Myrmetes paykulli Kanaar, 1979
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4272127 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4342043 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0385915E-FF08-098B-60F4-FF3CCDB4F9AD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Myrmetes paykulli Kanaar, 1979 |
status |
|
Myrmetes paykulli Kanaar, 1979 View in CoL
( Figs. 11 View Figs , 61 View Figs , 95 View Figs , 126 View Figs , 160–161 View Figs , 491–507 View Figs View Figs )
Hister piceus: PAYKULL (1809) View in CoL : 231, nec MARSHAM (1802): 97 (misidentification).
Saprinus piceus: ERICHSON (1839) View in CoL : 676; MARSEUL (1855): 505, t. XIX, Fig. 122 View Figs .
Gnathoncus piceus : JACQUELIN- DUVAL (1858): 112.
Myrmetes piceus: MARSEUL (1862) :515, t. XIII, Figs.1, 1a; THOMSON (1862): 243 View Fig ; SCHMIDT (1885a): 318; GANGLBAUER (1899): 378; REITTER (1909): 290, t. 67, Fig. 4 View Fig ; BICKHARDT (1916 –1917): t. IV, Fig. 35 View Figs ; REICHARDT (1941): 172, Fig. 82 View Figs ; HORION (1949): 346; MAZUR (1973): 41, Fig. 88 View Figs ; KRYZHANOVSKIJ & REICHARDT (1976): 122, Fig. 164 View Figs .
Myrmetes paykulli Kanaar, 1979: 24 View in CoL . New substitute name for Hister piceus Paykull, 1809 View in CoL , nec Marsham, 1802).
Myrmetes paykulli View in CoL : VIENNA (1980): 113, Fig. 42 View Figs ; MAZUR & KASZAB (1980): 63, Fig. 32 View Figs ; MAZUR (1981a): 94, Fig. 128 View Figs ; MAZUR (1984): 107; MAZUR (1997): 217; YÉLAMOS (2002): 254, Figs. 122D, 128 View Figs ; MAZUR (2004): 95.
Note. Sensory structures of the antennal club were studied by DE MARZO & VIENNA (1982a).
Type locality. Sweden, near Uppsala.
Material examined. CZECH REPUBLIC: BOHEMIA: Liberec, Ruprechtice , xii.1997, nest of Formica rufa , 1 ♁, M. Švarc lgt .; Horní Jelení, 19.x.2001, 1 ♁, V. Zieris lgt. MORAVIA: Hnanice env., Na Fládnici , 30.iv.2003, 1 spec., Jiří Hájek lgt .; Srbce env., 28.xi.2001, 1 spec., V. Zieris lgt. ( TLAN) .
Redescription. Body length: PEL: 1.70–1.775 mm; APW: 0.525 –0.625 mm; PPW: 1.375 – 1.425 mm; EL: 1.175–1.25 mm; EW: 1.575 –1.675 mm.
Body ( Figs. 491–492 View Figs ) shortly oval, rounded, dorsally moderately convex, flattened ventrally, cuticle reddish-brown to dark brown with silk metallic luster; legs, mouthparts and antennae reddish.
Antennal scape ( Fig. 495 View Figs ) slender, surface imbricate, with few short setae, club ( Fig. 493 View Figs ) elongated, flattened, without visible articulation, entire surface with dense short sensilla intermingled with sparse somewhat longer erect sensilla; sensory structures of antennal club ( Fig. 11 View Figs ) in form of four rather small round circular sensory areas on ventral side and one large round vesicle on internal distal margin of ventral side.
Mouthparts. Mandibles ( Fig. 95 View Figs ) with curved outer margin, acutely pointed; sub-apical tooth on inner margin of left mandible minute; disc of labrum ( Fig. 61 View Figs ) imbricate, flattened; labral pits tiny, single weakly sclerotized seta present in each pit; labral fold significantly less developed; terminal labial palpomere thickened, its width about half its length; mentum sub-trapezoid, anterior angles ( Fig. 126 View Figs ) somewhat produced; anterior margin shallowly emarginate, with sparse, moderately long setae; lateral margins with one row of short ramose setae; disc of mentum glabrous; cardo of maxilla on lateral margin with few short setae; stipes triangular, with three short weakly sclerotized setae; terminal maxillary palpomere elongated, its width about one third its length, about three times as long as penultimate.
Clypeus ( Fig. 494 View Figs ) rectangularly rounded laterally, imbricate-punctate; frontal and supraorbital striae absent; frontal disc ( Fig. 495 View Figs ) microscopically imbricate-punctate; eyes flattened, visible from above.
Pronotum ( Fig. 491 View Figs ) transverse, about twice as broad as long; pronotal sides strongly narrowed anteriorly; apical angles conspicuous; marginal pronotal stria weakly impressed but complete; pronotal disc smooth; pronotal hypomeron glabrous; scutellum extremely small.
Elytral epipleura finely imbricate-punctate; marginal epipleural stria weakly impressed, complete; marginal elytral stria well impressed, slightly carinate, continued as shortened apical elytral stria, next obliterated; humeral elytral stria weakly impressed on basal fourth; inner subhumeral stria well impressed, carinate and almost complete, abbreviated on apical sixth; elytral disc with four thin dorsal elytral striae 1–4, abbreviated basally, apically surpassing half of elytral length, fourth dorsal elytral stria slightly shortened apically, sutural elytral stria absent; elytral disc microscopically punctate, punctation becomes more prominent in postero-lateral corners.
Propygidium almost completely exposed, with lateral depressions, imbricate-punctate, punctures separated by about their own diameter; pygidium likewise imbricate-punctate, punctures becoming sparser medio-apically.
Anterior margin of median portion of prosternum ( Fig. 496 View Figs ) rounded, pre-apical foveae absent; prosternal process flat, substrigulate; carinal prosternal striae narrowing anteriorly; lateral prosternal striae carinate, narrowing anteriorly; both sets of striae apically attaining anterior margin of prosternal process.
Anterior margin of mesoventrite deeply emarginate medially; discal marginal mesoventral stria anteriorly carinate, weakened laterally; disc of mesoventrite transverse, smooth; mesometaventral sutural stria absent. Intercoxal disc of metaventrite slightly convex, smooth; lateral metaventral stria weakly impressed, obliquely arcuate, shortened; lateral disc of metaventrite ( Fig. 497 View Figs ) concave, imbricate-punctate; metepisternum + fused metepimeron ( Fig. 497 View Figs ) likewise imbricate-punctate, but punctation coarser and denser.
Intercoxal disc of the first abdominal sternite laterally depressed, completely striate laterally; imbricate-punctate.
Protibia ( Figs. 499–500 View Figs ) slender, flattened, outer margin with sparse row of short thin denticles; setae of outer row extremely short and sparse; setae of median row similarly short and sparse, irregular; protarsal groove absent; anterior protibial stria inconspicuous; two thin short tarsal denticles present apically; protibial spur large, bent, growing out from apical protibial margin; apical margin of protibia posteriorly with two tiny apical denticles; outer part of posterior surface of protibia ( Fig. 500 View Figs ) imbricate, with two scattered irregular rows of microscopic sclerotized setae; delimitation from median part of posterior surface vague; posterior protibial stria complete, with rather dense sclerotized setae that become thicker towards apical margin; inner margin with double row of short setae.
Mesotibia ( Figs. 160–161 View Figs ) slender, outer margin with a single row of sparse thin denticles growing in size apically; setae of outer row extremely short and minute; setae of median row inconspicuous; posterior mesotibial stria inconspicuous; anterior surface of mesotibia imbricate, with two rows of well sclerotized short setae; anterior mesotibial stria complete, terminating in single tiny inner anterior denticle; mesotibial spur stout, short; apical margin with two tiny denticles; mesotarsus shorter than mesotibia; claws of apical tarsomere longer than half its length; metatibia ( Fig. 498 View Figs ) basically similar to mesotibia, but denticles of outer margin almost absent, only near tarsal insertion two minute denticles present; claws of apical tarsomere about half its length.
Male genitalia. Eighth sternite ( Figs. 501–502 View Figs ) not fused medially, vela without setae; eighth tergite and eighth sternite not fused laterally ( Fig. 503 View Figs ). Ninth tergite ( Figs. 504–505 View Figs ) longitudinally divided medially, tenth tergite ( Fig. 504 View Figs ) with two moderately long thin setae (styli?); spiculum gastrale ( Fig. 504 View Figs ) expanded on both ends. Aedeagus ( Figs. 506–507 View Figs ) slender, conspicuously long, approximately 1.5 times as long as 8 th sternite; basal piece of aedeagus short, ratio of its length: length of parameres 1: 6; parameres fused along their basal three-fourths; aedeagus apically slightly curved ventrad ( Fig. 507 View Figs ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Myrmetes paykulli Kanaar, 1979
Lackner, Tomáš 2010 |
Myrmetes paykulli
MAZUR S. 2004: 95 |
YELAMOS T. 2002: 254 |
MAZUR S. 1997: 217 |
MAZUR S. 1984: 107 |
MAZUR S. 1981: 94 |
VIENNA P. 1980: 113 |
MAZUR S. & KASZAB Z. 1980: 63 |
Myrmetes paykulli
KANAAR P. 1979: 24 |
Myrmetes piceus:
KRYZHANOVSKIJ O. L. & REICHARDT A. N. 1976: 122 |
MAZUR S. 1973: 41 |
HORION A. 1949: 346 |
REICHARDT A. 1941: 172 |
REITTER E. 1909: 290 |
GANGLBAUER L. 1899: 378 |
SCHMIDT J. 1885: 318 |
MARSEUL S. A. 1862: 515 |
THOMSON C. P. 1862: 243 |
Saprinus piceus:
MARSEUL S. A. 1855: 505 |
ERICHSON W. F. 1839: 676 |
Hister piceus: PAYKULL (1809)
PAYKULL G. 1809: 231 |
MARSHAM T. 1802: 97 |