Chthonius C.L. Koch, 1843

Zaragoza, Juan A., 2017, Revision of the Ephippiochthonius complex in the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and Macaronesia, with proposed changes to the status of the Chthonius subgenera (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae), Zootaxa 4246 (1), pp. 1-221 : 20-21

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.437611

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8594E96-D561-4A37-9073-B138EC7E95A7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5687022

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03889E18-FFAC-5502-FF5C-42CFFEF6FC3D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chthonius C.L. Koch, 1843
status

 

Genus Chthonius C.L. Koch, 1843 View in CoL

Diagnosis. Chelal hand with fusiform shape, constricted between trichobothria ib / isb and base of fixed finger ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 – 9 ); bases of chelal fingers without sclerotized condylar complex; without medial protuberance (ip) between chelal condyles; hand without distoventral hollow; base of hand abruptly constricted paraxially; proximal portion of hand with 4 setae in adults and tritonymphs, seta ph3 present. Axis of fixed chelal finger apically forming a widely obtuse angle; some species from eastern and southeastern Europe with sigmoid fixed chelal finger; chelal fingers usually with more or less close-set teeth, distinctly reclined backwards, dental row of fixed finger without a modified subdistal tooth (mt) ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 9 ); tip of fixed finger without an antiaxial accessory tooth (td); tip of fixed chelal finger of male, tritonymph and deutonymph with neither a deep hollow on paraxial face nor a subapical protuberance (sp); base of movable chelal finger without an enlarged sclerotized condyle, internal proximal apodeme very poorly developed; coupled sensilla pc usually distad of trichobothrium sb, rarely between sb and b (e.g. C. dacnodes , C. tenuis ). All chelal lyrifissure groups present in standard numbers. Anterior margin of carapace more strongly dentate between median macrosetae, usually prominent and frequently with epistome. Coxae II and III with coxal spines; bisetose intercoxal tubercle present between coxae III and IV; distal marginal seta of pedipalpal coxa distinctly longer and thicker than that of coxa I; in addition to the stigmatal setae, sternite III in males and females usually with 10 posterior setae, of which the lateral one on each side is reduced in size (microseta). Male genitalia without a median hiatus between setae of each row of guard-setae.

Type species. Obisium orthodactylum Leach, 1817 .

Distribution. Widespread in Europe, but also present in Macaronesia, North Africa, from Turkey to Central Asia, and U.S.A. (Harvey 2013).

Remarks. The genus Chthonius C.L. Koch, 1843 previously comprised four subgenera: Chthonius s. st., Ephippiochthonius , Globochthonius and Hesperochthonius . Hesperochthonius is easily distinguishable by the presence of a median hiatus dividing each row of the male genital guard-setae into two groups of two setae. The other three subgenera have mainly been distinguished in the literature by a different shape of the chela, the chelal dentition and the presence/absence of a long apodeme at the base of the movable chelal finger.

The arrangement of the coxal spines on coxae II and III and the presence of an intercoxal tubercle have apparently been the reasons for maintaining these subgenera within the genus Chthonius . During this study some new morphological characteristics have been considered and have led to the conclusion that the current known genus Chthonius represents a complex of different genera, as discussed below.

Ephippiochthonius View in CoL was created by Beier (1930) as subgenus of Chthonius View in CoL . In the original description, the characteristics used to distinguish it from Chthonius View in CoL s. str., were the dorsal depression of the chelal hand distad of trichobothria ib and isb, the strong sclerotization of the base of movable chelal finger, and the chelal fingers with upright and well-spaced teeth. Ephippiochthonius View in CoL also differs from Chthonius View in CoL s. str. in the presence of an accessory tooth (td) on antiaxial face at the tip of fixed chelal finger, an enlarged sclerotized condyle at the base of the movable chelal finger and its large proximal apodeme. The presence of a well developed apodeme seems constant within genera and is considered a good characteristic for distinguishing closely related genera, as in the case of the tyrannochthoniines Lagynochthonius View in CoL and Tyrannochthonius View in CoL . The presence of the following characteristics distinguishes Ephippiochthonius View in CoL s. st. from other Chthonius View in CoL -related genera: 3 proximal setae on the chelal hand, lacking ph3 (versus 4 in the other genera); tip of fixed chelal finger of male, tritonymph and deutonymph with a deep hollow on paraxial face and subapical protuberance (sp) (absent in the other genera, except for Spelyngochthonius View in CoL and, in part, for Globochthonius View in CoL ); presence of a prominent medial bow-like protuberance (ip) between chelal condyles (except for Cantabrochthonius View in CoL ). Apart from those concerning external morphology, few studies have been carried out on the subgenera, but the results are significant: Weygoldt (1968) found important differences in the development of the protonymph between Chthonius (C.) ischnocheles View in CoL and C. (E.) tetrachelatus View in CoL ; Legg (1975) described differences in the internal genital structures of Chthonius View in CoL s. st. and Ephippiochthonius View in CoL ; Šťáhlavský & Král (2004), in their karyological analysis of Chthoniidae View in CoL , observed a more pronounced tendency in Ephippiochthonius View in CoL towards reduced chromosome numbers with respect to Chthonius View in CoL s. st.; Murienne et al. (2008: 174) obtained molecular sequences for one species of Ephippiochthonius View in CoL and another of Chthonius View in CoL s. st. in their phylogenetic analysis of pseudoscorpion families, their results reveal a high level of divergence (21.3% COX1 pdistance, based on an analysis of the GenBank sequences), consistent with their belonging to separate genera (Carles Ribera, in litt.). Taken together, the above characteristics differentiating Ephippiochthonius View in CoL from the other Chthonius View in CoL -related genera are important enough to support the elevation of Ephippiochthonius View in CoL to full generic rank, as proposed herein.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF