Coccus cambodiensis Takahashi, 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5087.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:40518AD3-6B53-408C-919D-466C81038C6F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5827999 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BE3D79-FFE5-D421-FF53-FE59FAFF28D5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Coccus cambodiensis Takahashi, 1942 |
status |
|
Coccus cambodiensis Takahashi, 1942 View in CoL
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 and 2 View FIGURE 2 )
The species is known from Kampuchea (García-Morales et al. 2016; Ali 1971) and Hainan Province, China ( Tang 1991) on Ficus retusa (Moraceae) . Tang (1991) remarked that it is morphologically close to P. acutissimus , the type species of the monotypic genus Prococcus .
Diagnosis based on Takahashi (1942) and Tang (1991): Body of adult female narrow, elongate to elongate oval, pointed at anterior and posterior ends, 2.0– 2.5 mm long, 1.0– 1.7 mm wide; young insects in life yellow. Dorsum with derm slightly sclerotized in older females, with well-developed dermal areolations; setae cylindrical with bluntly rounded apices; dorsal tubular ducts absent; submarginal tubercles numbering 14 around body; preopercular pores in an elongate group anterior to anal plates; anal plates each triangular, together quadrate, length of posterior margin almost equal to anterior margin; each plate with 1 subdiscal seta and 2 or 3 apical setae. Marginal setae slender with pointed apices; stigmatic spines numbering 3, median spine longest, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical with a bluntly pointed or rounded apex; lateral spines conical with rounded apices. Venter with antennae reduced to 2 or 3 segments each, mostly 2 (2 segments shown in Takahashi’s (1942) illustration—see Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 and description and Tang’s (1991) description, but 3 segments shown in his illustration—see Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); inter-antennal setae absent or numbering 2 pairs (text in Tang (1991) says they are absent, but his illustration shows 2 pairs of short setae—see Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); submarginal setae present; long pregenital setae numbering 3 pairs; legs reduced, with tibio-tarsus fused, claw digitules usually not discernible; ventral tubular ducts absent; multilocular disc pores very few, present anterior to anal opening, but their frequency and number of loculi are neither mentioned nor illustrated by either Takahashi (1942) or Tang (1991); abdominal segmentation obscure.
Comments. Coccus cambodiensis differs from P. acutissimus as follows (character-states for P. acutissimus given in brackets): (i) body tapering at both ends, each end rounded (tapering at both ends, each end more-or-less pointed); (ii) dorsal derm with numerous areolations (small round or oval clear areas present on the dorsum ( Gill et al. 1977)); (iii) dorsal setae slender and cylindrical with bluntly rounded apices (robust, spine like and slightly tapering with pointed or blunt apices); (iv) claw digitules not discernable, possibly absent (claw digitules unequal, with 1 thick and 1 thin); (v) antennae mainly 2 segmented (mainly 3 segmented); and (vi) inter-antennal setae absent (2 pairs of inter-antennal setae present between antennal bases).
Based on the shared morphological characters listed above, C. cambodiensis is obviously much closer to P. acutissimus than to C. hesperidum , the type species of Coccus . It is here considered to be congeneric with P. acutissimus , and is transferred to the genus Prococcus as Prococcus cambodiensis ( Takahashi, 1942) , comb. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.