Nodoscarus bretoni, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699967 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED29-384F-FF4D-F9D1FEBBF9FB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nodoscarus bretoni |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Nodoscarus bretoni gen. et sp. nov.
( Figs. 427 View FIGURE 427 , 428 View FIGURE 428 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21450 ) , paratype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21451), and dissected paratypes (2 ♀♀, figured) from Pseudodistoma crucigaster Gail, 1972 (MNHN-IT-2008-7337 = MNHN A1/ PSE /73), Cerbère, Mediterranean coast of France, depth 19 m, G. Breton coll., 17 August 1996.
Etymology. Thenew speciesis named after G. Breton, Université de Renne, the collector of the type host.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 427A View FIGURE 427 ) vermiform, cylindrical, unsegmented, and curved. Bodylength 6.83 mm; posterior half of body thicker (0.96 mm in diameter) than anterior half (0.71 mm in diameter). Body surface denselyornamented withcoveringoffine setules. Inlateral view, cephalic region tapering anteriorly and posterior region tapering posteriorly; cephalosome ( Fig. 427C, D View FIGURE 427 ) discernible from metasome by lateral constriction. Free urosome ( Fig. 427B View FIGURE 427 ) discernible from metasome by dorsal suture line, wider than long, with bilobed posterior margin; no trace of suture between metasomeand urosome on ventral side. Caudal rami absent (fully incorporated into bilobed posterior margin), but 1 caudal seta present on tip of paired posterior lobes of abdomen.
Rostrum ( Fig. 427E, F View FIGURE 427 ) large, aslongas wide, tapering towards blunt apex. Antennule ( Fig. 427G View FIGURE 427 ) shortand broad, strongly tapering, 115×150 μm, with 3 or 4 partial sutures along posterior side; armed with setae and ornamented with setules; number of setae not confirmed due to resemblance to setules. Antenna ( Fig. 427H View FIGURE 427 ) 3-segmented, moderately slender; first and second segments (coxa and basis) unarmed; thirdsegment (endopod) about 3.5 times longer than wide (81×23 μm), as long as basis: armed with 8 small setae arranged as 3, 2, and 3, plus terminal claw slightly less than half length of endopod.
Labrum ( Fig. 428A View FIGURE 428 ) setulose, shortand broad, with broad posteromedian protuberance. Mandible ( Fig. 428B View FIGURE 428 ) lacking coxa; palpcomprisingouterprotuberance (exopod) bearing 4 setae, and endopod indistinctly demarcated from basis and incompletely 2-segmented, with 1 seta on mediodistal corner of first segment, and 5 setae (2 medial, 2 distal, and 1 outer) on second segment; all setae on palp weakly pinnate. Maxillule ( Fig. 428C, D View FIGURE 428 ) lobate, obscurely biramous distally, and armed with 2 or 3 setae on medial margin, 4 setaeon outer ramus, and 3 setae on inner ramus (1 of 3 setae on medial margin small or may be lacking). Maxilla ( Fig. 428E View FIGURE 428 ) 3-segmented and armed with 4, 1, and 3 pinnate setae on first to third segments, respectively; thirdsegment incompletely articulated from second. Maxillipeds and legs absent.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Species of Nodoscarus gen. nov. can be differentiated from one another by the different setation patterns of the mouthparts. The mandible and maxillule of N. bretoni gen. et sp. nov. are each armed with 10 setae, the highest number of setae found in any species of Nodoscarus gen. nov.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |