Chelipygus bulbosus, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6421647 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EEC3-3BA0-FF4D-F8BDFE09F9D9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chelipygus bulbosus |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Chelipygus bulbosus gen. et sp. nov.
( Figs. 267 View FIGURE 267 , 268 View FIGURE 268 )
Typematerial. Holotype (intact ♀, MNHN-IU-2014- 21337 ) , paratypes (2 intact ♀♀, MNHN-IU-2014-21338), anddissectedparatype (♀, figured) from Molgula amesophleba (Codreanu & Mack-Fira, 1956) , Etang de Leucate on Mediterranean coast of France, Clanzig coll., 1985.
Etymology. The specific name refers to the bulbous prosome of the new species.
Descriptionoffemale. Body ( Fig. 267A View FIGURE 267 ) slightly compressed: bodylength 3.40 mm. Prosome 2.45 mm long, consisting of small cephalosome with well defined cephalic shield and strongly inflated, unsegmented metasome. Metasome bulbous, gradually broadening posteriorly; entire metasome forming brood pouch. Free urosome ( Fig. 267B View FIGURE 267 ) 5-segmented, cylindrical, gradually narrowing distally: genital and 4 abdominal somites 158×406, 297×358, 273×320, 176×273, and 158×230 μm, respectively. Anal somite with deep posteromedian incision. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 267C View FIGURE 267 ) evenly tapering distally, 3.9 times longer than wide (293×75 μm) and 1.85 timeslongerthan anal somite: armedwith 2 naked setae (outer proximal and dorsal) and 4 distal spines; outer proximal and dorsal setae short (less than half width width of ramus at base), located at 29 and 63% of ramus length, respectively; 4 distal spines ( Fig. 267D View FIGURE 267 ) small, conical, largest 15 μm and smallest 11 μm long.
Rostrum ( Fig. 267E View FIGURE 267 ) 158×198 μm, consistingof broad, steeply tapering proximal third, weakly tapering in distal two-thirds towards blunt apex. Antennule ( Fig. 267F View FIGURE 267 ) 303 μm long, 9-segmented; first and second segments markedly broader than more distal segments; armatureformula 3, 16, 6, 4+aesthetasc, 4, 2+aesthetasc, 2, 2+aesthetasc, 7+aesthetasc; first segment ornamented with proximal patch of minute spinules on anterior surface; 2 large pinnate setaeon first segment, all other setae naked and much smaller. Antenna ( Fig. 267G View FIGURE 267 ) 4- segmented; coxa unarmed; basis 98×53 μm, with 1 small seta distally; first endopodal segment 76×55 μm, with 1 smallseta subdistally; compounddistalendopodal segment 88×35 μm, armedwith 8 smallsetae (arranged as 1, 3, 1, and 3) plusterminal claw about 60 μm long, 0.68 times as long as segment.
Labrum ( Fig. 267H View FIGURE 267 ) with large, semicircular posteromedianlobe. Mandible ( Fig. 267I View FIGURE 267 ) with 5 teeth and 1 small seta on coxal gnathobase, distalmost tooth acutely pointed; basis with 1 seta subdistally on medial margin; exopod with 5 setae, 2 distal setae shorter than proximal 3; endopod indistinctly articulated from basis, armed with 4 and 9 setae on first and second segments, respectively; 2 distal setae on second segment distinctly longer than other setae. Paragnath ( Fig. 268A View FIGURE 268 ) with scattered spinules on apex and dense setules on medial margin. Maxillule ( Fig. 267J View FIGURE 267 ) with 9 setaeon arthrite, 1 broad, blunt seta on coxal endite, 2 unequal setae on epipodite, 3 subequal setae on medial margin of basis, 4 setae on exopod (outer seta distinctly larger than medial 3), and 2 setae on endopod; endopod much smaller than exopod. Maxilla ( Fig. 268B View FIGURE 268 ) armedwith 9 setaeon syncoxa (arranged as 3, 1, 2, and 3), 3 on basis, and 1, 1, and 4 on first to third endopodal segments, respectively; distal setaon basis about half as long as middle seta; 2 of 4 setae on third endopodal segment small and naked. Maxilliped ( Fig. 268C View FIGURE 268 ) incompletely 2-segmented; first segment with 9 setae medially; short second segment with 2 setae apically.
Legs 1–4 with 3-segmented rami ( Fig. 268 View FIGURE 268 D-F). Inner coxal seta of legs 1–4 large, extending to distal tip of endopod. Outer seta on basis of leg 1 broad, sclerotized, and tipped with thin flagellum ( Fig. 268D View FIGURE 268 inset). Inner distal spine on basis of leg 1 short, 45 μm long, not reaching distal border of first endopodal segment. Outer setae on exopod of leg 1 and all setae on third exopodal segment of legs 2–4 naked and shorter than inner setae on exopod. Inner and distal setae on third endopodal segment of legs 2–4 also naked and shorter than inner setae on endopod. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Coxa Basis Exopod | Endopod | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 | 0-1 | 1-I | I-1; I-1; III, I, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3 |
Legs 2 & 30-1 | 1-0 | 1-1; 1-1; 3, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3 | |
Leg 4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-1; 1-1; 2, 1, 5 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 2 |
Leg 5 ( Fig. 268G View FIGURE 268 ) protopod wider than long, not articulated with somite, with small seta on outer margin and row of small spinules distally; free exopodal segment about 3.2 times longer than wide (136×42 μm), armed distally with slender spine (33 μm long) and thin seta (66 μm long), ornamented with 3 rows of minute spinules on dorsomedial surface.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks. The 3-segmented condition of the endopods of legs 2–4 seems to be the most prominent feature separating the type species from its two congeners, C. catalai and C. dinardensis gen. etsp. nov. described below, both of which have 2-segmented endopods. The presence of 4 setae on the third endopodal segment of the maxilla is another distinguishing feature of C. bulbosus gen. et sp. nov., since the other two species both have only 3 setae on this segment.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |