Andrena (Aciandrena) bendai, Wood, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.916.2381 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DC587F6-9DAA-4F6E-BA2A-AD528990BA24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10471030 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6E7EBFDC-157B-4E08-973F-75A6081FCB1B |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:6E7EBFDC-157B-4E08-973F-75A6081FCB1B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Andrena (Aciandrena) bendai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Andrena (Aciandrena) bendai sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6E7EBFDC-157B-4E08-973F-75A6081FCB1B
Fig. 18A–C, E, G View Fig
Diagnosis
Andrena bendai sp. nov. can be recognised as a member of Aciandrena (within the limits of the current subgeneric concept, as discussed above) due to its small body size ( Fig. 18A View Fig ), antefurcal nervulus ( Fig. 18A View Fig ), a propodeal triangle with fine granular shagreen ( Fig. 18B View Fig ), narrow foveae ( Fig. 18E View Fig ), hind tarsal claws lacking an inner tooth in the female sex, and more or less impunctate terga ( Fig. 18G View Fig ). It lacks clearly defining features (head or clypeus not elongate, terga dark and impunctate, ocelloccipital distance not extremely short) and therefore falls close to A. spolata Warncke, 1968 and A. quieta sp. nov., which is described below. The three species are very similar in the female sex, but subtle consistent differences can be seen.
Separation from A. spolata can be made by the shape of the clypeus, the punctation of the paraocular areas, and tergal colouration. In A. bendai sp. nov., the clypeus is strongly domed and uniformly shagreened, more or less dull ( Fig. 18C View Fig ). In A. spolata , the clypeus is only very weakly domed, and the surface is weakly shagreened, weakly shining to smooth and shining apically ( Fig. 18D View Fig ). In A. bendai , the lower paraocular area is unevenly punctate; laterally, adjacent to the compound eye, this area is densely punctate with punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameter. Adjacent to the antennal insertions, this area is essentially impunctate, with at most 1–2 scattered punctures. In A. spolata , the lower paraocular area is regularly punctate over its entire surface, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. In A. bendai , the tergal margins are narrowly lightened hyaline-yellow, colouration not covering the entire marginal area ( Fig. 18G View Fig ). In A. spolata , the marginal areas are entirely lightened hyaline yellow-white ( Fig. 18H View Fig ); this whitish colouration is absent from A. bendai .
Separation from A. quieta sp. nov. can be made principally by three characters relating to head morphology. In A. bendai sp. nov., the clypeus is strongly domed and uniformly shagreened, more or less dull. In A. quieta , the clypeus is only very weakly domed, and the surface is weakly shagreened and weakly shining. In A. bendai , the frons is covered with obscurely raised longitudinal striations, with a weakly raised carina running between the anterior ocellus and the supraclypeal plate ( Fig. 18E View Fig ). In A. quieta , the frons is covered with strong longitudinal striations, medially with a distinctly raised carina running between the anterior ocellus and the supraclypeal plate ( Fig. 18F View Fig ). In A. bendai , the lower paraocular area is unevenly punctate; laterally, adjacent to the compound eye, this area is densely punctate with punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameter. Adjacent to the antennal insertions, this area is essentially impunctate, with at most 1–2 scattered punctures. In contrast, in A. quieta , the lower paraocular area adjacent to the antennal insertions is regularly punctate, punctures separated by 2–3 puncture diameters, not so strongly contrasting the area adjacent to the compound eye, here punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameter.
Etymology
Named after the Czech entomologist Daniel Benda who collected the type series, as well as many other interesting specimens from Morocco and further afield.
Material examined
Holotype
MOROCCO • ♀; Marrakech-Safi, Rehamna, Skhour des Rehamna ; 516 m a.s.l.; 32.4402° N, 7.9202° W; 1–3 Apr. 2019; D. Benda leg.; NMPC.
GoogleMapsParatypes
MOROCCO • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; 516 m a.s.l.; 32.4402° N, 7.9202° W; 1–3 Apr. 2019; D. Benda leg.; NMPC • 1 ♀; Casablanca-Settat , Machraa Ben Abbou env.; 200 m a.s.l.; 1 Apr. 2019; D. Benda leg.; NMPC • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; TJWC • 1 ♀; Marrakech-Safi, Al Haouz, Tinmel env., near river; 1262 m a.s.l.; 30 Mar. 2019; D. Benda leg.; NMPC .
GoogleMapsDescription
Female
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 5–6 mm ( Fig. 18A View Fig ).
HEAD.Dark,1.25 times as wide as long( Fig.18C View Fig ). Clypeus strongly domed, with regular granular shagreen, more or less dull, at most weakly shining apically; surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters. Process of labrum small, triangular, slightly broader than long. Supraclypeal plate weakly domed, with very weak and obscure striations ( Fig. 18E View Fig ). Lower paraocular areas with contrasting punctation, densely punctate laterally adjacent to compound eye, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameter; area adjacent to antennal insertions essentially impunctate. Gena slightly exceeding diameter of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ⅓ to ½ diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae narrow, dorsally occupying ⅓ space between lateral ocellus and compound eye, ventrally narrowing further, diverging from inner margin of compound eye, separated by narrow shining strip subequal to ventral width of fovea; foveae filled with light brown hairs. Frons with weak and obscure longitudinal striations, medially with weakly raised carina running between anterior ocellus and supraclypeal plate; frons with weak green-bronze reflections. Face, gena, frons, and scape with whitish to light brownish hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae dark basally, A5–12 ventrally extensively lightened orange; A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5.
MESOSOMA. Scutum and scutellum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining, with irregular fine punctation, punctures separated by 1–4 puncture diameters. Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining; propodeal triangle with larger granular ‘scale-like’ shagreen, laterally not delineated by carinae ( Fig. 18B View Fig ). Mesepisternum with moderately long light brownish hairs, scutum and scutellum almost hairless, with very short and scattered hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, sparse, composed of weakly plumose light brownish hairs, internal surface with occasional long white, simple hairs. Legs dark basally, mid and hind tarsi lightened dark brown to orange, pubescence light brown. Flocculus incomplete, composed of plumose hairs; flocculus and femoral scopa with white hairs, tibial scopa with whitish to light golden hairs. Hind tibial claws simple, without inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma whitish-brown, venation brown, nervulus strongly antefurcal.
METASOMA. Terga dark, marginal areas narrowly lightened hyaline-yellow ( Fig. 18G View Fig ). Disc of T1 with strong granular microreticulation, weakly shining, sculpture becoming progressively weaker on subsequent terga, T5 with fine shagreen, more strongly shining. Tergal discs essentially impunctate, obscure punctures disappearing into background sculpture. Terga with at most scattered, very short hairs; T2–3 laterally with weakly indicated and widely interrupted apical hairbands of short whitish hairs, T4 with band complete, not obscuring underlying surface; apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate golden orange. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, margin obscurely raised, internal surface regularly and densely punctate, punctures separated by <0.5 puncture diameter.
Male
Unknown.
Distribution
Western Morocco (Casablanca-Settat and Marrakech-Safi).
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |