Doropygella calla, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699839 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EE63-3B00-FF4D-FD03FCC1FC8C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Doropygella calla |
status |
sp. nov. |
Doropygella calla sp. nov.
( Figs. 205 View FIGURE 205 , 206 View FIGURE 206 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21303 ) , paratypes (2 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21304), anddissectedparatype (♀, figured) from Culeolus hospitalis Monniot F. & Monniot C., 2003 (MNHN-IT-2008-2474 = MNHN S2/ CUL /52), Vanuatu, SE Santo, Guyot Bougainvillé, “Alis” (16°01’S, 166°40’E), depth 1014-1050 m, Bouchet & Richer de Forges-IRD coll., 10 October 1994.
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin callo (= thick skinned), referring to the thick, rigid exoskeleton of the new species.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 205A View FIGURE 205 ) distinctly segmented with rigid exoskeleton. Body length 4.35 mm; prosomeabout 3.2 mm long. Cephalosome very broad, with ventrolaterally expanded dorsal cephalic shield. First pedigerous somite free, with large ventral tubercle just anterior to intercoxal plate of leg 1 ( Fig. 206D View FIGURE 206 ). Second and third pedigerous somites each with well-developed, rounded epimera. Fouth pedigerous somite forming sub-circular brood pouch, tapering in distal third (in lateral view) towards pointed posterodorsal margin. Free urosome ( Fig. 205B View FIGURE 205 ) 5-segmented; genitalsomite short; 4 free abdominal somites expanded posteriorly, 459×474, 326×430, 237×356, and 422×378 μm, respectively. Caudalramus ( Fig. 205C View FIGURE 205 ) about 4.1 timeslongerthan wide (441×107 μm) and slightly longer than anal somite, gradually narrowing distally, with distal part attenuated: armed with very small, thin setae; 4 distal setae hardly visible; outer proximal and dorsal setae about half as long as width of ramus at base, located at 35 and 63% of ramus length, respectively.
Coxa | Basis | Exopod | Endopod | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 | 0-0 | 1-I | I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3 |
Leg 2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-1; I-1; III, I, 40-1; 0-2; 1, II, II+1 | |
Leg 3 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, II, |
II+1 | ||||
Leg 4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-0; I-1; II, I, 3 | 0-1; 0-1 (or 0-2); |
1, II, I+1 |
Rostrum ( Fig. 205D View FIGURE 205 ) longerthanwide; proximal two-thirds with nearly parallel lateral margins, distal third acutely convex. Antennule ( Fig. 205E View FIGURE 205 ) 9-segmented; first 3 segments greatly broadened, distal 6 segments slender, cylindrical; armatureformula 2, 17, 6, 2, 4, 4, 2, 3, and 7+aesthetasc; all setae thin and naked. Antenna ( Fig. 205F View FIGURE 205 ) robust, comprising coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis unarmed, narrowing in middle, ornamented with few setules in mid inner margin; first endopodal segment wider than long, unarmed; compound distal endopodal segment much narrower than proximal segments, about 3.3 timeslongerthan wide (167×50 μm); armed with 10 small setae and row of fine spinules at outer subdistal region, plus terminal claw about half as long as segment.
Labrum ( Fig. 206A View FIGURE 206 ) with trilobate, setulose free posterior margin. Mandible ( Fig. 205G View FIGURE 205 ) with 5 teeth on coxalgnathobase; basiswith 1 setaonmedial margin; exopod short, unsegmented with 5 large, equal setae; endopod with 4 and 10 setae on first and second segments, respectively. Maxillule ( Fig. 205H View FIGURE 205 ) with 10 setaeon arthrite, 1 on coxal endite, 2 on epipodite, and 4 on basis (proximal seta small), 4 on exopod, and 6 on endopod; endopod subdivided by incomplete lateral suture into proximal part bearing 2 medial setae and short distal part bearing 4 setae. Maxilla ( Fig. 206B View FIGURE 206 ) 4-segmented; syncoxa with 4, 1, 2, and 3 setae on first to fourth endites, respectively, one seta on first endite short and naked; basis with slender claw plus 1 seta; 2-segmented endopod very small, first segment unarmed, secondsegment bearing 5 small naked setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 206C View FIGURE 206 ) 3-segmented, articulation incomplete between first and second segments; first segment with 6 setae (1 proximal and 5 distal) and ornamented with scattered minute spinules; second segment unarmed but with few setules on inner margin; small third segment with 3 large setae.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 206 View FIGURE 206 D-G) with broad coxa and basis and 3-segmented rami: exopods and endopods wellseparated from each other. Inner coxal seta absentin all legs. Spines on exopods and endopod strong, with smooth unornamented margins. Inner setae on second and third exopodal segments of leg 4 small and naked. Second endopodal segment of leg 4 with 1 or 2 inner setae. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Leg 5 ( Fig. 206H View FIGURE 206 ) consistingof protopod and exopod; protopod withthinouter distal seta; free exopodalsegment about 3.8 times longerthan wide (215×56 μm), bearing thin seta on attenuated apex; segment unornamented, lacking any spinule rows. Leg 6 absent.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Among its congeners, Doropygella calla sp. nov. is most similarto the type species, D. thorelli , because both these two species share the possession of a small 2-segmented endopod on the maxilla, which has an unarmed first segment and bears 5 setae on the second, and both have spines on the third endopodal segments of legs 2–4.
The salient differences between the new species and D. thorelli are: (1) the free exopodal segment of leg 5 is short (only 1.6 timeslongerthan wide) in D. thorelli , but elongate (3.8 timeslongerthan wide) in D. calla sp. nov.; (2) the third exopodal segment of leg 2 is armed with 4 spines and 5 setae (formula III, I, 5) in D. thorelli , but with 4 spines and 4 setae (III, I, 4) in D. calla sp. nov.; (3) the third endopodal segment of legs 2 and 3 is armed with 3 spines and 3 setae (1, II, I+2) in D. thorelli , but with 4 spines and 2 setae (1, II, II+1) in D. calla sp. nov.; (4) the first exopodal segment of leg 4 bears an inner seta in D. thorelli , but this seta is absent in D. calla sp. nov.; and (5) the third exopodal segment of leg 4 is armed with 3 spines and 4 setae (II, I, 4) in D. thorelli , but with 3 spines and 3 setae (II, I, 3) in D. calla sp. nov. These differences are sufficient to justify the establishment of the new species.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |