Kirinua S. Li & Lin, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1072.67935 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F578799-E05F-4411-8E2D-378E3C17F3E3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5FD94CCF-CB91-485B-A2BF-6FABEDF07B53 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:5FD94CCF-CB91-485B-A2BF-6FABEDF07B53 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Kirinua S. Li & Lin |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Kirinua S. Li & Lin gen. nov.
Type species.
Kirinua maguai sp. nov., from Guangxi, China.
Etymology.
The generic name is derived from Kirin, one of the most powerful creatures ever known in East Asia. The gender is masculine.
Diagnosis.
Kirinua gen. nov. can be distinguished from Globignatha and Symphytognatha by the chelicerae, which are fused only near the base (Figs 15I View Figure 15 and 17I View Figure 17 ) vs. entirely fused (Balogh and Loksa 1968: fig. 10; Lin 2019: fig. 1H) and from Anapistula by having 6 eyes vs. 4 (except A. boneti Forster, 1958 with 6 eyes). It can be distinguished from Anapogonia , Curimagua and Iardinis by 6 eyes in three diads vs. 6 eyes in two triads and from Crassignatha and Swilda gen. nov. by lacking an abdominal scutum in males and a mostly smooth carapace in both sexes (Figs 15A-H View Figure 15 and 17A-H View Figure 17 ) vs. abdominal scutum usually present in the male and carapace generally covered with tubercles or tiny thorn-like protrusions (Figs 19A, D View Figure 19 , 21A View Figure 21 and D View Figure 21 ; Li et al. 2020: fig. 1A-F; Rivera-Quiroz et al. 2021: figs 10b and 11b). Kirinua gen. nov. is similar to Patu in having 1-2 disto-ventral clasping spines on male tibia II, lacking an abdominal scutum latero-posteriorly in the male and the generally smooth carapace in both sexes (Figs 15A-H View Figure 15 and 17A-H View Figure 17 ), but it can be distinguished by the male palp having cymbial structures (e.g. primary apophysis, process) and the female having nearly spherical spermathecae (Figs 16A, G View Figure 16 , 18A View Figure 18 and F View Figure 18 ) vs. male palp lacking cymbial structures and female with rod-shaped or oval spermathecae (Figs 3A, B, F View Figure 3 , 9A View Figure 9 , B View Figure 9 and F View Figure 9 ).
Description.
Tiny, total length 0.60-0.80. Carapace rounded or pear-shaped dorsally, nearly triangular laterally (Figs 15A View Figure 15 , 15D View Figure 15 , 17A View Figure 17 and 17D View Figure 17 ). Six eyes in 3 diads, cephalic part raised (Figs 15A View Figure 15 , 15D View Figure 15 , 17A View Figure 17 and 17D View Figure 17 ). Clypeus concave, with pair of inverted, weakly sclerotised grooves in male (Figs 15G, H View Figure 15 , 17G View Figure 17 and H View Figure 17 ). Female lacking palps. Chelicerae fused at middle, with 2 adnate teeth (Figs 15I View Figure 15 and 17I View Figure 17 ). Labium wider than long, fused to sternum, anterior margin with shallow notch in the middle (Figs 15B, E View Figure 15 , 17B View Figure 17 and E View Figure 17 ). Sternum heart-shaped, slightly plump, truncated posteriorly. Male tibia II with 2 subdistal ventral clasping spines (Figs 15C View Figure 15 and 17C View Figure 17 ). Abdomen round in dorsal view, subovoid in lateral view, without posterior lobes or tubercles (Figs 15C, F View Figure 15 , 17C and F View Figure 17 ). Anterior spinnerets larger than posteriors, median spinnerets hardly visible. Colulus absent.
Male palp (Figs 16A-C View Figure 16 , 18A View Figure 18 and B View Figure 18 ): relatively large, ~ ½ size of carapace. Cymbium distinctly sclerotised, with 2 processes and a primary cymbial apophysis. Median apophysis present, finger-like, nearly as long as cymbial apophysis. Tegulum with a triangular apical process. Embolus short, stout, strongly sclerotised, tip furcate or blunt.
Epigyne (Figs 16D-G View Figure 16 and 18C-F View Figure 18 ): distinctly sclerotised. Scape present, inconspicuous, inflexible. Spermathecae globose, separated by at least 2 diameters. Copulatory ducts long, proximally fused, expanded into a broad atrium, distally curved or coiled between spermathecae. Fertilisation ducts short, thin. Inlet of copulatory duct and outlet of fertilisation duct nearly located at same position on spermatheca.
Composition.
Kirinua maguai sp. nov. and K. yangshuo sp. nov.
Distribution.
China (Guangxi) (Fig. 23 View Figure 23 ).
Relationships.
Kirinua gen. nov. is characterised by their tiny size, chelicerae fused at mid-line, AMEs and book lungs absent, female lacking palps and tarsi much longer than metatarsi. This new genus is similar to Patu by having 2 clasping spines on male tibia II, lacking an abdominal scutum latero-posteriorly in the male and the carapace of both sexes lacks modified pits or sculpturing (Figs 15A-H View Figure 15 and 17A-H View Figure 17 ). The new genus differs from Patu by the highly modified structures of the cymbium (e.g. primary apophysis, process) and the epigyne has nearly spherical spermathecae and a broad atrium (Figs 16A, G View Figure 16 , 18A View Figure 18 and F View Figure 18 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.