Lysiosquilloidea, Erichthus

Steck, Mireille, Winnicki, Elizabeth, Kobayashi, Donald R., Whitney, Jonathan L., Ahyong, Shane T. & Porter, Megan L., 2022, Hawaiian larval stomatopods: molecular and morphological diversity, Zootaxa 5214 (2), pp. 235-260 : 244-246

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5214.2.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C681A96-D016-496C-8757-A43E8B709790

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7386434

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0F4887FD-FFA7-FFFA-FF09-C318901DFE09

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Lysiosquilloidea
status

 

Lysiosquilloidea View in CoL View at ENA

Lysiosquilloid larvae could be separated from other erichthus-type larvae by the presence of sub-quadrate shaped maxillipeds, a distinguishing trait in adult lysiosquilloid stomatopods as well.Another obvious trait of the lysiosquilloid larvae was the deeper, and bulkier carapace than most other groups. In most subtypes (with the exception of the Rockets), the body of the animal could curl to fit snugly into the carapace, forming a defensive ball ( Figure 5E View FIGURE 5 ). Only three lysiosquilloid species have been previously documented in the Hawaiian Islands: Lysiosquilla maculata , Acanthosquilla multifasciata (Wood-Mason, 1895) , and Heterosquilloides insignis (Kemp, 1911) ( Ahyong 2002a) . Based on barcoding, we identified six lysiosquilloid OTUs from Hawaiian waters, indicating a higher diversity than previously estimated. It is unlikely the higher diversity is a result of new colonization events, and more likely an absence of adult documentation due to the cryptic and burrowing nature of Lysiosquilloidea species ( Caldwell 1988). Because of the difficulty in collecting adult Lysiosquilloidea , there is little barcoding data available for species in this superfamily. Only two OTUs were identified to species: L. maculata and Pullosquilla n. sp. ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).

The six molecular OTUs were sequenced from five distinct erichthus-type subtypes and two individual antizoea (not morphologically characterized here). Morphological differences observed among the lysiosquilloid larvae were primarily related to the carapace shape and length in comparison to the abdominal somites, and telson features ( Table 4 View TABLE 4 ). Adults of this superfamily occur in intertidal to upper slope habitats where they burrow in sand and sandy-mud ( Ahyong 2001). Adults may be found in simple sand and mud flats as well as in sandy habitats associated with reefs. Larvae were found similarly across a range of pelagic habitats, occurring both in nearshore shallow plankton tows (0–10 m), and in our deepest reef pelagic trawls (650–973 m). While the lowest number of individual lysiosquilloid larvae were found, the number of morphotypes were the second highest among the superfamilies (second only to the gonodactyloids).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF