Notopterophoroides quadridentatum, Kim & Boxshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.4.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5699765 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C487CB-EFE3-3A80-FCEF-FE54FF24FAAC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Notopterophoroides quadridentatum |
status |
sp. nov. |
Notopterophoroides quadridentatum sp. nov.
( Figs. 117 View FIGURE 117 , 118 View FIGURE 118 )
Type mataerial. Holotype (intact ♂, MNHN-IU-2014- 21254 ) and paratype (♂, dissected and figured) from Phallusia arabica Savigny, 1816 (MNHN-IT-2008-6109 = MNHN P5/ PHA /75), MUA 3, Nosy Be, Madagascar, P. Laboute coll.
Etymology. The specific name quadridentatum refers to the presence of four teeth on the mandibular gnathobase.
Descriptionofmale. Body ( Fig. 117A View FIGURE 117 ) moderately narrow, slightly compressed. Bodylength 1.34 mm: prosome 854 μm long, tapering anteriorly in lateral view, obscurely segmented by weak constrictions and wrinkles between somites. Dorsoventral depth of prosome 340 μm. Dorsal cephalothoracic shield distinct. Fifth pedigerous somite fused with fourth. Free urosome distinctly 5- segmented. Anal somite ( Fig. 117B, C View FIGURE 117 ) short, half as long as wide, protruding posteroventrally, ornamented with scattered spinules on ventral surface; anal operculum discernible. Caudalramus ( Fig. 117B View FIGURE 117 ) small, about 1.3 times longer than wide (32×25 μm), armed with 3 claws and 3 setae ( Fig. 117C View FIGURE 117 ) and ornamented with spinules scattered over all surfaces; lengths of claws 22, 20, and 12 μm; all shorter than ramus. Spermatophore ( Fig. 117D View FIGURE 117 ) 75×32 μm, with thick wall and short tube.
Rostrum ( Fig. 117E View FIGURE 117 ) widerthan long, 65×125 μm, nearly semicircular. Antennule ( Fig. 117F View FIGURE 117 ) short, 117 μmlong, and 7-segmented; armatureformula 7, 13, 12+aesthetasc, 6, 6, 4+aesthetasc, and 5+aesthetasc; setae extremely crowded, all naked. Antenna ( Fig. 117G View FIGURE 117 ) 4- segmented; coxa short; basis slightly longer than wide, with pinnate exopodal seta and several small spinules on inner margin; first endopodal segment longer than basis, with 1 naked seta subdistally on outer margin; compound distal endopodal segment about 3.1 times longer than wide (47×15 μm), ornamented with spinules on outer and inner margins; armedwith 9 setae (including 3 bluntly tipped) plus terminal claw about half as long as segment.
Labrum ( Fig. 117H View FIGURE 117 ) with large posteromedianlobe bearing setules on posterolateral surfaces. Mandibular coxalgnathobase ( Fig. 117I View FIGURE 117 ) with 4 teeth, 2 smallproximal setae, and 2 needle-like spinules between second and third teeth: basis of mandible with small mediodistal seta ( Fig. 117J View FIGURE 117 ): exopod 2-segmentedwith 3 and 2 setaeon first and second segments, respectively; terminal seta on second segment about 0.7 times as long as other 4 setae: endopod with 4 and 9 setaeon first and second segments, respectively; apical seta on second endopodal segment enlarged. Maxillule ( Fig. 117K View FIGURE 117 ) with 9 setaeon arthrite, 1 on coxal endite, 2 on epipodite, 3 on basis, 3 on exopod and 4 on endopod. Maxilla ( Fig. 117L View FIGURE 117 ) 5-segmented; syncoxa with 3 (including small naked seta), 1, 2, and 2 setae on first to fourth endites, respectively; basis with 2 setae; endopod with 1, 1, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( Fig. 118A View FIGURE 118 ) distinctly 2-segmented with 9 (4+5) medial setae on first segment and 2 apical setae on second.
Legs 1–4 ( Fig. 118 View FIGURE 118 B-E) with 3-segmented rami. Inner coxal seta absent on legs 1–4. Inner distal spine on basis of leg 1 slightly longer than first endopodal segment, straight and spinulose. Third exopodal segment of leg 1 bearing small seta as proximalmost outer element. Second endopodal segment bearing 1 inner seta in legs 1 and 4, but with 2 inner setae in legs 2 and 3. Armature formula for legs 1–4 as follows:
Coxa | Basis | Exopod | Endopod | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leg 1 | 0-0 | 1-I | I-1; I-1; 1, II, 4 | 0-0; 0-1; 1, 2, 2 |
Leg 2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-1; I-0; 3, 1, 4 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 3, 2 |
Leg 3 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-1; I-0; 2, 1, 4 | 0-1; 0-2; 1, 3, 2 |
Leg 4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | I-0; I-0; 2, 1, 4 | 0-1; 0-1; 1, 3, 1 |
Leg 5 ( Fig. 118F View FIGURE 118 ) consisting of short protopod and small free exopod; left and right protopods fused to form protopodal plate bearing pinnate seta at each outer corner ornamented with few inner spinules: exopodal segment suboval, slightly longer than wide (18×16 μm) with 1 pinnate seta on apex and 3 small sensillae on ventral surface. Leg 6 ( Fig. 118F View FIGURE 118 ) represented by 2 pinnate setae on distal margin of genital operculum.
Female. Unknown,
Remarks. Speciesof the genus Notopterophoroides seem to exhibit very little sexual dimorphism, as indicated by N. armadillo redescribed above. This weak sexual dimorphism allows us to describe N. quadridentatum sp. nov. on the basis of the male, since robust comparisons can still be made with its other congeners.
The most remarkable feature of the new species is the 3-segmented endopod of leg 1. Within the genus this feature is shared only with N. malacodermatus , which Schellenberg (1922) described very imperfectly, illustrating only the exopod of leg 3 and leg 5. His figured leg 5 is somewhat similar to that of N. quadridentatum sp. nov., but the protopodal seta is longer than the apical seta on the exopod, the exopod of leg 3 lacks an inner seta on the first segment, and the outer spines on the exopod are very short. These differences are sufficient to distinguish N. quadridentatums sp. nov. from other congeneric species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |