Porcellionides ibericus, Cifuentes & Da Silva, 2024

Cifuentes, Julio & Da Silva, Luís P., 2024, Revision of the genus Porcellionides Miers, 1877 (Isopoda: Porcellionidae) in the Ibero-Balearic region, European Journal of Taxonomy 939, pp. 1-51 : 40-45

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.939.2573

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C8AD1685-DDA6-4F03-9189-BBC525F54A0D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12189350

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C921D848-D2E0-4FAB-B6A6-98F30D684DFF

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:C921D848-D2E0-4FAB-B6A6-98F30D684DFF

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Porcellionides ibericus
status

sp. nov.

Porcellionides ibericus sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C921D848-D2E0-4FAB-B6A6-98F30D684DFF

Figs 2K View Fig , 25–27 View Fig View Fig View Fig , Table 1 View Table 1

Diagnosis

Integument with small granulations. Glandular fields occupy substantial portion of tergite lateral edge and with numerous pores. Scale-setae very short arrowhead-shaped. Cephalon with broadly curved frontal line and well-defined lateral lobes. Pereon with rounded hind margins on first tergites, and without transverse ridges. Pleon slightly retracted from pereon. Pereopods without sexual differentiation. In males, truncated posterior inner tip in exopod of pleopod I, and short and triangular exopod of pleopod II.

Etymology

The specific epithet refers to ‘ IberiaI ’, the term used by Herodotus (circa 484–425 B.C.) to designate the region now recognized as Iberian Peninsula, where P. ibericus occurs.

Type material

Holotype PORTUGAL – Faro • ♂; Gambelas ; 37.0400° N, 7.9736° W; 29 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; MNCN 20.04 View Materials /20810 (ex. LPS692a). GoogleMaps

Paratypes PORTUGAL – Beja • 1 ♂; Alves ; 37.6091° N, 7.5644° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS246 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS247 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS248 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Belmeque ; 38.0423° N, 7.3874° W; 12 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS254 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Belmeque ; 38.0422° N, 7.3873° W; 12 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS256 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Mértola ; 37.6421° N, 7.6642° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS227 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS226 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀; Mértola ; 37.6432° N, 7.6645° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS231 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; LPS232 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Mértola ; 37.6432° N, 7.6646° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS233 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Mértola ; 37.6413° N, 7.6693° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS235 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Mértola ; 37.6413° N, 7.6696° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS236 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS237 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Mértola ; 37.6372° N, 7.6665° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS242 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀; Mértola ; 37.6406° N, 7.6685° W; 11 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS244 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Pias ; 38.0216° N, 7.4821° W; 12 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS250 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Pias ; 38.0221° N, 7.4817° W; 12 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS253 GoogleMaps 3 ♂♂; São Matias ; 1. Apr. 1983; A. Serra leg.; A. Cruz coll.; CRBA-86572 1 ♀; Vale Perditos ; 37.8228° N, 7.3799° W; 9 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS216 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Vale Perditos ; 37.8227° N, 7.3799° W; 9Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS217 GoogleMaps . – Bragança • 1 ♀; Frechas ; 41.4059° N, 7.1562° W; 5 Jan. 2023; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS736 GoogleMaps . – Castelo Branco • 1 ♂; Perdigão ; 39.6805° N, 7.7264° W; 1 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS523a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS523b GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; LPS524a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS524b GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀; Vila Velha de Ródão ; 39.6540° N, 7.6972° W; 1 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS526 GoogleMaps . – Évora • 1 ♀; Alandroal ; 38.7036° N, 7.3996° W; 2 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS564 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Terena, Santuário de Endovélico de Rocha da Mina ; 38.6634° N, 7.4772° W; 3 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS580a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS580b GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Terena, Santuário de Endovélico de Rocha da Mina ; 38.6630° N, 7.4757° W; 3 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS582 GoogleMaps . – Faro • 1 ♀; Estômbar ; 37.1562° N, 8.4993° W; 28 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS690 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Faro, Gambelas ; 37.0413° N, 7.9729° W; 29 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; MNCN 20.04/20811 (ex. LPS691) GoogleMaps 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; LPS692a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; LPS692b GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; JC770 (ex. LPS692b) GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Faro, Gambelas ; 37.0422° N, 7.9714° W; 29 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva Leg.; MNCN 20.04/20812 (ex. LPS693b) GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Faro, Gambelas ; 37.0420° N, 7.9715° W; 29 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; JC771 (ex. LPS694c) GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Pechão ; 37.0597° N, 7.8707° W; 29 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS698a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS698b GoogleMaps . – Portalegre • 1 ♀; Fronteira de Marvão ; 39.3537° N, 7.3074° W; 1 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS533 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Santana ; 39.6128° N, 7.6625° W; 1 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS530 GoogleMaps . – Santarém • 2 ♀♀; Água de Todo o Ano ; 39.2874° N, 8.1149° W; 3 Dec. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS589 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Aldeia do Mato ; 39.5456° N, 8.2775° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS505a GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS505b GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; MNCN 20.04/20813 (ex. LPS505b) GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; JC773 (ex. LPS505b) GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Tancos ; 39.4619° N, 8.3995° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS499 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Tancos ; 39.4620° N, 8.3996° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS501 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀; Tancos ; 39.4621° N, 8.3997° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS502 GoogleMaps 4 ♀♀; Tancos ; 39.4645° N, 8.3980° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS503 GoogleMaps 1 ♂; Tancos ; 39.4655° N, 8.3980° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; JC772 (ex. LPS504a) GoogleMaps 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; LPS504b GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Tancos ; 39.4620° N, 8.3951° W; 5 Nov. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS508 GoogleMaps . – Setubal • 1 ♀; Herdade da Ribeira Abaixo ; 38.1070° N, 8.5705° W; 28 Apr. 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS273 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Marateca ; 38.5939° N, 8.6775° W; 24 May 2022; L.P. Da Silva leg.; LPS321 GoogleMaps .

SPAIN – Cádiz • 1 ♂; Véjer de la Frontera , La Janda , Cueva Quiñones ; 17 Jan. 1971; Meseguer and Masot leg.; cited as P. sexfasciatus lusitanus by Cifuentes (2021a: fig. 27); A. Cruz coll.; CRBA-86542 .

Description

MEASUREMENTS. Maximum observed length: female 10, 5 mm, male 9 mm.

COLORATION. Highly variable coloration ( Fig. 25A–F View Fig ). Several patterns can be differentiated, which nevertheless establish all series of intermediates between them. First pattern: strongly pigmented specimens, dark brown in color; in pereon, muscle insertions, and central line poorly marked, very small spot at pleonite epimeron edge, pleonite epimera pigmented but with clear lateral edge; in pleon, faint central line, and two clear and wide lateral lines, small light spot at anterior edge, and clear lateral edge. Second pattern: specimens of more or less dark brown color, with middle area and muscle insertions highly pronounced, bordered by darker lines, with large white spots at pleonite epimera edge, and these lightly pigmented. Third pattern: poorly pigmented specimens, light brown in color, with muscle insertions and lines indicated above faintly marked. This coloration generally found in young specimens. Fourth pattern: regardless of coloration, granulations more pigmented, and in many specimens, gradual shift toward reddish tones occurs, starting in anterior pleonite epimeron and extending toward posterior ones, resulting in specimens displaying lateral edge more or less intense red, yellowish, or whitish. Sometimes, body with light reddish tone. Additionally, common for second and third antenna segments to be reddish, although, in some specimens, might be whitish, reddish-brown, or dark, in heavily pigmented individuals.

INTEGUMENTARY CHARACTERS. Integument with small granulations arranged in numerous rows ( Figs 25A– H View Fig , 26B–C View Fig ), more pronounced on cephalon and first pereonites and less distinct towards posterior region, although some specimens are nearly smooth. Glandular fields with high number of pores (Table I). Pereonite I bearing granulations on entire lateral edge, remaining pereonites, situated in middle region and extending to about two-thirds, or even more, of pereonite’s edge. In some specimens, this field extended along entire edge of pereonite VII, although pores not reaching extremities. Noduli laterales, except pereonite I situated in middle region, located on posterior third of initial pereonites and gradually shift towards posterior edge in subsequent segments. In heavily pigmented specimens, highly noticeable due to their location in small depigmented region. b/c and d/c coordinates as in Figs 2K View Fig , 26B View Fig . Circular scales and setae-scales arrow-shaped, short, and rounded tip ( Fig. 26A View Fig ).

SOMATIC CHARACTERS. Body slightly convex. Cephalon with broadly curved frontal line, distinct lateral lobes, and supra-antennal line generally well-marked ( Figs 25G View Fig , 26C View Fig ). Pereon with posterior edge of pereonite I highly rounded ( Figs 26G View Fig , 27C View Fig ), less rounded edges on second and third pereonites, and from fourth to seventh, posterior angle increases, forming pointed shape. Pereonites without transverse ridge. Pleon retracted in relation to pereon ( Fig. 25A–H View Fig ). Short telson, barely surpassing protopod of uropods, with very small base and broad, triangular, and pointed tip, separated from base by well-defined angles ( Figs 25H View Fig , 26D View Fig ).

APPENDAGES. Thick antennae reaching posterior edge of pereonite III; lacking antennal teeth, with first segment of flagellum slightly longer than second. Uropods with transversely oriented posterior edge on protopods, endopods much longer than telson, exopods short and conical in both sexes ( Figs 25H View Fig , 26D View Fig ). Pereopods with no sexual differentiation ( Fig. 25I–J View Fig ). In both sexes, pereopod 1 with strong setae splitting into several tips at end, along with setae for antennal cleaning.

SEXUAL CHARACTERS. In males, outwardly curved endopod of pleopod I ( Fig. 26E View Fig ), exopod wider than long, with well-defined and truncated posterior inner tip ( Figs 25K View Fig , 26F View Fig ), with sinuous tracheal field but no notch. In males, long and slender endopod of pleopod II ( Fig. 26G View Fig ) and short and triangular exopod ( Figs 25L View Fig , 26H View Fig ), devoid of notch. In females, rectangular exopod I with sinuous but non-notched posterior edge ( Fig. 26I View Fig ), and triangular exopod II without notch ( Fig. 26J View Fig ).

Ecology

This epigean species was mostly found beneath rocks, and occasionally under fallen wood, during the daytime. At night, some specimens were also found beneath rocks, while others were collected from above rocks and on walls. Several specimens were encountered alongside Lucasius pallidus ( Budde-Lund, 1885) , Porcellio hoffmannseggii Brandt, 1833 , and Porcellionides elegans .

Remarks

Porcellionides ibericus sp. nov. lacks the transverse ridges on the tergites, which distinguishes it from P. cingendus , P. glaber , P. lucasioides and P. sexfasciatus . In the males, the carpus of the pereopod 1 features a brush of setae in P. fuscomarmoratus , P. elegans , P. pruinosus and P. lusitanus whereas P. ibericus lacks sexual differentiation in the pereopods ( Table 1 View Table 1 ). The cephalon of P. ibericus has moderate lateral lobes, the antennae are thick with flagellum segments of nearly equal size, and the male exopod of the pleopod I has a truncated posterior inner tip. In contrast, P. hispanus lacks lateral lobes on the cephalon, has long and slender antennae with the first segment of the flagellum larger than the second, and the male exopod of the pleopod I lacks a posterior inner tip. Due to the notable variations in coloration in P. ibericus . ( Fig. 25A–F View Fig ), some specimens could potentially be mistaken for P. molleri ( Fig. 19A–H View Fig ). However, there are specific characters that enable accurate identification. In P. molleri males, the carpus of the pereopods 1 and 2 have dense brushes of setae, the posterior inner tip of the exopod of the pleopod I is only slightly pronounced ( Figs 15I View Fig , 19J View Fig ), and the exopod of the pleopod II ( Figs 15J View Fig , 19K View Fig ) along with the female exopods of the pleopods I and II ( Fig. 15K–L View Fig ) are notched. On the other hand, in P. ibericus , pereopods lack sexual differentiation ( Fig. 25I–J View Fig ), the posterior inner tip of the male exopod of the pleopod I is highly pronounced and truncated ( Figs 25K View Fig , 26F View Fig ), and there are no notches on the exopods of the pleopods I and II in males ( Figs 25K–L View Fig , 26F, H View Fig ) or females ( Fig. 26I–J View Fig ).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF