Macrocheles lundae Krantz
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.170355 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E06506A-35AC-482A-B8D6-B9FD02FB4A5C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6265952 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D765421-BC49-853D-857F-B63416EF7F5E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Macrocheles lundae Krantz |
status |
|
Macrocheles lundae Krantz, 1970: 19 .
Specimens examined: Site 9432, 1 female.
Macrocheles lundae Krantz was described from a collection from Kleinmond, South Africa ( Krantz, 1970), very close to the present collection from Stellenbosch. The types were collected on a scarabaeid beetle, so it may be that this species is normally associated with dung or some other transient habitat in which such beetles occur. A search of almost 500 specimens of Macrocheles associated with South African dung beetles failed to reveal any further specimens of this species (specimens in ANIC). It is obviously not an abundant species in crops and pastures, and is not likely to have any impact on populations of H. destructor .
Macrocheles propinquus sp. nov. ( Figs 21 View FIGURES 21 – 25 View FIGURES 26 – 28 –28)
Specimens examined
Holotype female, Plettenberg Bay, roadside picnic area, 18.viii.1994, T. K. Qin, clover, grass, capeweed, site 3013 (= 9413). Paratypes, 3 females, 2 males, same data as holotype.
Description
Female
Dorsal idiosoma ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Dorsal shield 794–823 µm long, 483–512 µm wide (n=4), with polygonal ornamentation throughout, weakest centrally, strongly developed posterior to setae Z4; with 28 pairs of setae and 22 pairs of pores; j1 adjacent, heavily pilose distally; j4, z4, J5, Z5, S5 lightly pilose distally; others smooth and pointed.
Ventral idiosoma ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Tritosternum with rectangular base and strongly pilose laciniae. Sternal shield strongly ornamented; with a wavy line of punctations joining setae st2, punctate lines in anterior half of shield, and a band of heavy punctation in posterior half; shield with three pairs of smooth pointed setae and two pairs of lyriform pores. Epigynial shield semicircular, with curved lines of punctations and a pair of smooth pointed setae; flanked by and partly covering a pair of elongate paragynial plates; metasternal plates small, oval, each with a smooth pointed posterior seta and an anterior pore. Ventrianal shield with concentric curved lines of punctations in anterior half, punctate polygonal ornamentation in posterior half, with three pairs of smooth pointed ventrianal setae, a pair of smooth paraanal setae, and a short, smooth postanal seta; cribrum very narrow, not reaching postanal seta. Unsclerotised opisthogastric integument with a pair of narrow elongate metapodal plates and ca. 7 pairs of setae, each inserted in a minute platelet.
Gnathosoma . Epistome with a long bifurcate median process, spiculate basally, triangular lateral processes, and serrated lateral margins ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Fixed digit of chelicera with a heavy ridged triangular tooth and a terminal hook; dorsal seta heavy, erect, pilus dentilis long, fine. Movable digit with a bidentate proximal tooth, a small triangular distal tooth, and a terminal hook; arthrodial brush long, more than half length of movable digit ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Hypostomal groove with 5 rows of denticles, each with ca. 15 denticles, a smooth transverse groove, and an Mshaped anterior row of denticles. Anterior hypostomal setae (h1) and internal posterior hypostomal setae (h3) long (ca. 65 µm), exterior posterior hypostomal (h2) and palp coxal setae shorter (ca. 30 µm); internal malae fine, curled ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21 – 25 ). Palp chaetotaxy normal for genus, palp tarsal claw 3tined.
Legs. Chaetotaxy: Leg I: coxa 0 0/1 0/1 0; trochanter 1 0/1 0/2 1; femur 2 3/1 2/3 2; genu 2 3/1 2/1 2; tibia 2 3/2 2/1 2; Leg II: coxa 0 0/1 0/1 0; trochanter 1 0/1 0/2 1; femur 2 3/1 2/2 1; genu 2 3/1 2/1 2; tibia 2 2/1 2/1 2; tarsus 3 3/2 3/2 3 + mv, md; Leg III: coxa 0 0/ 1 0/1 0; trochanter 1 1/1 0/1 1; femur 1 2/1 1/0 1; genu 1 2/1 2/0 1; tibia 1 1/1 2/1 1; tarsus 3 3/2 3/2 3 + mv, md; Leg IV: coxa 0 0/1 0/0 0; trochanter 1 1/2 0/1 0; femur 1 2/1 1/0 1; genu 1 2/1 2/0 0; tibia 1 1/1 2/1 1; tarsus 3 3/2 3/2 3 + mv, md. All setae fine, smooth, pointed, except for 5–6 setae on each of tarsi II–IV, which are thickened and spinelike, and ventral setae on tibia and basifemur IV, which have slight distal pilosity. Pretarsi II– IV with opercula shorter than claws, with short distal bifurcation, lateral lobes of pulvillus similar in length to median lobe.
Male
Dorsal idiosoma. Dorsal shield 554–559 µm long, 349–353 µm wide (n=2); narrowed posteriorly, posterior margin dentate; chaetotaxy as for female except J2 displaced posteriorly between pores P12 and P14.
Ventral idiosoma. Sternal and genital shields fused to form a sternitigenital shield with five pairs of smooth pointed setae and four pairs of pores, shield expanded laterally to capture an additional two pairs of opisthogastric setae, shield with uniform punctate ornamentation throughout; ventrianal shield with 3 pairs of ventrianal setae, pair of paraanal setae and postanal seta, all smooth and pointed, shield with uniform punctate ornamentation throughout.
Gnathosoma . Fixed digit of chelicera with three small triangular distal teeth, a robust medial tooth and a terminal hook, dorsal seta conspicuous; movable digit with one medial tooth and a terminal hook; spermatodactyl sinuous, tapering to a fine distal point ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ). Other features of gnathosoma as for female.
Legs. As for female, except ventral surface of femur II with a heavy thumblike spur, seta av on genu and tibia II represented by short blunt protrusions ( Fig 27 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ); femur IV with a large posterolateral thumblike spur and a ventral spur bearing a thickened spinelike seta ( Fig 28 View FIGURES 26 – 28 ).
Notes
At least 30 described species of Macrocheles have been recognised in southern Africa ( Ryke & Meyer, 1958; Ryke, 1959, 1964; Evans & Hyatt, 1963; Krantz, 1970, 1981; Van Driel, 1973, excluding the species described by Van Driel, 1973, whose names are not available). M. propinquus may be distinguished from all of these by the distinctive pattern of sternal shield ornamentation in the female.
M. propinquus is a member of the Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Scopoli) species group, which prey on insect eggs and larvae wherever there is decaying organic matter, especially dung ( Halliday, 1990). The characteristic features of this group are the pattern of ornamentation on the sternal shield of the female; specifically, a transverse punctate line joining the bases of the second pair of sternal setae, a pair of punctate lines passing through the first sternal pores and running obliquely back towards the centre of the shield, and a band of strongly developed irregular ornamentation across the full width of the posterior half of the shield. The female of M. propinquus is strikingly similar to that of M. muscaedomesticae . The females of these two species may be distinguished by dorsal shield setae r2, r3, r5, which are smooth and pointed in M. propinquus , distally pilose in M. muscaedomesticae . Also the sternitigenital shield and ventrianal shields of the male are fused in M. muscaedomesticae , separate in M. propinquus .
The fact that this species was represented by only 6 specimens from a single locality, and that at a picnic area, suggests a biology similar to that of Macrocheles muscaedomesticae , which often occurs in humanproduced rubbish deposits. The single locality at which it has been collected is outside the geographic distribution of H. destructor . This species has not been recorded in Australia, but is unlikely to be a useful predator of H. destructor .
Etymology
The name of this species alludes to its close similarity to M. muscaedomesticae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Macrocheles lundae Krantz
Halliday, R. B. 2005 |
Macrocheles lundae
Krantz 1970: 19 |