Ooneidescalifornica, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4591361 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-ED3B-385F-FF4D-F8E1FAB3F835 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ooneidescalifornica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ooneidescalifornica sp. nov.
( Fig. 419 View FIGURE 419 )
Type material. Holotype ♀ (dissected and mounted on a slide, MNHN-IU-2014-21443 ) from an ascidian of the family Didemnidae , La Jolla, California, USA, R A. Lewin coll., 12 December 1985.
Etymology. The species name refers to the type locality, California.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 419A View FIGURE 419 ) ovoid, laterally compressed, unsegmented, with minute abdomen. Bodylength (prosome length) 2.29 mm; dorsoventral depth 1.66 mm. Cephalosome not defined. Cephalic appendages and abdomen close to each other, both positioned on short ventral margin of body. Copulatory pore present on ventrodistal surface of body, just anterior to base of abdomen. Abdomen ( Fig. 419B View FIGURE 419 ) rudimentary, not articulated from prosome, unsegmented, much wider than long. Caudal rami small, not articulated from abdomen; armed with 2 (on right caudal ramus) or 4 (on left caudal ramus) setae.
Rostrum ( Fig. 419D View FIGURE 419 ) stronglytapering, widerthan long, sparsely setulose along free posterior margin. Antennule ( Fig. 419E View FIGURE 419 ) 2-segmented, strongly curved with expanded first segment and small second segment; armature comprising 13 setae and 1 aesthetasc on first segment, 6 setae and 1 aesthetasc on second. Antenna ( Fig. 419F View FIGURE 419 ) stout, 3-segmented; coxaandbasisunarmed; unsegmented endopod twice as long as wide (34×17 μm); armedwith 4 smallsetae (2 in middle and 2 distal) plus small terminal claw, one-third as long as endopod and distinctly articulated at base.
Labrum ( Fig. 419C View FIGURE 419 ) with smooth, convex posterior margin. Mandible ( Fig. 419H View FIGURE 419 ) and maxillule ( Fig. 419I View FIGURE 419 ) each as small lobe bearing 4 setae, some setae branched distally. Maxilla and maxilliped absent. Paired blunt tubercles ( Fig. 419G View FIGURE 419 ) present lateral to oral region (indicated by arrowhead in Fig. 419C View FIGURE 419 ).
Leg 1 ( Fig. 419J View FIGURE 419 ) widerthan long, lamellate, directed anteriorly, unsegmented, distally bilobed; both lobes setulose; inner lobe bearing apical claw directed medially. Legs 2–5 absent.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Ooneides amela , the only previously known species of the genus, was initially recorded from the Mediterranean coast of France ( Chatton & Brément, 1915) and later redescribed by Illg & Dudley (1961). Ooneides californica sp. nov. differs from O. amela , as follows: (1) the body is larger, 2.29 mm long, compared to 1.0 to 1.5 mm for O. amela measured by Chatton & Brément (1915) or 1.7 mm measured by Illg & Dudley (1961); (2) the rostrum is wider than long, cf. elongate in O. amela ; (3) the mandible is a simple lobe bearing 4 setae, whereas in O. amela itis bilobed, bearing 9 ( Chatton & Brément, 1915) or more than 10 setae ( Illg & Dudley, 1961); (4) the maxillule is armed with 4 setae, compared to only 2 setae in O. amela ( Illg & Dudley, 1961); (5) the mouthparts are exposed, whereas they are surrounded by four pairs of ventral lobes as illustrated by Chatton & Brément (1915) and Illg & Dudley (1961); and (6) a prominent tubercle present on each side of the oral region in the new species, which is not present in O. amela .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |