Phalloceros elachistos, Lucinda, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1679-62252008000200001 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064494 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D2787D4-1D50-FFA3-DFC7-5480C7CDFC68 |
treatment provided by |
Julia |
scientific name |
Phalloceros elachistos |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phalloceros elachistos View in CoL , new species
Figs. 21 View Fig , 22 View Fig
Phalloceros sp. n. U Lucinda & Reis (2005).
Holotype. MCP 30468, córrego Limoeiro, at Praça Oito, approximately 19 o 55’S 40 o 50’W, Itarana, Espírito Santo, Brazil, 18 Oct 2000, R.L. Teixeira & P.S. Miller GoogleMaps .
Paratypes. BRAZIL. Espírito Santo. Rio Doce Drainage: MCP 30023, 90/5*, collected with the holotype. MCP 30021, 6, Itarana, córrego Jaboticas, 18 Oct 2000, R.L. Teixeira & P.S. Miller. MCP 30022, 1, Itarana, córrego Limoeiro, at Praça Oito, 8 Feb 2001, R.L. Teixeira & P.S. Miller. Rio Santa Maria da Vitória drainage: MNRJ 11645, 13, Santa Leopoldina, rio da Prata along road ES-080, 16 Feb 1988, P.A. Buckup et al. UMMZ 215314, 13, same data as for MNRJ 11645. Rio Jucu drainage: USNM 257031, 13, southern branch of rio Jucu between Isabel and Viana on road BR 262, 13 Nov 1982, N.A. Menezes et al . Rio Timbuí drainage: MCP 29435, 3, Santa Teresa, rio da Penha, Sítio do Rubinho, 24 Oct 2001, R.L. Teixeira. MNRJ 11640, 29, Santa Tereza, córrego at Valsugana Velha, 16 Feb 1988, P.A. Buckup et al. UMMZ 215307, 31/4*, same data as for MNRJ 11640.
Diagnosis. Phalloceros elachistos can be distinguished from P. anisophallos , P. megapolos , P. spiloura , P. reisi , P. buckupi , P. alessandrae , P. lucenorum , P. uai , P. pellos , and P. malabarbai by the female urogenital papilla straight along midline and located between the anus and the base of first anal-fin ray (vs. curved to the right, located laterally; border of the anal aperture in contact with the first anal-fin ray). Phalloceros elachistos can be distinguished from P. tupinamba , P. leptokeras , and P. aspilos by (1) the female urogenital papilla straight along midline (vs. slightly left turned); (2) absence of a lateral ramus of the female urogenital papilla (vs. lateral ramus present); and (3) small and simple hook in gonopodial appendix (vs. large sickle like hook) ( Fig. 22 View Fig ). Phalloceros elachistos can be distinguished from P. caudimaculatus , P. heptaktinos , P. ocellatus , P. mikrommatos , and P. leticiae by the possession of a hook in the gonopodial appendix (vs. hook absent). Phalloceros elachistos is readily distinguished from P. titthos by the absence of symphyseal papillae on mandible of large females (vs. symphyseal papillae present); and from P. enneaktinos by the possession of seven or eight dorsal-fin rays (vs. nine) (see remarks). Phalloceros elachistos can be distinguished from P. harpagos by the hook of gonopodial appendix, which is very small in adults, forming a minute lateral protuberance ( Fig. 22 View Fig ) (vs. not forming a lateral protuberance – see remarks on P. harpagos description). In juveniles hook (usually) is absent or (rarely) minuscule. When present in juveniles hook never situated on the appendix corner (vs. present and located on the appendix corner). Juveniles never present skin covering the tip of appendix (vs. skin present). Distal half of appendix approximately as wide as (or slightly narrower than) proximal half (vs. narrower than proximal half).
Description. Morphometric data in Tables 9 View Table 9 and 10 View Table 10 . Range of SL: 15.1 to 27.8 mm (females), 14.9 to 18.5 mm (males). Dorsal-fin rays: 7 [1], 8* [47], 9 [1]. Branched pectoral-fin rays: 6 [8], 7* [15]. Pelvic-fin rays: 5* [13] (males), 5 [31] (females).Anal-fin rays of females: 10 [1], 11 [29].Anal-fin rays of males: 8 [2], 9* [15]. Branched caudal-fin rays: 10 [1], 11 [21], 12* [22], 13 [1]. Predorsal scales: 13 [2], 14 [20], 15* [1]. Longitudinal series of scales: 28* [9], 29 [39], 30 [3]. Series of scales around caudal peduncle: 16* [55]. Transverse series of scales: 6 [1], 7* [54]. Serrae on R4p: 9 [3], 10 [6], 11* [6], 12 [1]. Epipleural ribs: 14 [3], 15 [2]. Pleural ribs: 14 [4], 15 [1]. Vertebrae: 31 [1], 32 [3], 33 [1]. Female urogenital papilla straight, located along midventral line and between anus and base of first anal-fin ray. Gonopodial appendix hook small sized. Appendix hook very small in adults, forming lateral minute protuberance ( Fig. 22 View Fig ). Hook (usually) absent or minute (rarely) in juveniles. When present in juveniles hook never situated on appendix corner. Juveniles never possess skin-covering tip of appendix. Distal half of appendix approximately as wide as (or slightly narrower than) proximal half ( Fig. 22 View Fig ).
Color in alcohol. Eye black with greenish brown pupil. Ground color pale brown, darker in upper half. Border of scales and subjacent skin replete with brown chromatophores, more concentrated at short distance from scale border, forming v-band conferring reticulate pattern to body sides, mainly on upper half. Brown chromatophores scattered through whole body, more concentrated on dorsal portion, mainly on head, snout, opercle, and ventral surface of mandible. Lateral dark brown spot very small, inconspicuous or absent. When present located approximately on 18th scale of longitudinal series covering approximately one scale on both horizontal and vertical directions. Inconspicuous vertical bars along flanks. Dorsal-fin membrane hyaline bearing dark band of chromatophores on distal border of dorsal fin and another near dorsal-fin base. Pectoral-, pelvic- and caudal-fin rays dusky. Dark brown line along R3.
Etymology. Specific name from the Greek ελαχυς, −εια [= elachis, -eia], adj. m. nom. sg.], small, short, little, plus the superlative ending −ιστος [= -istos]. Ελαχιστος, −η, −ον, [ = elachistos , -e, -on], meaning the least, which alludes to the small size of the specimens. An adjective, gender masculine.
Distribution. Drainages of rio Doce, Santa Maria da Vitória, Jucu, and Timbuí, coastal drainages of Espírito Santo State of Brazil ( Fig. 18 View Fig ).
Remarks. One out of 48 studied specimens presented nine dorsal-fin rays.
Phalloceros reisi | Phalloceros elachistos | Phalloceros enneaktinos | Phalloceros harpagos | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character | n = 71 | n = 36 | n = 8 | n = 407 | ||||
Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | |
Standard length (mm) | 23.2-49.9 | 33.6 | 15.1-27.8 | 20.8 | 23.5-35.8 | 29.6 | 18.4-46.8 | 29.2 |
1-Head length | 18.4-25.4 | 21.3 | 19.9-24.1 | 22.3 | 20.1-23.8 | 21.7 | 16.5-25.8 | 20.9 |
2-Snout-occipital distance | 15.0-22.5 | 18.6 | 20.9-24.9 | 22.8 | 22.6-25.6 | 24.3 | 17.5-26.5 | 21.9 |
3-Predorsal distance | 60.3-64.6 | 62.3 | 59.7-63.8 | 62.2 | 59.4-63.2 | 61.2 | 57.3-66.9 | 62.0 |
4-Dorsal-fin base length | 7.6-13.8 | 10.5 | 8.0-11.7 | 10.1 | 9.1-12.4 | 11.1 | 6.9-13.6 | 10.8 |
5-Anal-fin base length | 6.6-13.2 | 9.5 | 7.5-12.4 | 9.7 | 8.5-10.3 | 9.2 | 7.1-12.1 | 9.7 |
6-Body depth | 22.3-28.2 | 25.1 | 19.2-28.8 | 23.8 | 25.6-29.0 | 27.3 | 21.1-30.7 | 25.5 |
7-Pre-pelvic length | 41.0-45.9 | 43.6 | 40.5-44.9 | 42.9 | 42.2-45.3 | 43.7 | 39.7-47.9 | 43.3 |
8-Preanal length | 56.2-60.0 | 57.9 | 53.8-59.9 | 57.1 | 54.5-59.2 | 57.0 | 52..0-62.4 | 58.0 |
9-Postanal length | 33.9-39.2 | 36.2 | 32.6-39.2 | 36.3 | 35.4-39.2 | 37.6 | 31.5-43.3 | 35.9 |
10-Caudal peduncle depth | 13.2-16.2 | 14.7 | 13.6-16.9 | 15.1 | 15.3-16.5 | 16.1 | 12.5-17.2 | 14.9 |
11-Snout length | 19.3-31.4 | 25.6 | 17.8-27.0 | 22.1 | 18.3-28.2 | 22.3 | 15.3-33.3 | 21.5 |
12-Orbital diameter | 28.6-42.7 | 35.9 | 37.6-48.0 | 42.5 | 35.1-43.4 | 38.5 | 30.2-48.6 | 39.6 |
13-Postorbital length | 35.3-47.8 | 41.3 | 35.1-45.9 | 42.0 | 32.9-45.5 | 42.4 | 35.0-55.2 | 46.2 |
MCP |
MCP |
MNRJ |
Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Cristovao, Universidade do Rio Janeiro, Museu Nacional |
UMMZ |
USA, Michigan, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology |
USNM |
USA, Washington D.C., National Museum of Natural History, [formerly, United States National Museum] |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |