Pentachaetusspinatus, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699907 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EEBC-3BC4-FCEF-F925FDF7FE8E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pentachaetusspinatus |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Pentachaetusspinatus gen. etsp. nov.
( Figs. 328 View FIGURE 328 , 329 View FIGURE 329 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21378 ) anddissectedparatype (♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21379) from unidentified immature host of family Didemnidae, Canal Woodin, Grande Terre New Caledonia, depth 32 m, Monniot coll., 12 March 1987.
Etymology.Thespecificnamereferstothepossession of the paired spiniform posterolateral processes on the dorsalcephalic shield.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 328A View FIGURE 328 ) slightly expanded; bodylength 0.99 mm. Prosome curved ventrally: cephalosome well-defined from metasome; dorsal cephalic shield extended ventrolaterally and bearing paired posteroventral process; processes thin, straight, thorn-like, 25 μm long, ornamented with 4 or 5 fine spinules distally on dorsal margin ( Fig. 328B View FIGURE 328 ). Metasome with 2 incomplete articulations dividing first to third pedigerous somites; third and fourth pedigerous somites fused, both containing large eggs inside. Free urosome ( Fig. 328C View FIGURE 328 ) cylindrical, graduallynarrowing posteriorly:genitalsomite 42×97 μm, 4 abdominalsomites sparsely ornamented with setules on all surfaces, 47×86, 48×75, 36×67, and 54×62 μm, respectively. Anal somite with narrow posteromedian incision. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 328D View FIGURE 328 ) tapering, about 3.3 timeslongerthan wide (65×20 μm), and ornamented with few setules; armed with 5 setae (outer lateral, dorsal, and 3 distal), all setae naked and longer than width of ramus at base, largest seta 105 μm long, 1.6 times longer than ramus, second longest adjacent seta 60 μm long; outer lateral and dorsal seta positioned at 27 and 43% of ramus length, respectively.
Rostrum ( Fig. 328E View FIGURE 328 ) subtriangular, 69×70 μm, setulose, with blunt apex.Antennule ( Fig. 328F View FIGURE 328 ) relatively slender, 147 μmlong, 6-segmented; armatureformula 2, 15, 5, 3+aesthetasc, 4+aesthetasc, and 10+2 aesthetascs; all setae naked; aesthetascs setiform (thin and short). Antenna ( Fig. 328G View FIGURE 328 ) 3-segmented, comprising coxa, basis and unsegmented endopod; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod about 4.1 times longer than wide (62×15 μm) and as long as basis: armed with 6 setae arranged as 1, 2, and 3; proximalmost seta longer than width of endopod; 3 distal setae bluntly tipped, all shorter than claw; terminal claw small, about 20 μm long, one-quarter as long as endopod.
Coxa | Basis | Exopod | Endopod | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 | 0-0 | 1-I | I-1; I, 1, 5 0-1; | 0-1; 1, 2, 3 |
Leg 2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0; 1-0; 3, 1, 5 | 0-0; 0-0; 0, 2, 3 |
Leg 3 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0; 1-0; 3, 1, 5 | 0-0; 1, 2, 2 |
Leg 4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0; 1-0; 3, 1, 4 | 0-0; 1, 2, 1 |
Labrum soft, hardly discernible. Mandible ( Fig. 328H View FIGURE 328 ) with relatively narrow coxal gnathobase bearing 5 acute teeth and 1 small seta: basis with 1 setaonmedial margin: exopod with 5 setae, outermost only 0.6 times as long as other 4 setae: endopod 2-segmented; first segment with 1 proximally broadened seta; second segment with 4 unequal setae (proportional lengths of setae 1, 2, 3, and 2.2 from inner to outer). Maxillule ( Fig. 328I View FIGURE 328 ) with 9 setae on arthrite, 1 on each epipodite and basis, 4 on exopod and 3 on endopod (endopodal setae unequal in length, medial seta shortest and outer longest). Maxilla ( Fig. 329A View FIGURE 329 ) 4- segmented, armed with 4, 2, and 2 setae on first to third endites on syncoxa, claw plus 2 very unequal setae on basis, and 1 and 3 setae on first and second endopodal segments, respectively; claw on basis ornamented with several minute spinules distally on concave margin. Maxilliped ( Fig. 328J View FIGURE 328 ) unsegmented, lobate, armedwith 6 setae and ornamented with spinules on outer surface.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 329 View FIGURE 329 B-F) lacking inner coxal seta. Outer seta on basis pinnate in leg 1, but naked in legs 2–4. Leg 1 bearing small inner distal spine on basis, 12 μm long; exopod 2-segmented, with vestige of articulation on compound distal segment; 2 inner proximal setae on third endopodal segment markedly elongate, about 3 times longerthan ramus. All setae on legs 2–4 naked. Leg 2 with 3-segmented rami. Legs 3 and 4 with 3-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; both legs slightly asymmetrical in length and in shape of setae on left and right sides; outer setae on exopod and all setae on endopod attenuated in left leg but bluntly tipped in right leg, and inner setae on third exopodal segment long in left leg but shorter in right leg (cf. Fig. 329D and E View FIGURE 329 ). Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Leg 5 ( Fig. 329G View FIGURE 329 ) consistingof protopodal lobe bearing digitiform outer distal process tipped with 1 seta, plus pointed inner (exopodal) process tapering distally from broad base and bearing 1 seta on outer margin.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. Unlike its two congeners described below, Pentachaetusspinatus gen. etsp. nov. has thin, spiniform, horn-like processes posterolaterally on the dorsal cephalic shield. It also has a triangular rostrum which is as long as wide, the outer setaon the exopod of the mandible is 0.6 times as long as other 4 exopodal setae, and the inner exopodal process of leg 5 is broadened at its base. These and other differences between the species of Pentachaetus gen. nov. are summarised in Table 11 View TABLE 11 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |