Patagongidiella Grosso & Fernández, 1993
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3694.2.8 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59C9143D-FB0F-4129-AA38-F0A444C1E72D |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5673277 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2159F878-FFB0-FF83-FF2A-9ECBFB02FE45 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Patagongidiella Grosso & Fernández, 1993 |
| status |
|
Genus Patagongidiella Grosso & Fernández, 1993 View in CoL
Patagongidiella Grosso & Fernández, 1993: 340 ; Koenemann & Holsinger, 1999: 793
Diagnosis (amended from Koenemann & Holsinger 1999). Peduncle of male uropod 1 with modified, hypertrophied facial robust seta. 2nd article of exopodite of male pleopod 2 with modified distolateral seta; sternal humps (“large mediosternal processes”) on pereonites 2-5 or 4-6.
Species included. Two species, Patagongidiella danieli Grosso & Fernández, 1993 (type species); Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. (described herein).
Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )
Type specimens. Holotype: undissected female (MZUC Nº 39633) 4.45 mm, Ñadi Pichidamas, Puyehue, Osorno, Región de Los Lagos, 40°40’34.9’’S, 72°50’54.37’’W, 20-II-2011, Col. J. Pérez, Vertiente. Allotype: partially dissected male (MZUC Nº 39634) 4.45 mm, data as holotype except date: 2-IV-2010 dissected parts mounted in a slide. Paratypes: 3 undissected females (JPS-226) 3.54–3.76 mm, same data as holotype. 1 dissected female (JPS- 228) 3.70 mm, same data as holotype, dissected parts mounted in two slides. 1 undissected female (MZUC Nº 39635) 3.86 mm, same data as holotype except date: 21-III-2010. 1 undissected female (MZUC Nº 39636) 3.13 mm, same data as holotype except date: 2-IV-2010. 1 undissected male (MZUC Nº 39637) 3.11 mm, Pichidamas, Osorno, Región de Los Lagos, 40°44’S, 72°48’W, 11-X-2010, Col. J. Pérez & G. Ojeda, Vertiente vado.
Type locality. Ñadi Pichidamas (40°40’34.9’’S, 72°50’54.37’’W), Puyehue, Osorno, Middle depression of Los Lagos Region ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). In a small spring draining to Quebrada Honda river, upper portion of the Damas basin.
Diagnosis. Patagongidiella with hypertrophied facial robust seta on peduncle of male uropod 1 provided with a convex blunt tip and with short setules subdistally on medioventral margin and on dorsomedial margin of cap. Modified seta directed laterodorsally on exopod of male pleopod 2. Sternal humps (blisters) present on pereonites 4-6.
Description. Female: Total length: 3.13–4.45 mm (mean: 3.73 mm). Head: eyes absent; Antennula ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : A1): about 17% longer than antenna; relative length of peduncular segments 1–3 as 1:0.7:0.4; peduncle segments progressively shorter towards distal; flagellum longer than peduncle, 12-articulate, each article with distolateral slender setae and with single aesthetasc present on articles 5–8 and 10–11. Accessory flagellum 3-articulate, reaching third article of main flagellum. Antenna ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : A2): shorter than antennula, attaining 85% of antennular length; gland cone slightly shorter than peduncular segment 3; peduncular segment 4 slightly longer than segment 5, ratio as 1:0.9; peduncle and flagellum provided with distal slender setae; flagellum 6-articulate, length ratio of articles as 1:0.68:0.65:0.53:0.48:0.25; all articles longer than wide ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : A1 and A2). Labrum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : La): hexagonal, wide.
Right mandible ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : rM): incisor 2-denticulate, main distal denticle with a medial cutting edge provided with two small cusps; lacinia mobilis 6-denticulate, hand-shaped; spine row reduced to single, wide cutting raker; molar strong, triturative; palp segments 1:2:3 length ratio as 1:2.37:1.62, segment 2 anterior margin swollen, segment 3 with two D-setae and two E-setae. Left mandible ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : lM): incisor with six teeth separated in two discernible groups, two pappose rakers; lacinia mobilis 4-denticulate, proximal denticle subcuadrate. Paragnaths ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : Pa): internal lobes barely discernible; outer lobes covered distally with short setules. Maxillule ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : M1): palp 2-segmented, segment 2 longest with three distal setae; basal endite with 7 distal comb-like or bifurcate robust setae; coxal endite with three apical plumose setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : M2): endites distally with rows of long simple setae, inner lobe with seven distal setae plus two and slightly larger subdistal setae on medial margin. Maxilliped ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : Mp) basal endite with two short robust and four simple setae; ischial endite with three robust and six simple setae; palp developed, carpal segment longest, elongate and wide, with a cluster of long simple setae along anterior margin; propodus with a posterodistal comb row of closely-set blunt denticles.
Gnathopod 1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Gn1): coxa wider than long, with anteroventral angle slightly produced ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx1); basis with seven long setae on posterior margin; merus with patch of short spinules on posterior margin; carpus subtriangular, shorter than propodus, with posterior margin produced into well defined posterior lobe; posterodistal margin of lobe covered with patch of short spinules; propodus oblong ovoid, posterior margin slightly convex, palm margin oblique, about as long as posterior margin, straight, with marginal row of five short flagellate robust setae; palm angle with single robust seta similar to those lining palm margin. Gnathopod 2 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Gn2): longer and more slender than Gn1; coxa wider than long, with rounded anterior margin ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx2); basis with nine long setae on posterior margin; merus with one subdistal seta on posterior margin; carpus subtriangular elongated, but shorter than propodus, with three groups of long single setae and patch of short spinules on posterior margin; propodus oblong, palm oblique, about 2/5 length of posterior margin, straight, defined by two unequal flagellate robust setae, palm margin crenulate as in Gn1, with two flagellate robust setae.
Pereopods 3 – 4: subequal ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : P3 and P4), not sexually dimorphic; coxa 3 slightly longer than wide, with anterior margin evenly rounded ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx3), coxa 4 subquadrate, with posterior margin not excavated ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx4); basis of both limbs swollen with strong setae along both margins. Pereopod 5 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : P5): coxa wider than long, with broad, evenly rounded anteroventral lobe ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx5); basis suboval, posterodistal lobe wanting. Pereopod 6 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : P6): longer than pereopod 5, basis suboval, merus longer than carpus; coxa with posteroventral lobe not so produced and more slender than in coxa 5 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx6). Pereopod 7 ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : P7): longer but similar to pereopod 6, merus shorter than carpus; coxa triangular, wider than long ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : Cx7).
Epimeral plates ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : Ep): postero-ventral angle rectangular, with tip slightly produced, one very small seta on posteroventral margin of epimera 1–2. Pleopods ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : Pl1 to Pl3): peduncle with two mediodistal coupling hooks, endopodite reduced, uniarticulate, reaching third article of exopodite in pleopod 1 and second article in pleopods 2 and 3; exopodite with 4 articles in pleopod 1 and 3 articles in pleopods 2 and 3. Uropod 1 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : aU 1v): peduncle with a proximo-ventrolateral (= facial) strong robust seta, rami slightly shorter than peduncle, exopodite slightly shorter than endopodite ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : U1); uropod 2 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : U2): shorter than uropod 1, rami longer than peduncle, exopodite slightly shorter than endopodite; uropod 3 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : U3): longest, rami 2.5 times longer than peduncle, endopodite uniarticulate, nearly as long as exopodite; endo and exopodite lined with short robust setae. Telson ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : aT): subrectangular, longer than wide, distal margin slightly emarginated; with two distal, two subdistal and two dorsolateral robust setae. Coxal gills ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : C4 to C6): on pereopods 4 to 6. Sternal gills absent. Sternal humps (blisters) ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 : Sh): present on sternites 4 to 6, sternites 3 and 7 strongly bulging but not forming a blister. Oostegites ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 : O2 and O3): present on coxae 2–5, narrow and devoid of setae.
Male: Total length: 3.11–4.45 mm (mean: 3.78 mm). As the female except for: Pleopod 2 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : bPl2): exopodite with a special seta inserted laterally on second article, dorsolaterally directed and 1/3 longer than ramus itself; dorsal (lateral) margin and apex of seta lined with short setules; third article reduced and laterally directed, provided with an ordinary distal and a distolateral atrophied seta. Uropod 1 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : bU1): facial seta on peduncle hypertrophied and convoluted distally, running along lateral margin of peduncle until half of uropodal rami; distal half of lateral surface of seta finely striated, distalmost portion flattened and coiled, with inner-ventral margin lined with faint setules; apex recurved, blunt, provided with shorter setules as figured ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 : bU1, detail). One of the distal strong setae on exopod nearly as long as half ramus length.
Etymology. The new species is named for “wefko”, that means “spring” or “fresh water” in Mapudungun, the language of the Mapuche, in allusion to the habitat where the studied specimens were found.
Ecological observations. Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. inhabits small running freshwater springs at 80–85 km from the sea and 120–150 m above sea level, in the Middle Depression of Osorno Province, Los Lagos Region, Chile. The animals were collected in highly impacted zones (agricultural and livestock rearing areas).
Accompanying Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. we found an undescribed species of protojanirid isopod, and occasionally the amphipod Hyalella chiloensis Gónzalez & Watling, 2001 .
Discussion
The genus Patagongidiella Grosso & Fernández, 1993 originally embraced two species, P. mauryi Grosso & Fernández, 1993 and P. danieli Grosso & Fernández, 1993 , both from the same cave system in Neuquén, Argentina (Grosso & Fernández 1993). Patagongidiella danieli was incompletely described and was considered to be nearly indistinguishable from P. mauryi except for the display of sexual dimorphism on pleopod 2 and uropod 1 (Grosso & Fernández 1993). However, Koenemann & Holsinger (1999) considered these characters to be sufficiently important as to allocate both species in different genera, and transferred P. mauryi to the new genus Grossogidiella Koenemann & Holsinger, 1999 . Since the only species of Patagongidiella is incompletely described, here I compare Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. with Grossogidiella mauryi (Grosso & Fernández, 1993) for the general morphology, and with Patagongidiella danieli Grosso & Fernández, 1993 for the sexually dimorphic characters ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).
The new species presents sternal humps developed only on the sternites 4 to 6 (versus 4–7 in the rest of species). However, the third and seventh sternites have a strongly bulging surface, suggesting a rudimental sternal hump.
Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. obviously differs from Grossogidiella mauryi in the display of sexually dimorphic pleopod 2 and uropod 1; other relevant differences between both taxa (that probably also hold for Patagongidiella danieli ) include the 12-articulate flagellum of antenna 1 (versus flagellum 16-articulate in G. mauryi ); the basal endite of the maxilliped bears two strong distal setae (versus three in G. mauryi ); the mandibular palp has two E-setae and two D-setae (versus three E-setae and three D-setae); and the basis of pereopod 3–4 is slightly widened and the telson is distally emarginated (versus convex).
The structure of the male pleopod 2 and uropod 1 are diagnostic in the differentiation of both species of Patagongidiella . The special seta present on the second article of the exopodite of pleopod 2 is laterally inserted and laterodorsally directed in P. wefkoi n. sp., in contrast to its normally inserted, distally directed position in P. danieli .
Moreover, the peduncular hypertrophied facial seta on male uropod 1 of both species differs in general structure and ornamentation. In P. wefkoi n. sp. the distal third of this seta is flattened and coiled, and is lined only with straight setules. In P. danieli the facial seta is not coiled and has an anteriorly directed bifid spike, whereas its ornamentation includes two types of setules arranged in two groups, one comprises smaller and more slender setules conforming a subdistal crown, whereas the setules of the second group are stronger and are associated to the spike.
The presence of Patagongidiella in southern Chile could give some clues on the origin of the genus. The Andean Cordillera represents an important barrier for the establishment of groundwater connections, because the impermeability of consolidated rock beds, high volcanism activity and gravity-driven divergent flows originating from the high elevations (Gleeson & Manning 2008). All this factors could have contributed to the isolation of eastern and western populations of Patagongidiella , and in accord with the geologic history of the Southern Andean Cordillera this process could have begun shortly before the principal uplift of the mountain system, which is estimated to have occurred between 14 and 10 million years ago (Thomson et al. 2001; Adriasola et al. 2006).
Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. is the first bogidiellid described from Chile; however, it is highly probable that there are several additional species waiting to be discovered in the country, which certainly could provide better insights on the role of the Andean cordillera in the evolution of South American Bogidiellid fauna.
TABLE 1. Comparison of Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp., with related species. Character states for Patagongidiella danieli assumed to be as in Grossogidiella mauryi except for pleopod 2 and uropod 1 (see discussion).
| Patagongidiella wefkoi n. sp. | Patagongidiella danieli Grosso & Fernández, 1993 | Grossogidiella mauryi (Grosso & Fernández, 1993) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagellar articles of Antenna | 12 | 16 | 16 |
| Distal robust setae on maxillipedal basal endite | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Setae on mandibular palp segment 3 | 2 E-setae/ 2 D-setae | 3 E-setae/ 3 D-setae | 3 E-setae/ 3 D-setae |
| Modified seta of male pleopod 2 | inserted laterally and laterodorsally directed | Normally inserted, distally directed | Absent |
| Distal third of hypertrophied facial robust seta on peduncle of male uropod 1 | Flattened and coiled, with only one type of setules | Not coiled, with anteriorly directed bifid spike and two types of ornamental setules | Absent |
| Telson distal margin | Slightly emarginated | Convex | Convex |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.