown apically.

Sculpture: Clypeus punctures i=1–2d; mesosoma weakly imbricate, shiny; mesopleuron punctures large, shallow ventrally, moderately sparse, i=1.5–2d, sparsely punctate elsewhere, i>2d. T1 punctures small, moderately dense on disc, i=1–1.5d;T2 punctures smaller, moderately sparse, i=1.5–2d; T3–T4 weakly imbricate with minute scattered punctures; T5 moderately densely and coarsely punctate, i=0.5–1.5d; apical impressed areas weakly imbricate; posterior areas of S1–S4 moderately densely to moderately sparsely punctate, i=1–4d,.

Pubescence: Longest on tibial scopa ~2.5 MOD; apical margin of clypeus ~2 MOD; ~1 MOD on vertexal area. Sides of T6 and prepygidial fimbria hairs dense, branched, ~1.5 MOD; < MOD posteriorly on S1–S6.

Structure: Head: 1.25 X as wide as long (70:56). Mandible ~ 2.7 X longer than basal depth (72:27). Labrum rectangular, more than 1.5 X as broad as long (45:28). Clypeus 2.5 X as wide as long (92:38). IAD<AOD (21:26). Anterior tentorial pit at junction of weak outer subantennal suture and epistomal suture. Compound eyes convergent below, UOD:LOD 67:62. Facial fovea deep, parallel-sided, long, length to width: 31:5. IOC < OOC 20:31. Scape 2.7 X as long as greatest width (35:13), longer than pedicel and F1 combined (24); pedicel length subequal to width (11:10), F1~1.5 X as long as wide (13:9), F2 shorter than wide (7:11), remaining flagellomeres slightly shorter than wide except F10 1.6 X as long as wide (21:13).

Mesosoma: Mesoscutum ~ 1.3 X as wide as long (49:37); length of scutellum: metanotum: metapostnotum: 35:18:20. Pro- and mesotarsal claw teeth long [apical metatarsomeres missing on only female known].

Metasoma: Pygidial plate triangular, sides straight, forming angle of ~60°, narrowly raised medially.

Material studied. Holotype male, allotype female and one paratype male. Holotype and allotype as follows: BOLIVIA, Cochabamba: Pena Colorada , 1800 m, 21.ii.1976, L. E. Pena. Both specimens are at the AMNH . Paratype male: BOLIVIA, Cochabamba: Rio Mizque , 2100m., Sept. 2, 1976, L.E. Peña .

Etymology. The species is named after the type locality.

Comments. Like the previous species, when treated as having three submarginal cells, males of L. cochabambensis also fail at couplet 10 which contrasts different forms of process on S2 and this species has no such process. The female fails at couplet 33 as it is not smooth and shiny above the antennal sockets (required to go to couplet 34) and lacks a yellow marking on the pronotal lobe (required to go to couplet 35).

This species belongs to the same species group as the one previous and the two following.

MOD

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Biology

IOC

Colecao de Culturas de Fungos do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Andrenidae

Genus

Liphanthus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF