Nodoscarus latirostris, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6422176 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED2C-38B4-FF4D-F89FFDFCFC8F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nodoscarus latirostris |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Nodoscarus latirostris gen. et sp. nov.
( Fig. 434 View FIGURE 434 )
Type material. Holotype ♀ (dissected and mounted on a slide, MNHN-IU-2014-21457 ) from Cystodytes violatinctus Monniot, F., 1988 , Grand Terre, Canal Woodin , New Caledonia, depth 3 m, Monniot coll., 18 September 1985.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin lat (=wide) and rostr (=snout), referring to the broad rostrum of the new species.
Description of female. Body ( Fig. 434A View FIGURE 434 ) vermiform, cylindrical, unsegmented, taperinganteriorly and posteriorly. No traces of division of cephalosome, metasome, and urosome present. Posterior half of body recurved ventrally. Body length 5.54 mm; body width 1.03 mm at widest region in middle. Body surface ornamented withdensecoveringof finesetulesanteriorlybutbecoming more sparse posteriorly. Posterodorsal region lacking any trace of transverse vestigial suture delimiting prosome from abdomen. Posterior margin of body bilobed, with median (anal) incision ( Fig. 434C View FIGURE 434 ). Caudal rami fully incorporated into posterior margin; caudal setae lacking.
Rostrum ( Fig. 434B, D View FIGURE 434 ) roughly quadrangular in ventral view, setulose, wider than long, with straight posteriormargin and slightly convex lateral margins; both posterolateral corners rounded. Antennule ( Fig. 434E View FIGURE 434 ) lobate, shorter than rostrum, unsegmented, setulose but lacking setae. Antenna ( Fig. 434F View FIGURE 434 ) 3-segmented, first segment (coxa) obscure; basis unarmed; endopod about 2.2 times longer than wide (41×18 μm) and 0.7 times longerthan basis: armedwith 7 smallsetae (arranged as 2, 2, and 3) plus terminal claw half as long as endopod.
Labrum ( Fig. 434G View FIGURE 434 ) with slightly concave posterior margin and convex lateral margins; ornamented with scattered setules on ventral surface. Mandible ( Fig. 434H View FIGURE 434 ) lobate, unsegmented, armedwith 9 setae (1 medial, 1 medial subdistal, 3 distal, and 4 outer); all setae naked. Maxillule ( Fig. 434I View FIGURE 434 ) lobate with 9 pinnate setae increasing in length from inner to outer. Maxilla ( Fig. 434J View FIGURE 434 ) distinctly 3-segmented, armedwith 2, 2, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively; all setae weakly pinnate. Maxillipeds and legs absent.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. In Nodoscarus gen. nov. the setation of the maxilla appears to vary according to species. In N. latirostris gen. et sp. nov. the maxilla is 3-segmented and armed with 2, 2, and 3 setae on the first to third segments, respectively. This setation pattern is unique within the genus, because in the four other congeners with a 3- segmented maxilla the setation pattern is 4, 1, and 3 (in N. bretoni gen. etsp. nov., N. scutatus gen. etsp. nov., and N. rectus gen. etsp. nov.), or 2, 1, and 4 (in N. curvus gen. etsp. nov.).
The form of the rostrum of N. latirostris , which is quadrangular in ventral view and wider than long, also serves to characterise this new species, considering that the rostrum of its congeners are typically longer than wide, or tapering with a rounded apex.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |