Nodoscarus rectus, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5729513 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED2A-3848-FCEF-FD65FD75F8C7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nodoscarus rectus |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Nodoscarus rectus gen. et sp. nov.
( Fig. 433 View FIGURE 433 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21455 ) , paratypes (2 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21456), and dissected paratypes (2 ♀♀, figured) from Aplidium sp., lobster wall, Mabul Island, Malaysia (04°14.53 Ń, 118°37.57 É), depth 17 m, 22 February 2004.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin rect (meaning “straight”) and refers to the linear body of the new species.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 433A View FIGURE 433 ) elongate, vermiform, cylindrical, straight, and unsegmented. Body length 5.57 mm; body width 0.63 mm. Cephalosome ( Fig. 433B View FIGURE 433 ) semicircular, slightly widerthan long, discernible from metasome by being narrower. Metasome entirely forming brood pouch, with parallel lateral margins. Urosome small, notarticulated from metasome, but defined from metasome by being narrower. Caudal rami ( Fig 433C View FIGURE 433 ) small, about 1.5 timeslongerthan wide (48×33 μm): armed with several setae or setules, 2 setae near middle larger than others.
Rostrum ( Fig. 433D View FIGURE 433 ) large, elongate, about 0.7 times as long as cephalosome, 2.3 times longer than wide (210×91 μm), with nearly parallel lateral margins in proximal two-fifths, abruptly narrowing and tapering in distal three-fifths; ventral surface ornamented with fine setules. Antennule ( Fig. 433E View FIGURE 433 ) lobate, unsegmented, armed and ornamented with mix of setae and setules distally. Antenna ( Fig. 433F View FIGURE 433 ) 3-segmented; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod about 3.1 timeslongerthan wide (59×19 μm); armedwith 5 smallsetae (arranged as 1, 2, and 2) plus small terminal claw, less than half length of endopod.
Labrum short and broad, unornamented, with convex lateral margins and slightly concave posterior margin. Mandible ( Fig. 433G View FIGURE 433 ) lobate, bearing 9 setae. Maxillule ( Fig. 433H View FIGURE 433 ) also lobate, bearing 9 setae (3 medial setae distinctly smaller than others). Maxilla ( Fig. 433I View FIGURE 433 ) 3-segmented and armed with 4, 1, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively; articulation between second and third segments incomplete; 2 of 3 setae on third segment shorter but broad. Maxillipeds and legs absent.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Nodoscarus rectus gen. et sp. nov. is very similar to N. scutatus gen. et sp. nov. They both possess defined caudal rami and have the same numbers of setae on the mandible, maxillule, and maxilla. In particular, the shapes of the setae on the maxilla are alike in these two species. The differences between them are very slight, but are sufficient to allow us recognize them as distinct species. The main differences are: (1) the caudal rami are not articulated from the urosome and are 1.45 times longer than wide in N. rectus gen. et sp. nov. but are clearly defined from urosome and 1.13 times longer than wide in N. scutatus gen. et sp. nov.; (2) the rostrum is widest in the proximal 40% and abruptly narrowing and tapering in the distal 60% in N. rectus gen. et sp. nov. but it is slightly narrower in the proximal third, widest in middle, and tapering in the distal two-thirds in N. scutatus gen. et sp. nov.; (3) the mandible is uniramous in N. rectus gen. et sp. nov. but biramous in N. scutatus gen. et sp. nov.; and (4) all five observed specimens of N. rectus gen. et sp. nov. have straight bodies whereas the single specimen of N. scutatus gen. et sp. nov. has a curved body.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |