Clairvillia dispar Rondani, 1856
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4982020 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FEE5-FE82-5889-F92FFB7E60F0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Clairvillia dispar Rondani, 1856 |
status |
|
Clairvillia dispar Rondani, 1856 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1856: 75.
TYPE LOCALITY: Robineau-Desvoidy (1824: 254) gave no type locality in his original description of Phanemya musca Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 but presumably it is France because the work deals with French species .
TYPE MATERIAL: see Remarks.
CURRENT STATUS: junior synonym of Clairvillia biguttata ( Meigen, 1824) ( Herting & Dely-Draskovits 1993: 421) .
REMARKS: Rondani (1856: 75) considered the new nominal species Clairvillia dispar , rather than Clairvillia pusilla Meigen, 1824 sensu Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 , as the type species of the genus Clairvillia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 . He later ( Rondani 1861e: 86) considered the males of Phanemya musca Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 and the females of Clairvillia pusilla Meigen sensu Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 as belonging to the same species but, instead of applying the Principle of Priority, incorrectly proposed the species name Clairvillia dispar . It has always been considered as a synonym of Clairvillia biguttata ( Meigen, 1824) ( Bezzi & Stein 1907: 331, Herting 1969: 194), never as a valid species. The type material for Clairvillia dispar will be the same as for the name it was proposed to replace, i. e., Phanemya musca . There is no type of this latter species in the MNHN where the Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection is preserved (Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle 2020). Under the name Clairvillia dispar there are one male and one female (all are non-types) in the MSNC.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |